MovieChat Forums > eYeDEF > Replies
eYeDEF's Replies
Yeah what a weird roided up goon he was. LoL, How could I forget?
Remember his tricked out trump-mobile? Actually I think it was more like a VW van plastered with trump stickers that he lived out of.
lulz ... once again Lame Diversion. You are the one making false claims about Hunter Biden that you pulled from John Solomon's fever swamps when this thread is about impeachment hearings of your fuhrer, not Hunter Biden. But I understand the gaslighting technique your fuhrer taught you so well is to always accuse others of what you're guilty of yourself in spades. Except it doesn't really work except to highlight your own guilt and utter stupidity. You are such an indefatigable face plant machine it's just so hilarious. 🤪🤪🤪
Good Times.
And of course you didn't answer my question because you know if you did it will just further expose your transparent hypocrisy. Why don't you support investigations of your fuhrer's numerous conflicts of interest like what your fuhrer demands of Biden?
Lame diversion. This thread is about impeachment hearings, not Warren supporters.
And of course you didn't answer my question. Why aren't you supporting investigations into Trump's numerous conflicts of interest, which are legion and well documented, like Trump is demanding of Biden? You right wing Solomon conspiracy loons lie to yourself so much that I'm sure you just typed your post completely oblivious to your transparent hypocrisy.
I personally don't care about Biden or his loserish, black sheep son. He took that position knowing the headaches it could cause for his father and was strongly advised by his law partner against it. But I do sympathise with why Joe lost his temper when a voter leveled the false charge that he had arranged for his son to get that job on the board of Burisma, a bogus accusation dredged straight from the Solomon conspiracy swamps. But since you take Solomon's word as your Bible I don't expect you'll understand.
The facts showing the Trumps' obvious conflicts of interest are neither Democrat or Republican:
https://sunlightfoundation.com/tracking-trumps-conflicts-of-interest/
Why aren't you calling for them to be investigated?
You mean because Nadler won't agree to play the GOP's lame game of trying to call Hunter Biden to testify? That's just Nadler trying to keep order from such an obvious GOP stunt catered to their own right wing conspiracy swamps. Only the Trump TV crowd will view it negatively.
Dear Lord, teach Donald Trump your values and help him understand the Golden Rule, what it means, and that it's not a sex thing.
ROTFLMFAO!!!
It was hysterical. I loved Kate McKinnon's Merkel. She's an amazing talent.
LulZ...you sound like a typical victim of right wing propaganda for believing the Obamas were ever socialist. Too much faux news will do that to you.
FYI: During his first term Obama made 96% of Bush's expiring tax cuts for the rich permanent. Look it up. That's not something a socialist would do.
It's weird you'd think they'd want to confine themselves to Chicago.
Sounds like it just eats you up inside.
LolZ! With one search you might have learned that Michelle Obama pocketed a 65 mil advance on her book deal two years ago. She subsequently went on a book tour and was feted like a rock star by sold out crowds, so it was well worth it for the publisher.
Rofl. I doubt an obese whale like Bubba would qualify. They'd probably want someone who doesn't stick to the bottom of the pool.
Hilarious his he's blaming his orange color today on environmentalists and not makeup.
It's true. In court to prove someone lied you have to prove intent. You have not done that.
No there's a difference between misspeaking when citing facts and making things up like trump.
Why would I say that? I said I wasn't aware of him deliberately lying. I believe he's generally an honest guy until I see oterwise. Pointing to sentences he said that were false because he left a couple words like "on average" does not prove he lied.
To prove he actually lied instead of misspoke you have to prove intent. You haven't done that.
You understand there's a difference between misspeaking and deliberately lying right?
Whoa dude. I found all sorts of false allegations of Sanders on that page. Policy wise there is no discernible difference between Sanders "Democratic Socialism" and FDR's New Deal Liberalism. Yet that page tries to say there is and Sanders is lying without providing proof. It's also ridiculously unfair by claiming Sanders lied about not campaigning for Hillary when that's not true either. Clearly was written by a Hillary supporter with an axe to grind.
I read that as a CNN hit piece because it was clear Sanders misspoke because he didn't include "on average" which would have made the statement true.
https://www.factcheck.org/2015/08/sanders-hypes-health-spending/
But the fact he makes the accurate statement on his website makes it obvious that he misspoke and did not deliberately lie.
Actually I'm not aware of when Bernie has ever lied. Provide proof that he lied I'll admit I was wrong. If you can't doesn't that make YOU the liar here?