MovieChat Forums > MAGolding > Replies
MAGolding's Replies
I had chemotherapy for six months after a cancer operation. I had port put in my chest with a tube going to my heart. Every two weeks I would go and get a poison pump with a load of poison hooked up to the port. The pump would pump the poison through the port into my heart which would pump it all over my body to kill any remaining cancer cells. I would wear the poison pump for two days every two weeks.
So that made me a part time cyborg for the duration of the chemotherapy. After the chemotherapy was ended and I no longer got the pump attached, and after I had the port removed, I am no longer a cyborg since I no longer have any mechanical parts.
My nephew Tom watched a lot of Dr. Who episodes as a child in the 1970s. And I think he contemptuously referred to Daleks as "Derlicts" or "Derelicts".
Here is some of my family history:
Henry Hurst was born in 1771 in Gwynedd township, Pa., and Jacob Demuth was born in 1779 in Lancaster Pennsylvania. In 1800 Henry Hurst married Eva (Lowman) Jauch who had been widowed in the 1793 yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia. Henry Hurst and wife Eva had a daughter Ann Frances Veronica Hurst in 1801 and eventually moved to Lancaster, PA.
By 1822 Henry Hurst and Jacob Demuth were both widowers. At the Moravian Church in Lancaster Henry Hurst married a niece of Jocob Demuth, who should have been about the age of her new stepdaughter and thus twenty to thirty years younger than her husband.. And a few days later the new stepdaughter Anne Frances Veronica Hurst got a new name when she married Jacob Demuth who was 22 years older. Both Henry Hurst and Jacob Demuth had children by those later marriages.
That made Anne Frances Veronica Hurst Demuth the half sibling of Henry Hurst's later children, as well as their grandaunt by marriage. It made the children of Henry Hurst's second marriage the grandnephews and grandnieces of Jacob Demuth and also his half brothers-in-law and half sisters-in-law.
Imaging trying to draw a family tree showing the relationships resulting from those marriages and other marriages of Jacob Demuth and his relatives I imagined it would get very complicated with relationship lines crisscrossing like crazy. So I made up a little genealogical rhyme:
"Oh what a tangled web we weave,
when first we practice to conceive"
Anyway, Henry Hurst had a daughter born when he was 60 or 61, and a son, Elam D. Hurst, who might have descendants to the present. Jacob Demuth and Anne Frances Veronica Hurst Demuth had nine children, including Henry Cornelius Demuth I, (1830-1906) one of my great great grandfathers.
Here is a link to a list of castles and vaguely castle-like buildings in the USA.
<url>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles_in_the_United_States</url>
Here is a link to an article about a castle in Haledon, New Jersey.
<url>https://www.northjersey.com/picture-gallery/news/passaic/haledon/2023/05/24/photo-gallery-haledon-nj-castle-cedar-cliff-avenue/11950579002/</url>
And the pictures of that castle don't look much like the castle in the movie to me. Is there another castle in Haledon, NJ?
I saw part of the movie Sat. 11-23-2024 and saw a couple of images of the castle.
And it looked to me like the artist was inspired by the Belem Tower in Lisbon, Portugal.
<url>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bel%C3%A9m_Tower</url>
This long article about matte paintings of spooky movie castles and mansions
<url>https://nzpetesmatteshot.blogspot.com/2011/11/creepy-castles-menacing-mansions.html</url>
Shows a matte painting of the castles by Russ Lawson, quite close to the top of the article. I am pleased to note that the tops of at least some of the turrets seem to be bulbous cupolas instead of cones.
Today Nov. 12 2024 I was reading that captured German pilots in the Battle of Britain were detained at Trent Park, Greater London. And the Wikipedia article on Trent Park says:
<blockquote>Trent Park was used as the location for scenes set in and around a boys' boarding school in the 1983 Doctor Who story, "Mawdryn Undead", featuring Peter Davison as the Fifth Doctor.[39]</blockquote>
Continued:
So should the joke scenes at the end of the episodes be considered to be part of the canon of the series, events which really happen in the series, or are they considered to be mere jokes about the series and not really happening in the series?
Some people might want the joke scenes to be real, and so make it canon that the kids sometimes reanimated the figurine. But there is another joke scene at the end of "Wizards vs Angels". In that episodes Max, previously turned into a girl named Maxine, brings some little girls from school home for a slumber party. During the course of the slumber party, the little girls are turned into old men, and then into talking fruit. In the joke scene at the end of "Wizards vs Angels", after the moral compass was turned back to good, and everyone has reverted to their normal behavior, the talking fruit, who had been old men, and little girls just hours before the scene, are telling dumb jokes. And one of the wizards threatens to put them in the blender if they tell another terrible joke. One of the talking fruits then tells another unfunny joke, and as the scene fades to black, the sound of a blender is heard.
So there seem to be a number of deaths of people and of magical beings who seem to probably be people, in <i>Wizards of Waverly Place</i> (2007-2012), And almost all of them are directly or indirectly caused by the teenage and preteen protagonists.
And those young protagonists have many magical abilities which mean that they can never be forced by circumstances to kill. But they kill anyway, in situations where killing is purely optional for them, presumably because they have no ethical objections to killing.
Continued:
In the fourth season, in "Journey to the Center of Mason" December 17, 2010, Mason turns into wolf form and swallows Dean, Alex's former boyfriend, whole, but the wizards enter his stomach and rescue Dean. And it is implied that if Alex loses her wizard powers she will be unable to be Mason's girlfriend, presumably because Mason would be too dangerous. Note that Mason, the person-eating werewolf, seems to be an accepted member of wizard society, but monster hunters shoot at Juliet and her vampire family with ray guns.
In "Three Maxes and a Little Lady" January 21m 2011, Max is accidentally turned into a little girl, Maxine.
In "Everything's Rosie for Justin" Feb. 4, 2011 Justin's new girlfriend turns out to be an angel. In "Dancing with Angels", Feb. 11, and "Wizards vs Angels", Feb. 18, Rosie turns out to be a dark angel working for Gorog, who is a satanic character. The moral compass is stolen, and set for evil, turning everyone evil. Gorog is defeated, and the moral compass turned back to good, and everyone becomes good again.
In "Pop Me and We Both Go Down" on January 6, 2008, a figurine on Mr. Russo's trophy was accidentally animated and ran away, as mentioned before. Mr. Russo ordered the kids to return it to the trophy and deanimate it. So Mr. Russo's selfish desire to retain his trophy intact made him order his kids to kill a living being, and one which seemed to be a person. In the end the figurine is deanimated, and the trophy restored.
But in the last scene, a joke scene, the figurine from the trophy was seen alive again, so according to that scene the Russo's occasionally reanimated him, which make killing him seem somewhat less evil than it otherwise would be
Continued:
Continued:
If you had the power to animate inanimate objects like Alex has, you could also use it to animate dead lifeforms. And if you killed someone in order to achieve some goal, and had the power to bring the dead back to life, you would immediately bring that person back to life, once you achieved your goal. Any decent person would do the same. But none of the wizards in training present made any move to reanimate Stevie. Then Max, the kid who released many deadly monsters into New York City, accidentally knocked Stevie over and Stevie shattered into many pieces.
And of course they could have used the spell to reassemble broken objects to put Stevie back together, and then another spell to reanimate Stevie, but nobody indicated any desire to do so.
And that ended the plot of "The Good, the Bad, and the Alex". The episode ended with a final scene, a joke about unrelated matters.
And of course the writers could have made the final scene one in which Alex is told that Stevie is calling from wizard prison, and Alex is asked if she wanted to take the call. And they could have shown Stevie in Wizard prison with faint lines crisscrossing her face. And a passing prisoner could compliment Stevie on her outstanding facial tattoos, and Stevie could snarl that they weren't tattoos but where she was put back together right before being brought back to life.
But they didn't, so as far as the viewers knew Stevie stayed dead forever. So kids who thought that the protagonists were good kids would learn the lesson that it is alright to treacherously kill someone. And also that people with the power to bring dead people back to life have no ethical obligation to do so, even when they themselves have killed them.
And so the episode ended with the young protagonists having a good time while on the floor all around them were scattered the many pieces of the horribly mutilated corpse of the girl they had just killed.
In "Wizards Unleased" October 1, 2010, they free Mason, in wolf form, from a group of "wizbillies", hillbilly wizards. Alex makes a deal with the wizbillies, but instead of keeping her word tricks them through a portal leading to "some void". And I have to wonder how survivable "some void" entered through a magical portal would be.
Continued:
Continued:
I note that in a 4th season episode Harper asked if Jeremy had been found, which implies that he had still not returned home or been contacted. So at the best Jeremy had been separated from and out of contact with family, friends, and home for months, and at worst he had been killed almost instantly.
In <i>Wizards of Waverly Place</i> the Wizard World has a rule that only one child in a family of wizards can win the family's wizard competition. The losing kids in a wizard competition lose all their powers after having been dependent on them for all their previous years of life. And the reason for that rule is unknown and many wizard laws and rules seem rather senseless.
In the next episode "The Good, the Bad, and the Alex" May 7, 2010, they learn that Stevie is the leader of a revolution against the wizarding competition, with thousands of wizard kids behind her. And Justin immediately says that means Stevie is evil. Justin didn't think Stevie was evil from sending a kid to an unknown and probably instantly lethal location, but thought that Stevie was evil for leading a rebellion against a rule which seems senseless and tyrannical to many viewers.
Alex pretends to join Stevie's rebellion, and tricks Stevie into touching the machine which is supposed to transfer Stevie's wizard powers to her brother Warren. And then she magically immobilizes Stevie while transferring Stevie's powers to Warren. She immobilizes Stevie by turning Stevie into non living matter, which is a euphemistic way of saying she kills Stevie.
Continued:
Continued:
In the episode 'Third Wheel", April 30 2010, Alex and Harper ask Stevie, a new girl at school, if she is a wizard. Stevie says yes and demonstrates by making a portal appear in the floor under a boy who falls through it. Harper says the boy was Jeremy from science who was going to ask her to dance. Alex asks Stevie where she sent Jeremy and Stevie says she doesn't know, and Alex says that is the type of irresponsible wizarding she likes.
Anyone who knows anything about science know that even if human habitable planets were was common in real life as in Star Trek, Teh vast, bast majority of locatins in the universe would still be almost instantly lethal to humans. Even if Stevie's spell transported Jeremy to an unknown location somewhere on the surface of Earth instead of to an unknown location anywhere in the universe, he would have only a 25 percent chance of still being alive at the end of the scene.
I also note that Harper seems a little upset by what happened to Jeremy, but is not seen asking either Alex or Stevie to try to bring back Jeremy alive. My theory about Harper not asking is that in offscreen events Harper has seen Alex and Justin make a lot of other students disappear and so is used to it.
Maybe there is some sort of magic limitation put on the magic abilities of wizards in training which makes their spells unable to permanently harm anyone. So if Alex, Stevie, and Harper know that in "Third Wheel" then their lack of excitement about Stevie sending Jeremy to an unknown location could be due to knowing all spells of wizards in training are essentially harmless. So in that case Stevie would not have murdered Jeremy and Alex would not be an accomplice his murder, but would still be guilty of other murders.
Continued:
Continued:
In "Franken Girl", the first episode of the third season Justin creates a monster "Franken Girl", who thinks that Justin is her father, In the third episode "Monster Hunter", Justin becomes a monster hunter, and Max releases a lot of monsters from a book into New York City, thus endangering millions of people.
In "Three Monsters" monster hunters come hunting for Juliet and her family, shooting at them with ray guns. If the worst that vampires do is mind control, isn't that using excessive force? And if vampires kill people, whydidn't the wizards warn Harper of that danger? Justin manages to make the monster hunters go away by giving them "Franken Girl", the monster he created and who thinks of him as her father. So much for the love of a creator for their creation. In "Night at the Lazerama" all the other monster hunters have been killed, include the pair from "Three Monsters", so Justin is sent after a mind controlling mummy, but the mummy eventually enslaves Juliet. And I wonder how many other persons beside the monster hunters have been killed by the monsters released by Max.
In "Alex Charms a Boy" she meets a new boy at school, from England, named Mason.
In "Wizards vs Werewolves" it is revealed Mason is a werewolf. In Transylvania they find the mummy and unwrap him, turning him into dust, even though with all their wizard spells they should be able to stop themMummy without harming him. Mason knew Juliet 300 years ago in England, so why does he still go to school with kids centuries younger? Maybe in order to meet - and maybe eat - girls. Mason is turned into a wolf permanently and Juliet is turned into her true age - and she used to date Julius Caesar. So it would be natural for the audience to assume Juliet turned into dust like the mummy soon after the end of the episode.
Continued:
reply to CuriousUserX90.
In a "caravan"? Do you mean that he will sleep in a long line of cargo carrying camels crossing the desert?
That is what "caravan" means to me and other people in the USA. But possibly Pete will sleep in what British people call a caravan and Americans call a recreational vehicle or RV.
"A recreational vehicle, often abbreviated as RV, is a motor vehicle or trailer that includes living quarters designed for accommodation.[1] Types of RVs include motorhomes, campervans, coaches, caravans (also known as travel trailers and campers), fifth-wheel trailers, popup campers, and truck campers."
Or maybe Pete will rent an apartment or a hotel room or stay with friends while the house in being rebuilt.
Why are you surprised by characters in a western having oddball names? Do you think that there is something about the western genre which demands that all characters have common names? Or do you think that everyone in the wild west had a common ordinary name?
Like Wyatt Earp, for example, was a common name.
You mean the big central stairs that go down from the big doors on the courtyard to the ground floor?
Or do you mean looking up one of the side flights which goes up to a upper floor?
<url>https://www.ihearthollywood.com/2018/11/greystone-mansion-is-opening-its-doors.html</url>
If that is supposed to be a room in a penthouse atop of a Manhattan apartment building that is one place where I didn't expect to see it.
And today I checked the locations for filming <i>Quincannon, Frontier Scout</i> (1956), and they include:
<ulr>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049647/locations/?ref_=ttrel_sa_4</url>
The Kanab movie fort, Kanab, Utah, as the main fort in <i>Quincannon, Frontier Scout</i>, and Pipe Spring, Arizona, which has a small stone fort built by settlers.
"We don't need no stinking Lt. Dunbar" Part Six.
Of course the Great Sioux War of 1876-77 is the setting for many movies, some giving the date. <i>They Died With Their Boots On</i> (1941) gives the date of Custer's Last Stand as June 25. The<i>Time Tunnel</i> episode "Massacre" happens on June 24 & 25, 1876. A title card in <i>Custer's Last Fight</i> (1912, 1925) gives the date of Custer's Last Stand as June 25, 1876. The opening title card of <i>Red Tomahawk</i> (1967) says that Custer's Last stand happened June 25, 1876. In <i>Winchester '73</i> (1950), between July 4 and 9, 1876, various characters learn about Custer's Last Stand.
But then there is <i>The Savage</i> (1952). The date is 20 years after some time in the Civil War, and thus about 1881-1885. James Aherne/Warbonnet, was adopted by a Miniconjou Sioux chief at the age of 11 in 1868, and thus should have been born in 1856-57, and about 18 to 20 during the Great Sioux War, and about 24 to 29 during the movie. But the Sioux wonder if he will be loyal to them or to the whites. Wasn't he old enough to be a warrior in the Great Sioux War, and thus should have shown what side his loyalties were on then?
So maybe <i>The Savage</i> (1952) happens in an alternate universe where there was peace with the Sioux from 1868 to the 1880s and the Great Sioux War never happened. Or maybe the Great Sioux War did happen, but Warbonnet was sick or disabled by an injury for over a year during the course of the war and couldn't show where his loyalties were. Or maybe he was a prisoner of the whites or an enemy tribe during the war and later escaped.
In 1877 the Northern Cheyenne were sent south to the Indian Territory, and some of them returned north in 1878. According to the movie <i>White Feather</i> (1955), in 1877 the Sioux, Blackfoot, Arapaho, and Cheyenne signed treaties to move south, though only the northern Cheyenne did so in real life. And if that happened in the same fictional universe as <i>The Savage</i>(1952), what are all those unconquered Sioux still doing in the north years later. Where they a subgroup of the Sioux who refused to move, or did they go south and then return north like the Cheyenne did?
<i>The Glory Guys</i> (1965) features a major campaign against the Sioux sometime after Fort Doniphan was founded in 1867. And it is uncertain when it happens in relation to other Sioux movies.
The tv movie <i>Kenny Rogers as The Gambler, Part III: The Legend Continues</i> (November 22 & 24, 1987) has the protagonists involved with the Ghost Dance troubles but manage to bring about a happy ending, so apparently Sitting Bull is not killed and the Wounded Knee Massacre never happens in that film.
So if someone only head about the Sioux Wars from watching <i>Flaming Frontier</i> (1958), <i>Dances with Wolves</i> (1990), <i>The Savage</i> (1952), and <i>Kenny Rogers as The Gambler, Part III: The Legend Continues</i> (November 22 & 24, 1987) they would think there were a lot fewer Sioux Wars than there actually were.
Continued.
If the scriptwriters assumed a modern January 20 inauguration date, Cody & the troops could have left in July about 6 months earlier.
Possibly General Blazier returned to the fort with Cody & McGraw in January or March of 1877 or later. And possibly he was sent back to Kansas to "hold down the fort(s)" or something sometime the cavalry reinforcements reached General Crook.
So possibly Blazier was was the general in command at fort Wallace who told Colonel Valois that Hanu's Arapahos wouldn't attack Fort Clenendin some time in or before November 1876.
If different western movies happen in the same fictional universe, we can guess the possible identity of the general at Fort Wallace who told Col. Valois that Hanu and his Arapahos would never dare to attack Fort Clendendin because it was too close to other forts like Wallace, Doge, Hays, Bascom, and Garland.
In <i> Buffalo Bill</i> (1944) scout William "Buffalo Bill" Cody spends time near a fort. At one point he rides to the fort and says he saw a Cheyenne war party "on the left [North] bank of the Smokey" & "twenty miles from here". So the Fort must be on the Smoky Hills River that flows mostly eastward in Kansas or within 20 miles of it.
Fort Riley, Kansas, is at 39°06′N 96°49′W and at the Junction of the Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers. Fort Hays, Kansas was at 38°51′42″N 99°20′32″W and about 10 miles north of the Smoky Hill River. Fort Wallace, Kansas. was at 38°54′18″N 101°33′34″W and about a mile from the nearest bends of the Smoky Hill river.
Early in the movie, Sgt. Chips McGraw delivers mail around the fort. There is also a Colonel and a (brigadier) General Blazier. At least two years after the beginning the Great Sioux War of 1876-77 begins. At one point General Blazier tells Cody about the Battles of the Rosebud and Little Bighorn (17 and 25 June) and Cody guides the troops from the fort to reinforce General Crook, and they fight Cheyenne at Warbonnet Gorge, based on a real fight on July 17.
Cody and Sgt. McGraw Later return to the fort after 6 months away, & Cody gets a message to go East. The opening narration dates the trip east to 1877. Sgt. McGraw says the president is new to the job, making it after the inauguration of Hayes on March 5, 1877. Six months before March 4, 1877 would be about September 4, 1876, which doesn't add up. Maybe Cody & McGraw returned to the Fort sometime and then rejoined the campaign against the Sioux.
Continued
"We don't need no stinking Lt. Dunbar" Part Five.
Or maybe in the fictional universe of <i>Dances With Wolves</i> (1990) there were only a few dozen soldiers sent to fight the Sioux in 1863 and 1864, and their mission was merely to capture Lt. Dunbar, and not to punish the Teton Sioux for harboring Santee Sioux terrorists. And maybe in the fictional universe of <i>Dances With Wolves</i> (1990) there were only a few hundred Teton Sioux in one camp instead of tens of thousands with thousands of warriors.
The Santee Sioux uprising in 1862 is featured only in <i>Flaming Frontier</i>(1958) where a peace treaty ends the uprising and it happens on a very small scale compared to most western movies, let alone to the actual uprising.
And as far as I can tell <i>Dances With Wolves</i> (1990) ignores the largest battles and campaigns of the western Indian Wars as if they didn't exist in its fictional universe.
What about the First Sioux War of 1854-55, including the Grattan Massacre on August 19, 1854 and the Battle of Ash Hollow on Sept 3, 1855? <i>Chief Crazy Horse</i> (1955) opens in 1854 with Sioux chief Conquering Bear, mortally wounded in a fight with the white men, makes a prophecy about a great leader of the Sioux. And there is no mention of the Grattan Massacre or any other event of the First Sioux War.
Red Cloud's War of 1866-1868 is given its correct dates in the narration to <i>Tomahawk</i> (1951). And there are other movies based more loosely on it, with Red Cloud attacking forts. <i>The Last Frontier/Savage Wilderness</i> (1956) happens in 1863 or 1864. <i>The Yellow Tomahawk</i> (1954) happens after 1864. <i>The Indian Fighter</i> (1955) should happen in 1865. <i>Run of the Arrow</i>(1957) begins in 1865 but may end in 1866. <i>The Gun That Won the West</i>(1955) has a more uncertain date. And I don't know the fictional dates of <i>Warrior Gap</i> (1925) and <i>Spoilers of the West</i> (1927).
continued.
"We don't need no stinking Lt. Dunbar" Part Four.
Meanwhile, gold had been discovered in western Montana in 1862, starting the Montana Gold Rush. Gold seekers on the west coast rushed on various trails eastward to western Montana. And gold rushers on the east coast or the midwest took wagon trains overland northwest to western Montana. Or they took steamboats from Missouri or Nebraska up the Missouri River to Fort Benton, Montana, the head of navigation, and then went overland to the mining regions. Some Sioux harassed wagon trains or shot at steamboats.
So that was another reason to send expeditions against the Teton Sioux.
In 1864 General Alfred Sully established Fort Rice on the Missouri River and marched west with over 2,000 men and eight howitzers, toward a reported vast village of Sioux. Warriors from the village rode out to fight and give time for their camp to retreat at the Battle of Killdeer Mountain on July 28-29, 1864. They were led by Gall, Sitting Bull, Inkpaduta, and others.
Sully then pursued the Sioux through the Badlands. His command Fought the Sioux Warriors in the Battle of the Badlands on August 7, 8, & 9, 1864. Sully's command then marched to the Yellowstone River where there were two steamboats with supplies, and then marched down the Yellowstone and Missouri rivers back to civilization.
And some viewers of <i>Dances With Wolves</i> (1990) believe that it ends in 1864, not in 1863. And thus the band of Sioux Dunbar was with should have met other Sioux with news of current events, including the huge battles at Killdeer Mountain and the Badlands. So I guess that Lt. Dunbar would have been very egotistical if he thought that expeditions of not dozens, not hundreds, but thousands, of soldiers were sent to fight the Sioux just to punish him for desertion.
Continued: