I have a 7 year old who's trying to watch fucking Lego Masters and this trailer comes up every other ad. Not to mention there's a line about "having sex with Dumbledorf" or something. It's just wildly inappropriate for a young child who's just trying to watch people build with Lego.
Your child will see far more graphic things on the internet on the daily once he starts browsing the web on his own, this is nothing to worry about.
The children in your psychotic, perverted family might, but non-pervs are generally aware of and prone to implement Internet filters that accompany most routers and web security software.
reply share
People can say anything they want on here, and there is zero chance they will be banned, have their posts deleted, etc. It's like 4chan, but with less moderation.
Love how the libs blame everything on homophobia - how convenient to always have that card to pull. It could've been two women, man/woman, talking about having sex with dumbledorf and I'd feel the same. The topic of sex is something the parents should control....not fucking Hulu during Lego Masters.
I LOOKED INTO THIS LEGO MASTERS...IT IS A REALITY SHOW ON FOX HOSTED BY WILL ARNETT FEATURING ADULT CONTESTANTS...IT FEATURES MORE INNUENDO AND QUESTIONABLE FOR A SEVEN YEAR OLD MOMENTS THAN ANY TRAILER...HOLY BRICK!
You know kids can look at MovieChat too right? How would you feel about your child reading a response like that? Would it be better for them to see people telling others to put peanut butter on their dick and have a dog go down on it than seeing an ad for a gay romcom?
You know that only an illiterate retard would be incapable of preventing their children from learning their obscure moviechat forum handle, right? And that's even if they manage to get access to your computer or phone.
reply share
What difference does it make if the child knows who says these words? The fact is that it’s totally hypocritical to complain about children being exposed to inappropriate material then in the same breath spout inappropriate words that children can be exposed to.
That's the problem. For decades, the gay movement was just considered silly and dismissed as such until now, suddenly, we have drag queen story hours for preschoolers.
They achieved that way back in the 90s. Ever since then it's been more towards pushing their lifestyle and deviations into the mainstream and influencing children to accept it.
So is that what straight people do? I mean you can't really choose your sexuality can you? When did you decide to be straight? If movies featuring gay people caused kids to be gay, don't you think that there wouldn't be any gay people because of all the movies over the last 100 years which only featured straight folk?
Tell me, why is accepting people such a bad thing? Children already accept until they are taught not to. So who is really the "groomers"?
Straight is the default position. You do not have to choose it.
I'm firmly convinced that homosexuality is not something you are born with, or a conscious choice, but a product of influences that occur in your formative years. All other sexual deviations from heterosexuality are deemed to be a result of this. Why should homosexuality be any different?
It's just that it is a more common and more socially acceptable kink than say, zoophilia or necrophilia or pedophilia. It has much more backing and also gay-friendly scientists who were willing to put forward the "born that way" theory to legitimize it above other sexual kinks.
You are not gay because you were born that way, but because you had childhood experiences that caused your psyche to relate sexual attraction with members of your own sex. Maybe someone else could have had the same experiences but not reacted so drastically. It's a combination of experiences and reactions that make one gay.
Yes, so you think that throughout history, in places where you will be killed for being that way, people choose it? Yeah....not so sure about that.
I can tell you've never struggled with your sexuality. That's great. I'm glad that you've not been through that. But where is your proof that's it's experiences that makes one "choose" their sexuality? What sort of reactions are you talking about? If it were a choice, do you not think that those poor kids being forced to go through conversion therapy wouldn't just choose to be straight?
Speaking of conversion therapy, I've not seen any of that sort on the gay side of things. So again, I'm curious, who are the ones trying to force people to be like them?
Obviously you neglected to read my post. You are not born gay AND you do not choose to be gay. You are gay due to childhood experiences that made you associate sexual feelings with a person of the same sex.
This is the case with all other sexual deviations from the norm. How could homosexuality be different in some magical way? It's caused, like all other kinks, by getting your wires crossed during your formative years.
And as for your last point, legitimizing homosexuality in the media and as entertainment for children is going to lead to more and more kids getting their wires crossed and associating sexual feelings with persons of their own sex and developing the kink of homosexuality. That's how they are converting kids.
The science on this is inconclusive. You might be right but I suspect it’s a spectrum - from extremely effeminate ‘camp’ men who were born-this-way to people who might be straight but for some early childhood experiences, to sexually fluid people who tip more towards same-sex, to teens who just want to annoy their parents or get attention.
Apparently there’s a correlation between homosexuality and men who have many older brothers, could be something to do with testosterone in the womb.
Who knows, but I do know that pushing sex stuff on kids is fucked up and needs to stop now.
Do you have a link about the correlation between homosexuality and older brothers? My bro-in-law is gay and happens to have an older bro, but I had never heard of that before.
You are gay due to childhood experiences that made you associate sexual feelings with a person of the same sex.
Okay, if it's not a choice, and the only people in your life are straight people, then how do gay people exist if not by inherently already having those attractions within them. You are saying that you don't choose who you are attracted to. Great, I agree. But if you are from a small town of only straight people, and don't watch tv and movies with gay people (because let's face it, that's a really new thing in pop culture) how do gay people exist? How did they exist before movies and tv? How do animals get into same sex relationships?? https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/homosexual-animals-debate
From 2004 just incase you feel it's new woke propaganda
Again...the only people who are actively trying to convert kids are the ones who are using conversion therapy to make kids straight. Is that a kink of straight people? Forcing others to be just like them?
reply share
It could be something as simple as dad or grandpa rubbing your willie too hard when they wash you. Or seeing something in a movie or TV show, or experimentation with other kids.
How do people become zoophiles, or necrophiles, or pedophiles when nobody in their life is that way? They are all kinks that occur when a child associates sexual gratification with a non-traditional thing. Homosexuality is more acceptable because it usually involves consenting adult partners, but it is still a kink.
Homosexuality in animals is dominance behavior. I doubt the alpha bull who mounts a submissive bull is actually sticking it up his backside, anyway, so it's not really homosexuality.
And the gay community is using a very, very sneaky form of conversion therapy with drag queen story times and gay cartoon characters. A certain percentage of vulnerable kids will be triggered by their experience and develop the homosexual kink as a result of exposure.
I'd really like to see the science that backs up anything that you are saying.
And the gay community is using a very, very sneaky form of conversion therapy with drag queen story times and gay cartoon characters. A certain percentage of vulnerable kids will be triggered by their experience and develop the homosexual kink as a result of exposure.
So you are admitting that having straight people have story time is a form on converting people to heterosexual behaviours. That certain percentage of vulnerable kids certainly wouldn't be straight without the guidance of straight cartoon characters.
I already told you, straight is the default position and nobody needs to be converted to it.
And you haven't yet clarified why homosexuality is any different from all the other sexual deviations that we all accept as kinks. Why is it that we don't think someone is born wanting to have sex with animals or corpses or kids, but definitely they can be born wanting to have gay sex?
I guess you haven't read any of the studies that I've shared with you. Ones who claim to have evidence that there is a genetic factor in sexual orientation. So I don't have to clarify when I have provided scientific studies to do that for me.
I also don't really consider pedophilia, beastiality, or necrophilia to be kinks any more than I would consider rape to be a kink, as all of those activities are down without consent. I think it may be important to know the difference between a kink and mental illness.
All those "drag queen story hours" and gay Disney characters are artificially providing the trigger of homosexuality that used to occur accidentally. They are deliberately crossing the wires of developing children and causing them to have sexual feelings for person of their own sex.