MovieChat Forums > fc31 > Replies
fc31's Replies
This movie is about tragedies in every sense. You are just not thinking.
There is a Julie Robert movie called "Mona Lisa Smile", where Julie Roberts played a arts teacher. She showed a painting not on text book to her students, who all read their text book cover to cover knows everything about art, and asked them:"Is this art?" and none can answer. Because those students do not know what art is without someone telling them.
This is not really a comedy, at least not to me, not even a dark comedy. Not really a satire or fiction either but it has those elements as well.
Do you really need other people to tell you what you should think about a movie?
I don't feel the same way but I understand it. Wall street takes in all kinds of desperate souls.
They rationalize it, they are taking from the rich, ignoring the fact they are destroying lives and families. The same way debt collectors and people working for medical insurance companies denying claims, they just get more money from it. To be honest they are at least better than the people I just mentioned, at least they are not praying on the poor and vulnerable.
I think it has to be a nude scene for it to make an impact. I don't think any other way could make the same point. Nudity might offend some people, but it reflected what fueled the excess of the wall street, the sex and drug culture.
It is not supposed to make you laugh. This movie is about wall street culture. It is about a guy with average moral values corrupted by wall street then he went on corrupting others. That is the vicious circle of wall street. People refused to be corrupted by money and greed are unfit to work there.
This is what is happening everyday, it is hard to watch but it is the truth of this world. You might not want to know it but if one less person becomes the victim of wall street due to this movie then this movie has a reason to exist.
I don't see it, care to provide a link.
Kong is more of a humanoid, there could be more relatable story about him. Godzilla is much less so.
Taking monsters out of monster movies? That is a great idea. Please keep taking whatever medication you were on before.
It is possible Kong is still very young for it's race.
2014 film did not create a fully established monster verse.
Also arrogance and ignorance are not good when mixed together.
I guess those are the countries have the pandemic under control and lives going back to normal a bit earlier.
Already exceeded Tenet domestic total, which is $58 million.
$297 million worldwide only after a week, passing Tenet is going to be pretty easy as well.
Similar body type, face not as much.
"Godzilla: King of the Monsters", that is the movie I think established the monster verse. You should watch it if you want to make sense of this one.
It is also the first Godzillia movie Millie Bobby Brown stared in. I've got a feeling she will be in the next one too.
Close, but it feels like they are different type of things.
Thanks, and you are right, that is really a go to color scheme for this type of movies.
I think the main lead of the movie is Kong.
Well, Both did, multiple times. But I agree, it is a click bait.
Which ones? It looks familiar but I could not remember the posters of the same color scheme.
I think that is the idea.