MovieChat Forums > Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion > WTF ... why is this here?

WTF ... why is this here?


Seriously ... what comment can go here that is not going to be political? Except this one, of course.

reply

Has he been in any movies?

reply

A few gory home movies

reply

yes i remember watching a badass heartwarming epic when this guy kills a pedo, a wife beater, and some other fucking degenerate in self defense. Godbless this hero, cleaned up the streets from filth

reply

I have spoken to you on a friendly basis on movies before. It saddens me to see you supporting this murderer and using the wily words of his defense attorney to justify his killings. Don't bother responding to me. I have no interest in getting into a debate on this matter. THIS KID IS NOT A HERO. WAKE UP!

reply

More reasons why these pages shouldn't even be on here. I'd rather just have conversations with people about movies, and get riled up about those, because at least, it's just movies.

reply

True

reply

he was attacked by a mob and fought back after they tried to disarm him and assault him. this guy didnt murder anyone he was just trying to keep the peace and protect private property from anarchy and destruction when a bunch of antifa hoodlums decided to attack. never bring a skateboard to gunfight it is not going to end well. what was he supposed to do? be assaulted by an anonymous mob of crazies and get his head smashed in to the concrete and or shot with his own weapon?!?

reply

Enough please. Have some dignity.

reply

i might not have much dignity but it is exponentially more than any of his attackers had. the government slaps pedos on the wrist this guy slaps them to hell he should be admired

reply

YOu're either blind, ignorant or a brainwashed moron.


Your choice.

reply

He's the definition of a hero. Then again, there were no doubt many who considered Paul Revere or George Washington to be "the bad guys."

reply

Brother---you are propping up a killer and espousing ideas not dissimilar to the Third Reich. Please do mot continue down this dark path which in your ignorance and rabid hatred you assume to be the correct one. Dark minds have enslaved you. FREE YOURSELF!

reply

You wouldn't know the Third Reich if it shut down the country, destroyed the supply chain, made hundreds of thousands of people jobless, forced a vaccine on people and all whilst telling you you're evil if you're the wrong colour.

reply

Maybe you're right, and the guys in the black masks and boots running around beating people with pipes for the terrible crime of speaking their opinions in public are the good guys.

reply

you, sire, are correct.

reply

He needs to use benzoil peroxide on that acne problem

reply

He needs the acne and the chub so he can pretend to be the young dumb pimple-faced fat kid next-door and not the deliberate murderer that he really is, in court.

reply

You are beyond lost. I feel sorry for you.

reply

I don't understand it either. This is "Moviechat". There are plenty of other boards for discussions about other people not related to movies and entertainment,

reply

Yeah, I really don't get why people on moviechat are obsessed with talking about politics.
There's even a politics board, but it doesn't mean shit.

It's like, do you guys have nowhere else to go? No one to talk to? You have to come to a place called moviechat?

reply

The fact that this loser has a page on this site is baffling.

reply

perhaps it is time we all start REPORTING these non-movie related peoples and postings?

reply

We can police ourselves. We are not the cancel culture which is precisely what you proppse.

reply

im far from a canceller. this area is for movie stuff.... why is some non-movie guy listed at all?

reply

This is really weird. The IMDB page (and the page here) specifically says "Not associated with the alleged shooter in Kenosha," but then it's ALL about that guy, with his news appearances listed as "additional crew" credits. Is there some other person in the movie industry with the same name, who everybody is confusing for the other one?

reply

He will get off.But at least he will have a trail. Alec Baldwin doesn't even think he needs one.

reply

Alec is not a cold-blooded murderer.

reply


I agree, but neither is Rittenhouse. In fact, at least Rittenhouse pulled the trigger to save his life, not make a cheap buck.


reply

> I agree, but neither is Rittenhouse.

I disagree. His blood is at best room temperature in Wisconsin.

He can't say he pulled a trigger to save his life when he just murdered someone and was being pursued for it. That's like saying he had to shoot that cop because the cop might have eventually had to shoot him. Doesn't wash one bit.

reply

Two questions for you. Do you know what the definition of murder is? And you know he was being pursued by baldy child rapist Rosenbaum when that first engagement and subsequent death took place?

So yeah, he can say he pulled the trigger to save his life. Even the prosecution admit that.

reply

baldy child rapist huh?

reply

Oh. You didn't know? The bald fuck that chased down Kyle kicking this whole thing off was charged by a grand jury with 11 counts of child molestation and inappropriate sexual activity around children, including anal rape. The victims were five boys ranging in age from 9 to 11 years old.

What do you think about that?

reply

Leftists approve of such behavior.

reply

Fascists always insult their opponents instead of dealing with the arguments.

reply

From what I've seen, fascists are incapable of being reasoned with, so I don't bother.

reply

Socrates said “To know thyself is [only] the beginning of wisdom.”

reply

I hope you're working on it.

reply

If Michael Jackson rose from the grave and was chasing him - you don't have the right to murder someone as you are advocating for in your idealized fascist state.

reply

In USA you have the right to self defend yourself.

And THAT is a fact.

reply

You are not claiming that, you are claiming an absolute right that does not exist ... no matter how much times you reply to me, you are simply wrong.

reply

There are no absolute rights. And I'm not referring to the legal meaning but the absolute meaning.

If you are referring to the legal definition, in no way did I state that the right to self defense is an absolute right.

You are simply wrong and ignorant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/26/self-defense-is-a-constitutional-right/

https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/self-defense-overview.html
"Self-defense is defined as the right to prevent suffering force or violence through the use of a sufficient level of counteracting force or violence. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_self-defense

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/amendment-ii/interps/99

https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIB17.htm

reply

I'm getting really sick of your distractions, and lies, and dishonesty.

Mostly the pointless insults. I'm not insulting you, but you will insult me if I do not accept your lies ... like Republicans do.

reply

What are the lies???

Are you saying that the supreme court is spewing lies??? The constitution is a lie?

All I did was to present the sources.

reply

Errr, what relevance is that? You questioned my description of that piece if shit Rosenbaum and I explained.

Question for you. Would you say your ideals align with communism/socialism?

reply

Calling me names again.
My ideals have nothing to do with the fundamentals of American jurisprudence.

reply

You're going to have to point out where I'm calling you names here...

reply

Look at this pic and tell me which do you think it's the victim and who is the attacker??

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/ih2khd/kyle_rittenhouse_being_kicked_while_on_the_ground/

reply

You are attempting to taint the jury - that is illegal. You cannot claim to be pro-justice with you dedicate your life to disruption.

reply

You make no sense.

You are NO jury. Was asking for your opinion on the situation: of the 2 presented who looks to you like the aggressor???

And presenting photos and evidence is by no means "tainting the jury" - the jury NEEDS to be presented all the facts - pictures, videos.

Or do you want the jury to be "pro-justice" without evidence and decide the outcome purely emotional??? And of course, their decision have to match whatever you feel it's the right decision.

reply

You claim I make no sense, but you have to keep replying dishonestly anyway.

That is what makes no sense.

One frame of a picture does not tell the story, and yet that is what you are claiming, in an effort to taint people who do not hear the whole story as a jury would.

It's exactly as I say, and if I really make no sense you should not really need to keep saying it.

reply

Again, you're not a jury.

Even if I would present you the whole video, or all available videos, you would not accept them as evidence, because it will contradict your narrative and your propaganda.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iryQSpxSlrg

https://youtu.be/5C3usnMsY-o whole story, with pauses and everything. I know you will say "it's a conservative source" but it's enough to watch the videos- those are the facts, even if you don't agree with what the commentary ...

BTW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj59A487ryw

reply

How about this footage? The regular footage is old but the drone footage from the FBI is new. How can you watch this and say Kyle is not innocent of self defence?

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1455579165739167752?s=19

reply

I've already heard a lot of dishonest comments from supporters of this guy, so I am going to wait for more information.

reply

To me it looks like you are the dishonest one and when faced with footage that contradicts your feelings you call the poster "dishonest" ... although the poster does nothing but to present actual footage of the events.

But at least you seem to be open to "wait for more information".

reply

Thanks for your opinion.
Isn't what you are really doing here to reinforce the outrageously insistent statements made here that demand people find someone guilty before all the evidence is in?
I wonder if you can point me to ANY comment you have ever made that opposes one of the extreme right-wing shills or calls them dishonest here on MC though?

reply

I think I made fun several times of kukuxlu or what's his name for seeing woke shit everywhere he looks.

Does it count????

And yeah, I'm biased against left due to my personal history and I'm more scared of left extremism than of right wing extremism.

Plus: right wing extremism is wildly overrated in the USA. Left wing extremism is much more present and violent. It wasn't right wing extremism that burned down blocks of Minneapollis, it wasn't right wing extremists that created the CHOP in Seattle and shot few people, it wasn't right wing extremists that set on fire governmental buildings downtown Portland.

reply

> Does it count????

A little. It must have taken a tremendous effort. ;-)

reply

> I'm more scared of left extremism than of right wing extremism.

Why?

Can you give me your example of Left Extremism? I asked because since Trump and the constant fake-news meme almost any incidents in the media are being portrayed as being Left wing, including the Capitol Insurrection. If you are going to go there, I'm not interested.

reply

It's thermal drone footage from the fucking FBI...What extra information could you possibly be waiting for and what would it change? I get not liking Jack for whatever reason but your like/dislike of a particular person doesn't change the evidence they're putting on show. Are you waiting for it to be posted by CNN before you watch it? You think it's CGI? Come on man, this is sad. I'm giving you clear cut evidence and you're covering your eyes.

reply

Was talking last night with a leftist indoctrinated girl.

She was soooo cute when she asked me "Are you saying that women are weaker than men??? That's sexist!!!" and she didn't want to continue the discussion ...
And she was calling herself "a scientist", a "scientist" that denies ... science ...

Just like a lot of leftists deny any evidence that goes against their feelings.

reply

It's extremely worrying really. They've clearly been brainwashed.

You should have challenged her to an arm wrestle. If you don't mind me assuming your gender ha.

reply