MovieChat Forums > The Fighter (2010) Discussion > Bale is a distractingly bad actor

Bale is a distractingly bad actor


This has always bothered me: It takes an actor without any sense of subtlety whatsoever for people to sit back and say, "What a great actor." Throughout The Fighter, it felt as though Bale was winking to the camera, saying, "Look at me, everybody! I'm acting! Now where's my Oscar?" I was constantly taken out of the film because of Bale's distractingly self-conscious performance.

Good actors work with such subtlety that their performances go unnoticed, and, unfortunately, are often not recognized. Bale's performance in The Fighter is just the opposite: Loud, self-conscious, and totally distracting.

EDIT: This thread won't die, largely because the majority of people replying are misunderstanding my argument. For that reason, I'll reiterate the clarification I made earlier:

It's possible to play a loud character and do it right. For example, the character of Taketoki Washizu in Akira Kurosawa's Throne of Blood is one that requires a broad performance. Toshirô Mifune delivers just that in a way that keeps me engaged in the film from beginning to end.

By contrast to Mifune's performance, Christian Bale broadcasts the fact that he's acting in a way that takes me out of the movie. My problem isn't with the loud character--my problem is the way Bale performs the character in a manner that makes him seem like he is acting, thereby taking me out of the film, rather than seamlessly embodying the character as a good actor should.

reply

Watch the real-life Dickie-- Christian did an amazing job capturing all of his irritating nuances and true-to-life inflections.


kierstin-happyphotos.blogspot.com

reply

I would agree that Bale is guilty of this for some of his roles but in The Fighter, he played an over confident crack head very well.

reply

Well to each their own but I totally disagree. I think he is a wonderful actor and all of the awards he got for The Fighter were well deserved.

reply

There are obvious bad actors, you can see them in B-movies and even sometimes A movies like Channing Tatum. However, I don't understand people who can break down and dissect the not so obvious like Leo DiCaprio, Tom Cruise, Christian Bale.... These guys are obviously good actors. If they are bad, then it is not obvious, and I don't believe the layman can see it. And the OP of this thread is a laymen. Maybe a Deniro or a Dustin Hoffman can critique them, but certainly not couch potatoes. Couch potatoes should stick to criticizing the obvious bad actors, or any pretty face Hollywood tries to fabricate as A-list actors. But Bale? C'mon... I don't know much about acting to criticise Bale, but I've seen enough and know enough to criticise Channing Tatum. Understand what I'm saying?

reply

[deleted]

Dicky isn't a subtle character. He's a wild nutjob.

Heart attack never stop ol' Big Bear!

reply

How would you have an over the top crazy drug addict act? Do you expect them to be subtle? Bale was amazing.

<3 1958-2009 <3 Gone too soon...

reply

The original poster knows nothing about film or acting, I'm pretty sure of that.

reply

If you were annoyed with his acting in the fighter then that means he did it brilliantly because that was exactly the point.He was a crackhead in that role and he did it pretty good. You wouldn't even think he was the Dark Knight actor in the role he played in The Fighter. I'm not a fan of bale but he did his role well.



* Natural vitamins http://www.naturalcholesterolsupplements.com *

reply

I've seen interviews of the real Dicky E., and he was spot on. Maybe look at how well he portrayed the real person, instead of being annoyed and writing an unjust critique.

reply

Also, for a lot of the movie Bale's character actually was winking at the camera since he thought there was a documentary about his comeback being made. After that part he was much more laid back in his role. The fact that he was able to perfectly portray both of those in this film made it good.

reply

OP doesn't know what he's talking about.. on so many levels. bale's performance, imo, kinda upstaged whalberg's performance/character. i forgot that dicky was even christian bale at some point.

reply

Put me in the camp that believes it was an excellent performance by a great actor. On the issue of subtlety, the character is certainly not a subtle or introverted person. At many times, he is actually on crack and I think he played that mental state very well.

But I still found many subtle parts in Bale's performance even though he was playing a loon. The brief scene where's he speaking into the HBO camera about what it feels like on crack was extremely subtle. In the scene where Micky and Charlene are in the house w/ the whole family talking about possibly moving to Vegas, Bale calms everyone down and says, "Mick, what's the problem?" etc. This scene was very underrated and subtle and showed Dickie's caring/manipulative side when he wasn't being a loud boaster.

reply

Did you watch the credits of the movie? The part with the real Dickie?

Visit my movie review site!

http://hesaidshesaidmovies.tripod.com/index.html

reply

I'm succumbing to my masochistic tendencies and dipping my toes into this thread once more.

Yes, I did see the end credits with the real Dickie. Christian Bale and Dicky Eklund were proven to be such vastly different personalities in that scene that I had to assume it was given us to compare and contrast. It honestly stuns me that people here think the two were even remotely similar.

reply

Christian Bale and Dicky Eklund were proven to be such vastly different personalities in that scene that I had to assume it was given us to compare and contrast.


I'm convinced you watched another movie named The Fighter after that comment. That or you're literally blind.

Visit my movie review site!

http://hesaidshesaidmovies.tripod.com/index.html

reply