Is this a joke?
The title looks like it came out of a comedy writers room at five o'clock on a Friday afternoon.
shareThe title looks like it came out of a comedy writers room at five o'clock on a Friday afternoon.
shareYou should watch it...
shareSome people did watch it. Including those who were slandered and are now suing the producers.
https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-entertainment-movies-crime-b3131ff301d8a418cfc6b0860c52b5e9
Why? Do you not understand the term "mule" in this context?
shareIs serious documentary by serious people. Is no joke.
sharehhahaha hahaha hahahahah ahahhaha hha
Thats too funny .
Is it on youtube ?
I might give it a watch on "crazy conspiracy comedy night"
watched "the men who stare at goats" last time .
Have a double feature including Adam Schiff's "I Have Proof of Russian Collusion."
shareRep. Schiff on CNN: Evidence of Collusion is Clear, Mueller Will Find Out if There's Been a Crime
On Thursday, January 10, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, joined Alisyn Camerota on CNN's New Day to discuss the private Trump Campaign polling data former Trump Campaign Chair Paul Manafort gave to someone linked to Russian Intelligence during the 2016 campaign and his concerns about the nomination of William Barr to be the next Attorney General, who would oversee Mueller’s investigation. Schiff also discussed the troubling possibility that President Trump may declare a national emergency to build his wall without approval from Congress or the American people. Schiff is Co-Chair of the Congressional Freedom of the Press Caucus, and he discussed the bipartisan event to remember Jamal Khashoggi on the 100th day after his murder. The event was planned to acknowledge the need to protect journalists around the world, the life and work of Khashoggi and the 52 other journalists killed in 2018.
Maybe so, but it's content is rather effective and does show voter fraud in the 2020 Election that every Liberal in the world will deny, but that's generally what happens when you don't open your eyes
shareIt doesn't. It shows what people suspect to be voter fraud. And want to be voter fraud. If it actually showed voter fraud, then there would be a conviction on that evidence. But there isn't. Because it doesn't "show" voter fraud. The idea that you can't make a case for voter fraud when you have evidence just because "every liberal in the world" denies it, is a childlike and childish crumb of comfort. And means that you NEVER have to prove your theories to be true. Convenient.
share