The viral marketing contributed a lot, no question
The people who still thought it was 100% real probably put butts in the seats, as did people who'd heard the story behind the filming (i.e., that it was completely improvised, shot exclusively by the actors who really did camp out in the forest for days, etc.)
But that only worked for opening weekend. It did well afterwards because it was well made and told a compelling "lost in the woods" story.
It's worth note that this film was "made" in editing (same as nearly all films to be fair). By that I mean, they would show it at a film festival, getting lots of feedback, then re-edit and show it at another film festival.
By the time Artisan picked it up, it had been shown and re-shown so often that it was effectively audience-vetted and ready for the big screen.
It's kind of fascinating, not just for its guerrilla film-making but its guerrilla editing and guerrilla marketing.
reply
share