MovieChat Forums > FordFairlane > Replies
FordFairlane's Replies
So you're only comeback is more "whatsboutism"?
Does this have anything to do with Ed Klein selling a book about Hillary Clinton called, "Guilty as Sin"?
"The Justice Department has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was secretary of state, and is considering offering her a plea bargain if [b]she will agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law[/b], according to a Clinton attorney."
lolololololol
Do you have any sources that arnet extreme right?
+1
Mark kermode said life was a rip off of alien, yet there was more originality in that movie than there was in alien covenant. I hated both movies, but hes not wrong.
Just rewatched it, and its actually worse on the 2nd viewing. Even my dog looked at me half way through it and then walked out the room lol.
Pretty obvious facts if you believe everything you read in the funny papers. I always laugh at you calling me a troll. The guy who posts nothing but ring wing fake news propaganda. If you had a real point you wouldnt have to resort to making shit up. SJWs are annoying as fuck, and theres many an example of why. Dont need to make up shit about them. Of course you really need to push that "leftists are the devil that want to steal all our cheese" nonsense.
Grow the fuck up ya whiny little bitch. Trump has shown you hes not on your side. Time to put your big boy pants on and fucking deal with it.
😂 the daily wire, with more fake news stories than there are stars in the sky. They probably found one utter muppet and spun th story. That's their usual mo.
Wasnt gory? People fucking, eating each other, cutting pieces of themselves, etc.
New alien franchise? No thanks, the potential here is far beyond anything like that.
Bad cgi, sure, it was 1997.
Sam neill most definitely hammed up that role. He was terrible.
Anderson isnt overrated, everyone knows hes fucking terrible. Hes an american owe boll. Those resident evil movies are an affront not only to their source material but to that art of making movies.
I agree with remaking movies that had good ideas but failed in execution. Why keep remaking classics when theres a wealth of good ideas buried in shit movies? But then again, hollywood is in no rush to gamble on anything that isnt a guaranteed hit.
You wound me, sir. Thinking I have not already watched all of castle. Even that meh ending they came up with when they couldn't decide if they were cancelling the show or not.
Well I do appreciate that. I have to say watching the show again I feel the 80s to 90s stuff isn't as good. Haven't watched columbo in years but the 70s stuff holds up very well to how I remember how great the show was. Bu the 80/90s stuff just seems awash with that period down to the current over use of saxophone in sex and the married detective.
Soooooo close. I really mean it you missed it by like 4 episodes. Well, 10 years. But only 4 episodes lol
either way ill still be right. Remember my statement is that your thinking has no baring on the quality of the show. Which isn't dependent on a good or bad outcome.
But I tell you what, if you can think that the episode of columbo I'm watchign right now is good or bad, I'll believe you. 😏
Ah and there's the magic sentence. It's where the show is that has people's backs up. Sure, they may not like the look of the show, but that cbs access stuff has made people snakey from the start.
I mean I know it's not what you might want, but, and hear me out, I think being on the internet might be a good thing. It takes the shackles off the show. Think about the quality of shows from Netflix or Amazon. Being free of normal tv codes of practice has made for some top notch tv. Also consider that in the 90s when star Trek was at its peak its was in syndication not a specific channel. It didn't have to rely on the silly nature of today's tv. Enterprise suffered greatly from being on upn. So maybe being on an inter service might allow for Star Trek to succeed again.
I'm not saying it will be, it honestly looks like they've gone they new Trek route of pew pew and nothing else. I guess we will see. I think it would have been better for them to do what Netflix does and put all the episodes up at once. But that would negate the point of dragging it out to get access subscriptions. Well, in the us anyway. Everyone else it actually will be on Netflix. Lol.
You may think that. But I'll still be right. Even if it's the worst thing since Star Trek 5, it still won't be because you thought it ;)
magic.
Based on trailers, not the finished product. Perhaps I was unclear, Im not saying it wont be bad. Or that it will be good. Im saying that 'thinking" it will be bad wont have any effect of whether not it is bad. Everyone thought ben affleck would suck as batman. Turns out not so much.
If it is bad, it wont be because you think it will be.