[–] Corbell (3932) 23 minutes ago
And again, we see a lefty acting like, becuase the formatlities were observed that that doesn't make it a political witch hunt.
You went full retard. Never go full retard.
I love and own
Tropic Thunder on Blu-Ray. Here is an extended quote(s) from
Tropic Thunder:
Alpa Chino: As for why I'm in this movie, maybe I just knew I had to represent. Cause they had one good part in this movie for a Black man and they gave it to Crocodile Dundee.
Kirk Lazarus: Pump your brakes, kid. That man's a national treasure.
Alpa Chino: I just wanted to throw another shrimp on your Barbie.
Lazarus: That sh*t ain't funny.
Alpa Chino: I'm just f*cking with you, Kangaroo Jack. I'm sorry if a dingo ate yo baby.
Lazarus: You know that's a true story? Lady lost her kid. You about to cross a f*cking line.
Kevin Sandusky: Hey guys could we just cool it...
Alpa Chino: You know what, f*ck that, I'm sick of this koala-hunting ni**a-
Lazarus: For 400 years, that word has kept our people down.
Alpa Chino: ..what the f*ck!?
Lazarus: Took a whole lot of tryin, just to get up that hill, but now we up in the big leagues...
Alpa Chino: That's the theme songs from The Jeffersons.
Lazarus: Just cause it's a theme song doesn't mean it's not true.
Just because all of the I's have been dotted and the T's have been crossed in my summary of the process of
Jurisprudence (all formalities have been observed) does NOT mean that it causes or prevents a Politically based or biased result. It means that the LAW and Justice (are both blind) will be followed, understood, and the accused is guaranteed his/her day in court.
Just saying Political Witch hunt on TV doesn't make it so. Calling a government, a Banana Republic on a message board doesn't make it so, calling someone a political prisoner is nothing more than speech BUT doesn't make it so. 👍
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
Correct. It is the FACT that we all know, is that the "LAW" was NOT blind here, the "LAW" as enacted by the lefties in teh government, WITH FULL SIGHT, targetted Trump, not based on the needs of LAW or JUSTICE, but based on
POLITICAL MOTIVES AND INTENTIONS.
THAT is what makes it a witch hunt. My calling it that on a message board, is just my observing the facts your side's behavior, not causing it.
YOUR SIDE is the cause, I am just an observer of your bad behavior.
I do note that I have made this point many times already. So far your side's response seems to be to ignore what I say and just restate the same retarded shit you already said, as though something has cchanged in the last few minutes.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3937) a minute ago
Correct. It is the FACT that we all know, is that the "LAW" was NOT blind here, the "LAW" as enacted by the lefties in the government,
You're confused and what you are positing is an
"Opinion" and not even a learned, legal, or political opinion due to lacking veracity.
WITH FULL SIGHT, targeted Trump,
Hmmmm, again that sounds very much like your "Opinion".
not based on the needs of LAW or JUSTICE,
Wow look another unsubstantiated, biased, non-precedented "Opinion"
but based on POLITICAL MOTIVES AND INTENTIONS.
All of your statements, summaries, observations, and allegations have no witnesses under oath, sworn to obey the law, overseen by a tribunal, etc, etc, yada, yada, yada..
All you are doing is proselytizing in the Court-Of-Public-Opinion and losing.
THAT is what makes it a witch hunt. My calling it that on a message board, is just my observing the facts your side's behavior, not causing it.
Just examine WHAT you have just said. You are not a witness to any of the behaviors on this boards besides "Speech", "Debate", "Banter".
YOUR SIDE is the cause, I am just an observer of your bad behavior.
But would make an unreliable witness in a court of law because you lack "Conviction".
I do note that I have made this point many times already.
And that is admirable of you that you are in some ways willing to participate in an exchange of ideas.
So far your side's response seems to be to ignore
I haven't ignored a single thing you've stated to me. I tend to respond in quite a bit of detail also. I may even counter and offer some reliable references where appropriate.
what I say and just restate the same retarded shit you already said,
Is that your definition or understanding of the US system as "Retarded"?
as though something has changed in the last few minutes.
That sounds like you're stubborn and unwilling to accept information from others, NOT that the information provided to you is "Retarded".
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
We've been witnessing your sides insane and hysterical throwing of bullshit charges and investigations at him for years.
We saw it. That's a fact, jack.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3940) 2 minutes ago
We've been witnessing your sides insane and hysterical throwing of bullshit charges and investigations at him for years.
When you say
"WE" have you become the imaginary spokesperson for some group of people or individuals that might identify as the Political Crime Enterprise that tried to stop the Legitimate Transfer of Power?
Nothing
You've personally witnessed or observed justifies any acts that DJT is responsible for and will be held accountable for in a Court-Of-Law. DJT's defense against the charges presented by the citizens of
the United States of America and the laws he has broken won't be defined by BLM, ANTIFA, whatabout Hunter Biden, etc, etc, ad infinitum.
We saw it. That's a fact, jack.-
What you saw won't mean anything because
YOU'RE not being called to the witness stand AND DJT's guilt or innocence won't be determined by a presidential ballot.
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
When I say "we" I am identifying as a member and speaker for EVERYONE who paid ANY attention to the antics of your side, over the last 6 years.
And thus we can see that your side is out of control and utterly violating the equal protection clause.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3944) 4 minutes ago
When I say "we" I am identifying as a member and speaker for EVERYONE who paid ANY attention to the antics of your side, over the last 6 years.
The so-called Antics of one side do not make a justification for the actions of another side as you are trying to frame the Indictments and charges to one DJT.
And thus we can see that your side is out of control and utterly violating the equal protection clause.
Do you realize just WHAT you are Amendment dropping?
The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.
A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. As a whole, the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift in American constitutionalism, by applying substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War.
The meaning of the Equal Protection Clause has been the subject of much debate, and inspired the well-known phrase "Equal Justice Under Law". This clause was the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation. The clause has also been the basis for Obergefell v. Hodges which legalized same-sex marriages, along with many other decisions rejecting discrimination against, and bigotry towards, people belonging to various groups.
While the Equal Protection Clause itself applies only to state and local governments, the Supreme Court held in Bolling v. Sharpe (1954) that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment nonetheless requires equal protection under the laws of the federal government via reverse incorporation.
So go ahead Corbell. Make your case for/against the USA v DJT.
The internet is listening. 👍
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
Trump is not being treated equally. He is beign targetted by massive amounts of departments and resources.
Because of your side's hysterical political terror and hate of him.
I've stated this repeatedly now, up adn down this thread. So far all you lefites have just pretended to not see it and just talked stupid shit in response.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3945) 3 minutes ago
Trump is not being treated equally.
DJT is being treated equally and fairly because NO ONE is above the law. The Charges filed against DJT could have been filed against any USofA citizen and in fact several other people have also been indicted with the same or similar charges. Wouldn't that mean DJT is being as fairly treated as the others?
He is beign targeted by massive amounts of departments and resources.
The size of the departments and resources are not targeting DJT. The crimes that have been committed are the impetus that have caused the resources and departments used to investigate and litigate the case and or cases. Because DJT violated federal laws federal resources are being used. In Georgia state resources are being used because DJT violated state election laws.
You are correct here in that it isn't personal as in the E. jean Carroll case which was Civil.
Because of your side's hysterical political terror and hate of him.
There are indeed Hate crimes on the books, but DJT is not a subject nor a victim of a Hate Crime. DJT has said some racist and hateful remarks against certain groups but as far as I have seen none of those groups have targeted DJT with any hate beyond Free Speech. What acts of Political Terror beyond your subjective opinion should DJT's defense be using? Could you name a few?
I've stated this repeatedly now, up adn down this thread. So far all you lefites have just pretended to not see it and just talked stupid shit in response.
What is there to see? Back and forth between you and other posters? What does any of that have to do with the Speaking Indictment of DJT?
I still don't understand the Equal Protection Under the Law protection that DJT is being denied. You haven't explained just HOW this is happening and what his defense will be against the charges in the four indictments.
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
I have repeatedly explained it. You are just being willfully blind.
I understand. YOu know that this is about arresting your political opposition.
BUt you don't have the balls to be honest about it.
HInt. YOu might as well be honest. NOne of us over here, are going to give a FUCK about your bullshit excuses, if you put him in jail.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3948) 3 minutes ago
I have repeatedly explained it. You are just being willfully blind.
No, I haven't followed any of your posts. But I am willing to give you a fair shake and go back into your history, with your permission?
I understand. YOu know that this is about arresting your political opposition.
No, you don't understand that at all. DJT is not a Political Prisoner. He has been charged with crimes.
BUt you don't have the balls to be honest about it.
It doesn't take Cojones or bollocks to tell the truth. Which is how and why you get so much push-back against your "Opinions".
HInt. YOu might as well be honest. NOne of us over here, are going to give a FUCK about your bullshit excuses, if you put him in jail.
As a point of clarification please define by just where you mean "Here" is? I can't personally put DJT and his Co-Conspirators in jail. That is a function of the criminal justice system and a rule of law and no one goes to jail on "Excuses". 👍
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
Play
Stupid games, you win
Stupid prizes.
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
Your shit talk it noted and dismissed.
So, what's your plan for when this blows up in your face?
Most lefties I ask, implicitly admit that their plan is to pretend to be surprised and then whine like faggots.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3957) 11 minutes ago
Your shit talk it noted and dismissed.
I have no idea what that means. Please resend your last text message.
So, what's your plan for when this blows up in your face?
That hypothetical is almost a non-sequitur.
I don't personally need a plan. I have the ultimate nullifier to DJT should he reach the Presidential election as THE candidate. I participated in
Firing him once before and I can
Deny him this time. Fair enough?
Most lefties I ask, implicitly admit that their plan is to pretend to be surprised and then whine like faggots.
DJT lost and got swept brutally in 2020 and can't win in 2024.
reply
share
Corbell (11004)
2 years ago
Got it. Denial followed by whining like a faggot.
reply
share
NorrinRad (5470)
2 years ago
[–] Corbell (3963) 8 minutes ago
Got it. Denial followed by whining like a faggot.
Seems to me that is
EXACTLY what DJT did when he was soundly defeated by President Biden in 2020?
Denying, whining, scheming, plotting, lying, and
Crime-ing his way right into a very consequential series of indictments.
Got that?
DJT should have just accepted his defeat. But there was/is the problem of the stolen documents.
Wait, the activities of conspiracy to defraud the USoA began BEFORE the Transfer of Power.
reply
share