https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0dsyiRZzwA
Lots of point of order, gentlemen not recognized, badgering witness fight mania. Kinda looks bad for Nadler since outside viewers will look at this and see Nadler silencing a lot of folks on the other side.
You mean because Nadler won't agree to play the GOP's lame game of trying to call Hunter Biden to testify? That's just Nadler trying to keep order from such an obvious GOP stunt catered to their own right wing conspiracy swamps. Only the Trump TV crowd will view it negatively.
shareThe 83 year old man who asked the Hunter Biden question at the town hall, prompting Biden to have a meltdown in which he called the older man "fat" and a "damn liar" while challenging him to a push up contest, is a Warren supporter, not a Trump supporter. The facts showing the Bidens' obvious conflict of interest are neither Democrat or Republican.
shareThe facts showing the Trumps' obvious conflicts of interest are neither Democrat or Republican:
https://sunlightfoundation.com/tracking-trumps-conflicts-of-interest/
Why aren't you calling for them to be investigated?
Agreed
Blatant & in plain sight
Lame diversion. You can't dismiss Warren supporters as "right wing conspiracy swamps" or accurately claim that "only the Trump tv crowd will view it negatively".
That leftist propaganda outfit's anti-Trump spiel you linked to is beside the point. While the situations are apples and oranges, I'm not calling for anyone to be impeached or prosecuted for inquiring about potential Trump conflicts of interest either, and Trump and his associates have been investigated to an extreme degree since he was a candidate. Whether you feel they or the Biden dealings would eventually prove to be completely legitimate isn't the issue. Questioning them isn't illegal.
Lame diversion. This thread is about impeachment hearings, not Warren supporters.
And of course you didn't answer my question. Why aren't you supporting investigations into Trump's numerous conflicts of interest, which are legion and well documented, like Trump is demanding of Biden? You right wing Solomon conspiracy loons lie to yourself so much that I'm sure you just typed your post completely oblivious to your transparent hypocrisy.
I personally don't care about Biden or his loserish, black sheep son. He took that position knowing the headaches it could cause for his father and was strongly advised by his law partner against it. But I do sympathise with why Joe lost his temper when a voter leveled the false charge that he had arranged for his son to get that job on the board of Burisma, a bogus accusation dredged straight from the Solomon conspiracy swamps. But since you take Solomon's word as your Bible I don't expect you'll understand.
This thread is about impeachment hearings, not Warren supporters.
lulz ... once again Lame Diversion. You are the one making false claims about Hunter Biden that you pulled from John Solomon's fever swamps when this thread is about impeachment hearings of your fuhrer, not Hunter Biden. But I understand the gaslighting technique your fuhrer taught you so well is to always accuse others of what you're guilty of yourself in spades. Except it doesn't really work except to highlight your own guilt and utter stupidity. You are such an indefatigable face plant machine it's just so hilarious. 🤪🤪🤪
Good Times.
And of course you didn't answer my question because you know if you did it will just further expose your transparent hypocrisy. Why don't you support investigations of your fuhrer's numerous conflicts of interest like what your fuhrer demands of Biden?
😄 I didn't even make any claims about Hunter Biden here, you buffoon. I just pointed out that the conflict of interest topic raised by the 83 year old Warren supporter whose question caused Biden's melt down has been widely covered by leftist outlets. In fact he mentioned being influenced by a segment on MSNBC. Your pitiful attempt to spin this into an anti-Trump thing where any Biden scandal is just something from "right wing conspiracy swamps" that " "only the Trump tv crowd" will view negatively is objectively incorrect.
But then your posting is habitually incorrect, isn't it? You're a drooling moron with no scruples, a combination that leads you into constant faceplants. You even project about projecting, and, as typical when you panic, start dropping insane "fuhrer" pellets like a nervous rabbit (at least 4 in that one post! 😄😄) while ranting about "John Solomon".
That's why you're my favorite punching bag, eyedef. Good times indeed. 😎
LMAO ... oh look, it's the delusional christo-fascist John Solomon clown denying reality again saying he never brought up Hunter Biden when this whole time you've been trying to push the bogus validity of an 83 year old Solomon goon falsely accusing Biden of getting his son a job at Burisma. Did your low IQ gaslighting self really think that fib was going to work? Hunter Biden is all you talk about in this thread you garrulous babbling baboon. 😂
krstupid1 is the moniker I now bequeath you since you are literally too dumb to keep track of what lie you push from one post to the next. You're welcome and Good Times.👍
So krstupid1, why don't you support investigations of your fuhrer's numerous conflicts of interest like what your fuhrer demands of Biden? Why are you so afraid of answering the question? Too stupid for truth? 😱
saying he never brought up Hunter Biden
it's the delusional christo-fascist John Solomon clown denying reality
the bogus validity of an 83 year old Solomon goon
why don't you support investigations of your fuhrer's numerous conflicts of interest like what your fuhrer demands of Biden?
krstupid1 is the moniker I now bequeath
LMAO ... oh look, it's the delusional christo-fascist John Solomon clown denying reality again saying he never brought up Hunter Biden when this whole time you've been trying to push the bogus validity of an 83 year old Solomon goon falsely accusing Biden of getting his son a job at Burisma. Did your low IQ gaslighting self really think that fib was going to work? Hunter Biden is all you talk about in this thread you garrulous babbling baboon. 😂
krstupid1 is the moniker I now bequeath you since you are literally too dumb to keep track of what lie you push from one post to the next. You're welcome and Good Times.👍
So krstupid1, why don't you support investigations of your fuhrer's numerous conflicts of interest like what your fuhrer demands of Biden? Why are you so afraid of answering the question? Too stupid for truth? 😱
Trumpers gotta defend Trump at all costs. That's the job.
shareLOL! What does Biden attacking a Warren supporter have to do with Trump, you cowardly halfwit? Why don't you summon up some integrity and answer this question?
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/5dee9c0c3231dd71bffcf26a/How-many-Democrats-here-would-support-impeaching-Obama-if-this-same-case-had-been-brought-against-him
Lol wut? I replied to eYeDEF's post about Trumps' conflicts of interest.
And please tell me what the fuck Biden attacking a Warren supporter has to do with a thread about the House Impeachment inquiry, you troglodyte homunculus.
Look fat, here's the deal. You dems have to defend dems regardless. Ignorance is Strength. In regards to Nadler, how many points of order are made, yet Nadler can't give a proper law to back up his chepooka. Once again, as a phony you are, you look the other way.
As all of you bitched about and said if Trump has nothing to hide, then why doesn't he just testify. Well then, why doesn't Hunter Biden just testify? He did nothing wrong, per you and your komrade dunces. Well then?
Hypocrite much? Idiot much? Dunce much? Ignorant much? Contradict much? Phony much?🤪🤪🤪
There's nothing for Hunter Biden to testify for. There are no illicit accusations against him, and therefore no investigation into him.
Unless you're saying he should testify in front of the Infowars committee 🤪🤪🤪
Look fat, here's the deal. He did nothing wrong, right? Nothing to hide right? So if the republicans supoena him, the dems shouldn't block him because he's got nothing to hide right? You understand that logic, right, phony man?🤪🤪🤪
shareSimpleton Sandy, stop deflecting! Why are you supporting a corrupt politician who held up bipartisan-approved military aid from the Ukraine's ongoing war against the invading Russians in exchange for foreign intervention in the American elections?
Look fat, here's the deal. You're the one that is deflecting. I asked the phony man a question and you jumped in.🤪🤪🤪
The phony man, UV is a big boy. He can speak for himself. However, since you want to take up the mantle for him, answer the question for him. You agree with your komrade, yes? You don't think Hunter did anything wrong, yes? You said Trump should just testify, yes? So then since Hunter has nothing to hide and if he gets subpoenaed, the dems should allow it, yes?
Simpleton Sandy, I consider you anti-American for siding with our enemy the Russian government over true patriotic Americans working in the FBI and other intelligence agencies who debunked your conspiracy theory. Are you calling fellow Americans whose job is to protect us liars and siding instead with Putin who spits on our Constitution?
You're also anti-American for spreading Russian propaganda!
Why do you hate America so much? Such vile behavior from you!
Look fat, here's the deal. IG report shows the FBI spied on the Trump campaign over the thinnest of evidence. When they showed Russian involvement, did Obama's adminstration alert anybody? No. And I'm the one that's Anti-American? Puh-leeze. Ignorance is Strength, proven once again, komrade.
I'm calling you all idiotic partisans that continue to FAIL to uphold the constitution. 1st Amendment guarantees Freedom of Speech and Assembly, yet you side with Anti-Fa that constantly denies citizens these rights. Hypocrite much?
2nd Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms and yet you side with gun buybacks and government confiscation. Hypocrite much?
5th Amendment states "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." And yet you side with Fauxcahontas and her wealth tax. Hypocrite much?
State the Russian propaganda I've been spreading. Be as detailed as possible.
You're just as phony as the other idiot. Look at all the hypocrisy you show and yet you claim to be a constitutionalist. What a joke komrade. You're just a kommunist komrade keelai. Indoctrinated much?
You forgot to take your meds, Simpleton Sandy! You're basically having delusions in which you've imagined I wrote things which I haven't.
I don't forgive you for being anti-American and spewing Russian propaganda. Shame on you!
Notice how you FAILED to address anything in my post? You are such a constitutionalist! Idiot much? Dunce much? Hypocrite much? Ignorant much? Indoctrinated much?
The flashcards, komrade. Don't forget about the flashcards, dunce.🤪🤪🤪
"Look fat," this impeachment stuff is a bunch of malarkey! 😂
share520 legal scholars disagree with your opinion.
"There is overwhelming evidence that President Trump betrayed his oath of office by seeking to use presidential power to pressure a foreign government to help him distort an American election, for his personal and political benefit, at the direct expense of national security interests as determined by Congress. His conduct is precisely the type of threat to our democracy that the Founders feared when they included the remedy of impeachment in the Constitution."
https://medium.com/@legalscholarsonimpeachment/letter-to-congress-from-legal-scholars-6c18b5b6d116
look fat, who are those scholars?
please list below...
Click link. Scroll down.
shareThis embedded content is from a site that does not comply with the Do Not Track (DNT) setting now enabled on your browser.
Please note, if you click through and view it anyway, you may be tracked by the website hosting the embed.
Learn More about Medium's DNT policy
SHOW EMBED
looks shady to me...
Our side could find just as many "scholars" who would disagree.
It means nothing.
You sound just like what I listened to for 10+ hours today.
I agree with what the Republicans said and I'm sure you agree with the Democrats.
It's nothing but ring around the rosie.
Edit: I'm referring to the hearings on 12/12 but it applies to any and all of the recent hearings going on.
"Our side could find just as many "scholars" who would disagree."
Link?
Where's your link to the 520+ scholars who disagree about impeachment as per this comment?
"Our side could find just as many "scholars" who would disagree."
A bias opinion from an ideologue is irrelevant to me.
Link?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2019/08/20/jon-voight-trump-the-greatest-president-century/2059215001/
The Internet has spoken. Trump is the best and Obama is the worst.
Lol wut? I replied to eYeDEF's post about Trumps' conflicts of interest.
I replied to him. It was not an indirect reply to you. That is why those type of replies do not show up in your notifications.
I didn't bother to click your link because your entire reply to me was based on a false presumption that I was replying to you. I replied to eYeDEF.
To answer it, it would be damning if Obama was caught red-handed making a call to a foreign power asking for them to investigate a political opponent.
And then on top of it, if we were to learn that Obama was cooking up a scheme to remove the anti-corruption team in that foreign power to help the investigation of the political opponent, Obama would be facing treason charges right now as we speak.
Repubs investigated Hillary for four years because four people died in Benghazi that had nothing to do with her.
Then repubs spent another three years investigating her for sending emails to people who were allowed to see them.
There's no way Obama would be let off the hook for something like this.
Since his post was about me I was presumably the chief example of "Trumpers" you were libeling in your inane post. It doesn't matter whether you directly replied to me or not, LOL. I know you're a simpleton but it's mindboggling that you can't even grasp that.
Obama's administration abused its power to surveil Trump's campaign, used foreign agents to set up some peripheral members in half-baked sting operations, and through its connections facilitated and then exploited the creation of a Russian (actually it turns out largely Ukrainian) "dossier" filled with bogus dirt on Trump. That's all vastly worse than anything Democrats are even accusing Trump of, and you're just fine with that.
So you're clearing lying when you claim you'd support Obama's removal if he had simply made a "phone call" in which, among other things, he asked about a specific case involving Trump, Romney, McCain, etc..
And Obama never faced a special counsel or an independent investigation with any teeth, despite his own IG finding that his IRS had discriminated against conservative groups, Lois Lerner taking the Fifth, people dying in Fast and Furious, etc.. Hillary was the State Department head who had sent those diplomats to Libya and ignored their repeatedly desperate requests for enhanced security, and who knowingly lied about the attack itself in the cover up that followed. She even had the scapegoat imprisoned. So she had a lot to do with it.
She's also guilty of crimes in the email case based on publicly known facts, including destroying subpoenaed evidence, mishandling classified info, and lying to the FBI. Comey admitted most of this and yet let her off the hook for political reasons. He's since been campaigning for Democrats.
Obama was slobbered over by the media, weaponized the government to help create a two tiered justice system, and was protected the whole time by partisan stonewallers like Holder. He did get away with it, except that his arrogance and incompetence may lead to the destruction of his legacy by helping to elect Trump.
Wow! You've learned your lessons well, rookie. Lol!
share[deleted]
LMFAO!
shareDoggie is making popcorn ! 🍿