This show was a nice tidy package destined for a short-run. But people whined and cried and felt entitled to another season. So now you're probably gonna have some hacked-up up garbage-story that tarnishes and ruins anything good about season 1. I can't believe Paramount caved for a S2.
shareThere's rumors getting around that, while "1883" is over, we might get another "Yellowstone" prequel called "1932", around the time of the prohibition and the Great Depression: https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a39096738/1883-season-two/
share1883 was leaps and bounds better than Yellowstone, not sure why it was one season and then kill off all your major characters. Elsa was a great character too.
sharePlease don't put spoilers in title. Having said that, I'm glad she's dead :)
shareSo where did you hear that there will be a season 2?
shareI've just finished ep. 7.
I'm watching it only because peeps said nearly everyone died, so it makes no sense for there to be a second season.
Having said that..... successful US tv shows usually run well beyond their welcome. Limited TV series are rather rare in the US, because if there's ever a limited tv show and it becomes successful, the 'limited' bit no longer applies and we get 5 more seasons, each one worse than the previous one, until we get to the final season which nobody even bothers to watch.
What’s up with the spoiler directly in your title? C’mon man
shareNot to mention we now have 1923, not to mention the original Yellowstone. We know the Duttons get there, we know they keep the land. It's a bit like watching a film about the Titanic and pretending you don't know the ending.
share