#BringTrumpBack
Is trending and is on fire on Twitter. Millions of people want Dementia Joe to step down and let Trump take over.
shareIs trending and is on fire on Twitter. Millions of people want Dementia Joe to step down and let Trump take over.
shareif Joe steps down or gets impeached then Kamala is POTUS.
you can't just "bring back" a former POTUS after Joe steps down or gets impeached. that not how it works.
he can be reinstated, because the election was fraudulent and stolen. it would be like he never lost.
sharethat not how it works too. he can't be reinstated back into office.
also he lost the election. it wasn't fraudulent and stolen.
Trump didnt lose, there has been no investigation into the election like there was in 2016, the dems have nothing to lose by investigating if they are right.
Biden himself said he would lose by chicanery and Hillary said not to accept the results of the election,
you cant complain of chicanery and then say there was none...
we both know for a fact that if Trump won there would be mass riots and Nancy would try to impeach him again and say he cheated and colluded.
Trump lost the 2020 election. get over it and move on.
shareonly a 2 year investigation would prove it, dems need to investigate the supposed chicanery.
sharecommon sense proves it .
If there was any evidence the media would jump on the biggest story ever.
Instead you Trumpites respond to that with:
"Well the commies own all the newspapers in the world and are covering it up"
"If there was any evidence the media would jump on the biggest story ever."
They completely ignored the Hunter Biden laptop story two weeks before the election.
And they ran the 'Russian Collusion' story for three years with no evidence at all.
You'd have to be a complete idiot to think they don't have an agenda. After 2016, all they talked about was how Trump had stolen the election. Now, if you even mention the possibility of anything wrong with the 2020 election, you're a conspiracy nut trying to undermine democracy.
yeah but the "Russion collusion" wether or not it happened was limited to some bots putting pro Trump posts / ads on social media.
It wasnt crazy allegations of stuffed ballotpapers and secret shenninagns in voting stations to alter the count.
"yeah but the "Russion collusion" wether or not it happened was limited to some bots putting pro Trump posts / ads on social media."
Nope. You don't get to change history.
The "Russian Collusion' that was alleged by the Press had Trump and his campaign actually colluding with the actual Russians. That was what they accused him of.
The bots on social media turned out to be what actually happened.
"It wasnt crazy allegations of stuffed ballotpapers and secret shenninagns in voting stations to alter the count."
No, it was crazy allegations that the U.S. president was colluding with a foreign government to undermine our election.
You're seriously trying to downplay the gravity of that?
No, it was crazy allegations that the U.S. president was colluding with a foreign government to undermine our election
yeah i agree thats big gravity , my point is "bots" were a realistic possiblity , so investigated.
The current "fixing the count" story made up by Trump is not a realistic possibility - it would require a plot of such huge complexity with so many people sworn to secracy and so many in positions of power colluding to supress evidence , that its just ridiculous.
Hence they are saying "when you find a shred of evidence bring it to court , we'll look at it "
And several court cases have been laughed out beause the evidence is as solid as a UFO spotter's photograhs
Trump was the only President in history to be investigated after an election, coincidence?
no fraud, cheating, colluding, stealing, chicanery was ever found. Trump won fair and square...
Thats true , and i believe the result . he got in fair and sqaure
Then followed a shitshow of trump moving his family into government , sacking the head of the fbi as just one example of covering his ass ,
throwing his weight around and massaging his ego,
generally fucking things up and embarrassing the USA world wide for four years
culminating in this completely absurd refusal to believe the election result and thinking he can change that reality by crying about it and threatening lawyers.
Brandon said he would lose by chicanery and Hillary said not to accept the results of the election. if this election was fair, then the democrats have nothing to lose by investigating it with a Mueller Report 2.0.
sharewe really need Trump back bro....
sharethat was only found out after a 2 year investigation. and why did Obama allow that? he also said that US elections are unhackable.
sharedid common sense not apply in 2016?
there was no evidence against Trump except hearsay from Nancy
biden said he would lose by chicanery and Hillary said not to accept the results of the election.
why no investigation? I thought Trump slowed the mail down, removed mail boxes, cheat, collude, steal the election? remember all these things biden and the liberal news repeated for over a year?
the dems have nothing to lose if they are right by investigating.
we both know for a fact that if Trump won, it would be mass anarchy right now and Nancy would have said Trump slowed the mail down, removed mail boxes, cheated, colluded, stole the election.
even all the major liberal cities boarded up their doors and windows cause they thought Trump was going to win.
how things have changed in only 4 years.
and its impossible for a certified dementia patient to get 13 million more votes than Obama.
the funny thing is that the next time a Rep wins the Presidency, you know the dems will complain and say they cheated.
hopefully we will both still be here in 2024 to find out...
and its impossible for a certified dementia patient to get 13 million more votes than Obama.
All the votes for Biden wernt for Biden specificly , they were for "not Trump"
common sense would say thats not right.
I guess there was no common sense in 2016, dems were just mad they lost fair and square.
no response to anything else?
couldnt really find any other solid points to respond to .
just a lot of bitching about 2016 and some speculation about what could've happened if trump won 2020 and 2024.
Like i said , there is zero evidence to suggest there needs to be an investigation.
There must be millions , MILLIONS , of Trumpers saying the voting stations were rigged , extra votes smugglined in , a commie conspiracy somehow set up executed and maintained in total secracy .
And not one of them can find any evidence?
if there was even a hint of wrongdoing perhaps there would be an "investigation"
But all we've got is Donalds ego saying "its a fix!" , and for some reason all his followers believeing it.
there was also no evidence that Trump cheated. but a 2 year investigation was started. and nothing was found.
wouldn't logic dictate that an investigation would be needed, because Joe said he would lose by chicanery and Hillary said not to accept the results of the election. you cant complain you will lose by cheating and then say there was no cheating when you win. you cant have it both ways.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/politics/igor-danchenko-arrested-steele-dossier.html
An analyst who was a key contributor to Democratic-funded opposition research into possible links between Donald J. Trump and Russia was arrested on Thursday and charged with lying to the F.B.I. about his sources.
Well said and great posting of facts. I see no one has nothing to say now. Where is ultra, keke and doogie?
shareThey gone bruh.
sharethanks bruh. yeah I pwns them all!
share🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Keep telling yourself that!
wut?
sharestill no investigation...
shareYou had ONE job!
sharebiden stole the election with mules.
sharehttps://media.tenor.com/r5krvFmp9QAAAAAM/smiling-viralhog.gif
shareyou mean the liberal media? lol
shareThat is your reply to me saying
"Instead you Trumpites respond to that with:
"Well the commies own all the newspapers in the world and are covering it up" "
Thanks for making my point!
Why is the non liberal media not bringing forth that evidence you mentioned?
they did already and were sued....
you are not allowed to say the 2020 election was stolen but you are allowed to say the 2016 election was stolen.
they did already and were sued.... ... um , yeah .. becasue not true
you are not allowed to say the 2020 election was stolen but you are allowed to say the 2016 election was stolen.
That's because the 2020 wasnt stolen and , again , NO ONE is saying 2016 was . then utube vids are just dems speculating , and they are just talking about russian facebook ads , which is different from rigged machines and all the maga fantasy stories.
how do you know the 2020 election wasnt stolen? has there been a Federal investigation that lasted 2 years? nope...
2016 Presidential Election
Joe Biden, 2019: “I absolutely” agree that Trump is an “illegitimate president.”
Hillary Clinton, 2019: The election was “stolen.”
Jimmy Carter, 2019: “Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and was put into office because the Russians interference on his behalf.”
Kamala Harris, 2019: “Absolutely right” that Trump “didn’t really win.”
Karine Jean-Pierre, 2016: It was a “stolen election.”
Jerry Nadler, 2017: It was a “tainted” and “illegitimate” election.
Bidney, Joe Bidney - Wrote bill with his own paw. Not a joke
https://youtu.be/FxLRrBsOAw0?t=5
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/6262b0d87e915c7bfa2aea36/Bidney-Joe-Bidney-Wrote-bill-with-his-own-paw-Not-a-joke
You can call me Bidney, Joe Bidney. And how do you write with a paw? lolz
This man is in serious decline on the biggest stage in the world in front of billions of people. It's pathetic, incomprehensible & unacceptable. Each time he appears & opens his mouth to speak, the democrats cringe & hope that he doesn't say something they can't "walk back" or deny that, it really is what he actually said. SMH
Actually we don’t know that, especially considering the very suspicious circumstances surrounding the 2020 election. It’s an objective fact that there was voter fraud in favor of Biden, whether it was enough to sway the election is what’s debatable.
shareTrump repeatedly bragged he could do anything as president. Turns out he did not want to investigate the election properly.
No one has ever been able to show evidence of widespread fraud that would pass muster in any court.
Even Fat Donnie doesn't truly believe there was any fraud involved.
sharehe didnt brag, he is confident. an investigation into the election has to be done by the House of Representatives, the President just cant say he wants a investigation, that would be abuse of power.
there is lots of evidence, Randall Graves posted a lot of info about it.
again, you dont need to show evidence in a Court, Nancy started her own investigation, she used the Steele dossier to start one, come to find out, it was all made up, but no one cares now.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/politics/igor-danchenko-arrested-steele-dossier.html
An analyst who was a key contributor to Democratic-funded opposition research into possible links between Donald J. Trump and Russia was arrested on Thursday and charged with lying to the F.B.I. about his sources.
He bragged. It was stupid to do so because the constitution clearly outlines what the president's powers are. The president's powers are not "anything Trump wants to do".
If Graves posted a lot of info about fraud, then why do the courts (including Trump appointed judges) think is is BS?
So evidence all by itself causes what to happen? Unless the court decides that there was criminal activity, then evidence by itself is meaningless.
there is nothing in the constitution about bragging, and the President cant do anything he wants, although the President can issue Executive orders. Brandon has issued about a 100 so far so he is doing "anything Brandon wants to do".
the majority of courts were democrat, but the republicans also didnt want to do anything, cause Trump messed up the status quo. the blowhards in DC like to keep things the same and dont like outsiders.
Trump proved that progress can be made, but like I said, the status quo must be kept in DC.
the House of Representatives can bypass the courts and start their own investigation as proved by Nancy, she used the fraudulent Steele Dossier as an excuse to investigate Trump.
you dont need evidence, you just need hearsay and speculation. the lie that Trump colluded was repeated so much that it became truth. this is how our democracy works now. its not who votes, its those who count the votes.
like I said in another post, the dems went on a media blitz saying Trump was going to cheat, collude and steal the election. he slowed down the mail and removed ballot boxes. every democrat/media repeated that they were going to lose by cheating. then Brandon won, then they said this was the most fair and honest election in history.
we now know that people can vote twice, you can request a mail in ballot and then vote in person. since it will never be investigated.
Arizona found at least 30,000 questionable votes. but no one did anything.
The only documented cases of people voting twice were all Fat Donnie's retards.
shareSTFU.....damn some people are extremely stupid...😂😂
shareYou people are as brainless as the fool you all worship. Your country is doomed one way or the other, LMAO.
sharePence certified the electoral vote. It is done, fraud or no fraud. Instead of making of BS claims, show us the law that says Trump can be "re-instated".
shareTrump was also certified as President, but Nancy said he cheated and colluded to steal the Presidency and then started a 2 year investigation. why not investigate this election just to make sure Brandon didnt also cheat and collude?
shareBecause Trump didn't want any investigation as president of either election. How is it you don't understand this?
sharewhy would he want to investigate himself? the President cant do that, its up to the House of Representatives to start an investigation. he asked if the 2020 could be investigated but Nancy said nyet. so we dont know if Brandon cheated or not because there is no investigation. there was no reason to investigate 2016. but the dems were mad that they lost so they started a fraudulent investigation based off a fraudulent lie.
shareLOL! Even Chris Christie knows that Fat Donnie lost.
shareDon't you remember that Trump was crying like a baby when he lost the popular vote? He was crying fraud all the time even though he had proof of nothing.
So was Trump lying when he claimed the constitution gave him the power to do anything he wanted?
I think making Kamala POTUS is the endgame.
share[deleted]
when thr rp take over the house they can name trump majority leader and the impeach Joe and harris. Trump is now president.
sharetrump 2021 1⁄3
shareEven Trump does not want it back. He's probably relieved. Keep dreaming though. I enjoy reading these pointless and dumb posts.
shareThis is probly true.
Now that he can brag that he was POTUS , he wont wanna go through the hassle again becasue it wont add anything to his bragging rights , which is all it was about for him.
“Let’s Go Brandon!”🤣 Fuck Joe Biden!
shareThere is a line of succession for when and if Biden does not make it the full four years. Trump is not part of that. Once Pence certified the election in January 2021, Trump was out and never to re-appear. Unless Trump wins another general election or manages to get selected as Speaker of the House (anyone can be chosen), then everyone above him in the line of succession resigns, he will not be president.
Everyone else knows this, why don't you?
if both biden and harris gits impeached then Speaker of the House becomes president.
shareIf Biden dies or is impeached/convicted, Harris immediately becomes president upon being sworn in. I can't see them both getting convicted in the same trial or on the same day.
One would assume Harris would be smart enough to select a new VP the same day and push to get them confirmed by Congress in the same way Ford became VP when Agnew quit.
Harris selection would have to be confirmed by a rep senate.
share