Second time Chauvin has been massively wronged in an encounter with vile criminal scum. Glad the poor guy pulled through: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/derek-chauvin-convicted-george-floyd-death-survive-prison-attack-2023-11-26/
shareI have a suspicion that someone wants to take him off the board permanently.
It is no coincidence that this stabbing occurred just after the truth came to light and that his appeal was also rejected.
He's a political prisoner.
share^^^This
shareLOL. You must enjoy being manipulated by idiots.
shareNo. I never listened to any of the BLM grifters and I was disgusted by the Leftist politicians who allowed the mobs to run amok and loot and burn.
shareBut you listened to a fascist politician who orchestrated a halfhearted coup attempt and the fake news about stolen elections. You probably even believe that fat pussy Rittenhouse is a hero. Political prisoner .. how daft does one need to be to allow themselves to be brainwashed into stupidity. You probably also believe that trans shit and say things like cis men.
share
You probably also believe that trans shit and say things like cis men.
I think he means you believe the maga obsession with Trans boogeyman hype / persecution ,
rather than the commie lefty perspective of it .
Also " Leftist politicians who allowed the mobs to run amok" is not true you wont find a leftist mayor saying "oh yes , those riots were fine - we supported them"
compare that with king Trump who everyday insists he was cheated and is still president and who organised his own political coup attempt to take over the country.
Same kind of idiots, different team color.
shareIt is great news bc he shouldn't be allowed to escape justice.
shareIf it had been your wife, or mother, or sister that Floyd had pointed a gun at their pregnant belly, your statement may have been different..........unless you are one of those neutered soyboys.
shareIn America we (in theory) enforce the law equally, not just who Fox News tells you to hate. Chauvin is a turd with a history of being a problem. His dept dropped him in a hot minute because they didn't want this dirtbag wearing a badge.
shareAnd CNN and MSLSD, er I mean, MSNBC doesn't tell you who to dislike?? You sure about that??
shareThey would, if I watched them. They would lie to me every day, the way they lie about all the candidates because they want Dumpster Fire Don back to stand in front of the camera and spout incoherent idiocies, provoke riots, and lure sheeples to watch the news.
shareIf it had been your wife, or mother, or sister that Chauvin knelt on for two minutes after they could not a pulse, your statement may have been different..........unless you are one of those neutered soyboys.
shareIf your wife, sister, and mother are drug fiends, career criminals, and violent thugs that defy the police, than they deserve the consequences of their actions, including been knelt on by a LEO.
shareNo one deserves to be killed without due process when they are helpless on the ground and handcuffed.
Remember, Chauvin was told that Floyd did not have a pulse and he stayed on his back for another two minutes.
Stabbed 22 times and somehow managed to pull through. That's pretty badass, honestly.
shareMust be horrifying for him. Poor guy.
shareYeah, it’s definitely a nightmare scenario. Makes me think of that scene in Breaking Bad where the guy in prison gets stabbed about 837 times. Little did Chauvin know when he (probably) watched the show that he’d soon face a similar scenario.
shareThat pin-cushion prison sequence was brilliant!
shareI'm glad he lived to serve out his sentence.
shareNot really. It was probably just a little shiv. Had it been a knife, he obviously would have died. I don't like Chauvin, but he didn't deserve to be attacked. Our prison system is a barbaric free for all.
shareYou're not going to be able to fabricate an OJ Simpson caliber knife in prison! It was probably the equivalent of a butter knife!
share"Mr. Chauvin" ? 😄😄😄 Is that drug pushing and drug abusing piece of shit Floyd should be called Mr. Floyd, according to you?
shareI show the proper respect to people who risk their lives in order to protect the public from career criminal trash.
shareFloyd was a piece of shit but it wasn't up to Chauvin to execute him in the street. How was murdering Floyd protecting the public? All Chauvin had to do was get off of Floyd who was handcuffed and subdued then call for medical assistance. Then Floyd might be alive but Chauvin would not be in prison. Unfortunately for Chauvin he may not survive to see his parole date because he has a huge target on his back.
shareThat's what I had in mind. People over the world often dislikes cops in general, so when cop murders a person in the street (even a trash like Floyd), it smears cop image even more. I'm not defending either of them. A world is a better place with this pig in jail and Floyd in the ground.
shareRisk their lives? LOL. Cops kill more people than mass shootings and their job is safer than landscapers. Cops are one of the biggest drains on taxpayers because of all the lawsuits for wrongful death, wrongful shooting, destruction of property, theft, civil rights violations, and the scam war on drugs.
shareYou can’t actually believe any of what you just wrote, so it’s best not to even engage with it. Good luck to you.
shareWhy would you not believe some of it?
In the USA, the police kill over 1000 people a year since 2013.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1362796/number-people-killed-police-us/
Mass shootings kill more people in the USA than the police do. https://www.insider.com/number-of-mass-shootingsin-america-this-year-2022-5
Compared to some other occupations (including landscaping), policing is safer. https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-police-officers-die-in-the-line-of-duty/
Police misconduct has lead to $3.2 billion in settlements in the last ten years. This is a fraction of what the military costs us. https://thecrimereport.org/2022/03/09/police-misconduct-cost-taxpayers-over-3-2-billion-in-settlements/
Look at the FBI numbers for mass shootings, they are a fraction of the misreported numbers in the media that include anything and everything including drug deals. The real number for mass shooting deaths is way below 1000. On any given day of a mass shooting, the death toll is only about 0.25% of all deaths that day.
shareHow do you define a mass shooting? 1 or more shot? 4 or more shot? What number you using for mass shooting deaths?
My link said in part; "The Gun Violence Archive defines mass shootings as "four or more people shot and/or killed in a single incident, at the same general time/location not including the shooter." 647 mass shootings were listed for 2022, if only 2 people were killed in each, this is over 1200 deaths.
Counting only mass shooting deaths eliminate most deaths by gun violence as they are suicides and other incidents that result in a single person killed or wounded.
I define mass shooting the same as the FBI. The media includes anything willy nilly. Look at numbers from various organizations and media and you'll find wildly different numbers. Media has gradually redefined mass shooting to include almost any gun discharge in the presence of 1 or 2 other people but I doubt that's how most Americans would define it if asked. All those incidents don't make the news, but they are in the statistics. You even make the assumption it always includes a death, but that isn't how the media defines shooting. This leads to Americans (and citizens of other countries) being intentionally misled as to the number of mass shootings.
Americans have an unfounded belief that the news a timely reporting of current events and that there is inherent truthfulness to their broadcasts and published material but mass media is under no obligation to report news or be truthful. In fact, they lie to the public every day by omission, by using video that doesn't go with what they are reporting, by reporting events that didn't happen, by reporting events in such a way that viewers will infer the event is current and when it happened long ago, by misrepresenting events, by using clever camera angles, through creative editing, by using inflammatory language that isn't truthful, etc.
Are you going to show us the real data and the real truth? Your own word does not suffice as you are not some recognized expert on mass shootings and crime in the USA.
What do you have to support your claims?
LOL, that's rich coming from a person who posted whatever links were top of a google search. I gave you links and the information needed to educate yourself. You might have to put in effort at this point. Not every answer is a 30 second google search. This is a subject I've been studying for about 18 months and I have close relationships with people in law enforcement. If you don't want the info I gave you, I'm not losing sleep over it. Most people on forums believe whatever their preferred news channel + chosen political tribe tell them to believe and it's impossible to change their minds. I educate myself and speak what I know, not what red or blue tribe program me to say.
shareSo you don't have to post a link because "you know things" and we're just supposed to be stupid enough to trust you? Does that ever really work in an argument?
The links I post above were not from google. I rarely ever use google any more.
You're not providing enough links to support the claims you are making, in my opinion.
I have also been studying this for over a year and also have close relationships to those in law enforcement. This how easy of a claim that is to make?
How about you show off some of that education then?
Not everything can be dumbed down to a few links. I gave you credible links to back up the facts and directions on how to learn more but you seem more interested in arguing about nothing. People who care about the truth, find it. You don't care about the truth and just want to waste my time. It won't happen again. Strike 3.
shareI know this has nothing to with this thread but what bugs me a little is your user name. Quaalude is spelled with two As. Maybe I'm missing something here.
shareOhhhh, strike three!!! You're as threatening as Sheldon Cooper in the Big Bang Theory. Good luck with that.
Anyway, people who make claims and care about the truth post evidence to support their claims without being asked.
If you consider it a waste of time to support your arguments, then you are done here I suppose?
I don't have to "believe," they are facts, easily verifiable. But then maybe facts are not useful to a politibot.
shareCan you link to the facts you are using to come to your conclusions?
shareYou agreed with 3/4 of my "conclusions" (facts), the last one is a matter of whether you believe the people who make money from every shooting they report, and organizations who are aligned with gun grabbers, or the FBI tally that is far more restrictive about what is or isn't a mass shooting. So you want me to prove something to you that you already conceded and agreed with?
Info on labor deaths. You already agreed but asked for proof so I didn't put too much effort into convincing you.
https://www.bls.gov/charts/census-of-fatal-occupational-injuries/civilian-occupations-with-high-fatal-work-injury-rates.htm
https://www.princegeorgecountyva.gov/news_detail_T6_R1402.php
Police shootings are voluntary reporting and all organizations that record the numbers openly admit the numbers are way underreported. The ONLY reasonably accurate statistic is kept by the Washington Post. By their count the police average over 1100 FATAL shootings a year. But their reports are culled from news reports so are no doubt still underreported. I have to wonder if it includes people who die later from complications. It also doesn't include people who are run over, tased to death, pepper sprayed to death, choked to death, or killed in other ways directly or indirectly by police. This number is much higher than the FBI's count of fatalities in mass shootings. The reality is you are more likely to die from a police encounter than than in a mass shooting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
About the police being a drain on our tax dollars, you also agreed with me and there is considerable evidence but not collated and published and takes a lot of time to measure. Civil rights attorneys are great resources for this information as they are almost always directly involved. Chicago pays out tens of millions per year in wrongful dog shootings alone. One of the greatest drains is the militarization of police using the War on Drugs as an excuse.
Yes,if you make a claim that you learned about by reading something on the internet, then post a link. No one should ever have to ask.
shareI don't waste time on bot accounts. A person has to prove they can hold a conversation and then I will put in effort. You did so I posted the evidence you wanted. The other guy was never going to read those links. He ran away because his identity is tied up in his political beliefs, assuming he's a human and not a bot.
shareIt is chickensh*t to just call me a bot account instead of making a good argument.
shareBesides dog shootings and the scam war on drugs, you have destruction of property, violation of civil rights, wrongful shootings, wrongful deaths, theft, and the list go on. Youtube has many civil rights attorneys and you can get a sense of it there
https://www.themarshallproject.org/records/1712-police-settlements
Unfortunately, many settlements are never disclosed so a full accounting is impossible. But the police are a huge drain on taxes, outside their normal cost of operations.
Excellent news! He will live to be stabbed again...
shareToo bad Floyd didnt live to overdose a 3rd time.
shareNot a coincidence or random stabbing.
The stabber was a former FBI informant that told the FBI that he was plotting to k1ll Chauvin and then somehow ended up in the same part of the prison as Chauvin. All this after the truth came to light.
Another coordinated plot by your precious DS.
https://media.tenor.com/1D5S8Qcl668AAAAd/thumbs-up-conspiracy.gif
shareHow sad that you are too brainwashed to believe anything outside the MSM that is owned and controlled by the DS.
Who is John Turscak? Former FBI informant who stabbed Derek Chauvin 22 times comes under scrutiny onlineshare