Eric Clapton Says He Won’t Play Venues That Require Proof of Vaccination
https://variety.com/2021/music/news/eric-clapton-refuses-venues-vaccination-1235024838/
shareAhhhh, FINALLY! A musician WITH BALLS! Thank you Eric!
share
MovieChat Forums > Eric Clapton Discussion > Eric Clapton Says He Won’t Play Venues T...
Here's an interview where he talks about what adverse side effects he had when he did decide to take the jab. Says he lost the use of his hands for about three weeks... that's pretty damn devastating for a guitar player!
https://youtu.be/4OHmMKrVbNk?t=767
EDIT: I rethought the thing about being devastating for a guitar player and it would be way more devastating as a person who has to do everyday things like wipe your ass!
There are still large groups of people (even on this website) who insists those death jabs are good, even while they provide you with ZERO benefits and run you the risk of everything from mild to permanent paralysis, anueryism, neurological degradation, onset dementia (if the ACE2 receptors spread the spike protein through the brain), myocarditis, liver failure, ovarian bleeding, seizures, heart failure, blood clots, and even nerve damage via Guillain-Barre syndrome.
And worse yet is that even if you do get the death jab you can still DIE from COVID-19:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/49-fully-vaccinated-new-jersey-residents-have-died-from-covid-19_3913918.html
Do you ever fact check the articles you read on these right wing websites? https://dailyvoice.com/new-jersey/essex/news/covid-19-vaccine-proves-99999-effective-in-new-jersey/813156/
shareLet me guess: The Truth(TM) can only be found on left wing websites...
shareExcept even Left-wing websites have said that the Pfizer jab is only 42% effective:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-just-143124782.html
So which is it? Is it 99.999999% effective or is it only 42% effective?
That's from Fox News . . .come on.
shareYahoo is Left-wing, and they decided to run with the print of the Mayo Clinic study (which is pro vaccine, by the way).
But here's one from another Lefty site, Axios... still saying the same thing:
https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-vaccines-pfizer-moderna-delta-biden-e9be4bb0-3d10-4f56-8054-5410be357070.html
So let me repeat the question: is it 99.999999% effective or 42% effective?
Honey no. Yahoo posts stories from other sources than their own and that one was from Fox News. I don’t want to hear something from a ‘lefties’ news source either. Let’s just stick to unbiased information.
shareHere is the literal medRxiv report submitted and published by the Mayo Clinic, where the research reveals that the Pfizer vaccine is only 42% effective:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v1.full.pdf
So now, let me repeat the question for the third time: is it 99.999999% effective or is it 42% effective?
so the pro vaccine sites are lying and in with Pfizer. or they are trustworthy now? pick your narrative clown
shareFollow the narrative. They only said the non-vaccines lost effectiveness so they could push an indefinite amount of booster shots.
However, there was never any legitimate data showing the vaccines were ever effective to begin with.
no there is no narrative to follow. there is science which you hate,
again more narrative pushing. hahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaahahah
"Do you ever fact check the articles you read on these right wing websites? https://dailyvoice.com/new-jersey/essex/news/covid-19-vaccine-proves-99999-effective-in-new-jersey/813156/";
That article was written by an idiot.
First of all, it's only counting deaths of vaccinated people. Wouldn't the effectiveness of the vaccine be measured by how many vaccinated people got Covid? Because only a certain percentage of people who get Covid die from it.
Secondly, there have been 637,000 U.S. Covid deaths since it began. That's in a population of 328 million people. So the chances of dying from Covid with no vaccine are around 0.194 percent. And that's over a year and a half's time. The numbers in this article are only from a few months - since the vaccine has been available. You need to extrapolate that out to get the real numbers. And the numbers only go to July 12th, over a month ago.
But of course, you just saw they headline and thought, a-ha! I'll prove those right-wing nuts wrong!
If you actually had good, factual information, I'd want to see it, I've yet to see anything that was not conspiracy free from your side of the argument.
shareWhy are you ignoring this, which was posted above:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v1.full.pdf
And why are you accusing others of not fact-checking articles when you're obviously not doing the same?
Where was that posted and what do you think it says that agrees with anti-vaccine right wingers?
share"Where was that posted "
Proof that you don't even bother to read the links that other people post.
It was source of the one you dismissed offhandedly as Fox News (even though it wasn't, and neither was its source document) as though that was all you needed to do to prove it wrong.
"and what do you think it says that agrees with anti-vaccine right wingers?"
Nice try at moving the goalposts. The document shows the research done that proves the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine has dropped to 42%, which is what the poster claimed the link said.
Which you ignored by just lying and calling it 'Fox News'.
And yet you have the arrogance to accuse others of not fact-checking their posted articles. While at the same time posting a bullshit article of your own that any third grader could tell was bad math.
First of all That link was not posted above, if it was mentioned in a Fox News story that doesn’t mean that it’s not still an opinion piece and yes that Yahoo link was to a Fox News story.
No that document does NOT prove that the effectiveness of the vaccine has dropped to 42% which proves that you didn’t read it.
There is even a Fox News logo above the story.
Wow. Your deceit has no limits. ALL of that is a lie.
"First of all That link was not posted above"
It was a link within the posted article. It was the source document for the story. It was a study that the article was based upon, not an opinion. If you would have actually read it, you would know that. Learn to fucking read with comprehension.
"yes that Yahoo link was to a Fox News story."
No, it wasn't.
"No that document does NOT prove that the effectiveness of the vaccine has dropped to 42% "
Are you fucking retarded?
From the study:
We defined cohorts of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals from Minnesota (n = 25,589 each) matched on age, sex, race, history of prior SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, and date of full vaccination. Both vaccines were highly effective during this study period against SARS-CoV-2 infection (mRNA-1273: 86%, 95%CI: 81-90.6%; BNT162b2: 76%, 95%CI: 69-81%) and COVID-19 associated hospitalization (mRNA-1273: 91.6%, 95% CI: 81-97%; BNT162b2: 85%, 95% CI: 73-93%). However, in July, the effectiveness against infection was considerably lower for mRNA-1273 (76%, 95% CI: 58-87%) with an even more pronounced reduction in effectiveness for BNT162b2 (42%, 95% CI: 13-62%).
share
Look I really wanted to have a conversation with you but you keep calling me a liar when I haven’t lied so BYE jerk.
Here is a fucking photo of the Fox News logo to the story: https://ibb.co/6HdrbmG
"Look I really wanted to have a conversation with you but you keep calling me a liar when I haven’t lied"
I've given you evidence you lied, and all you can do is run away.
"BYE jerk."
See?
You're a pathetic joke.
Look at the fucking photo dumb ass. https://ibb.co/6HdrbmG
shareOkay, the article is from Fox News. How does that change anything about this topic?
The link to the study was still in the article, so you're still lying about that.
And the study does say that the Pfizer vaccine's effectiveness dropped to 42%. So you're still lying about that.
So, 2 out of 3, (on the most germane points) you're still dishonest.
So he's endangering his own fans.
Hell of a way to pay them back for all the money they've put into his pockets.
Clapton thinks he actually has some left-wing cred , but his ideas are stupid and ill-informed. For a much better leftist hero who has the courage of his convictions, I suggest Roger Waters. I love that mutherfucker and it's not because he was in Pink Floyd but because his ethics and politics align themselves so closely with my own.
shareWow, how dramatic... His little arm hurt for 3 weeks. Poor baby.
share[deleted]
He was totally against this by personal experience just a week ago. If this doesn't share the shit out of you, then what will?
shareGood for him.
share