Tarantino says Baldwin is partially to blame for the womans death
share
He certainly is. He was the Director after all, and I would have thought that any actor would check a gun as soon as they're handed one before using it in any scene, even if the armourer has supposedly thoroughly checked it themselves. It's pure common sense isn't it.
Let's not forget Halyna Hutchins, RIP.
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/233286231/halyna_anatoliivna-hutchins
So , when the armorer hands you an AK47 , you'd empty all 30 bullets out of the magazine to check they are all blanks?
how long would that take?
Would you still do it if it was another actor handing you the gun mid scene?
Tarantino is right. People make the argument that on movie sets, the protocol is for the armorer or prop person to do all the checks, and for the actors to just take their word for it. But if that's the way it's done, they need to change. Basic firearms safety is that no matter who hands you a gun and tells you it's not loaded, or that it's loaded with blanks or dummies, you always check it yourself to be sure. To do so is not highly technical and does not require formal training. Anyone can learn to do it in half a minute or less. If the actor doesn't feel confident doing it himself, he could have the armorer open the action and remove the magazine in his view so he can see for himself. The bottom line is, never take anyone's word for it. Verify.
share
What they need to do is remove all firearms from TV and movie sets period.
You can make it a law that the actor is responsible for stunts including guns, but then you would have actors that would refuse to accept that liability (I wouldn't).
SFX are at the point where realistic gun fire/motion can be flown in post production.
I find it interesting that while the Hollywood left is so vehemently anti-2nd amendment, they make a fortune on movies which glorify violence and the use of firearms.
While I doubt Baldwin was to blame here, if I was handed a gun on a movie set, I would darn well check to see if it was loaded.I would never take anyone else’s word for it.
As would I, being a CCP holder in my state it would be my normal reaction to do so. My wife however doesn't much like guns and she never sees mine ever. If she was an actress on a movie set and they handed her a prop gun and told her it was safe, she would not have a clue how to open it and determine if the rounds inside the gun were blanks or live.
I did not mean to imply that I actually know anything about guns! I should have said that I would want a visual confirmation right in front of me from the person in charge of handling weapons.
My brother -in -law has lots of guns. He is a hunter. And like your wife, I have never seen his guns except for one time.
He was showing a handgun to a friend. Of course it was not loaded. I asked to see it. I was curious. He gave me five seconds and took it away from me. No one even trusts me with an unloaded firearm!
'No one even trusts me with an unloaded firearm!'
😆
fun fact:
when you pop open a revolver to check,
"loaded with blanks" looks exactly the same as "loaded with bullets"
https://detroitammoco.com/images/blog/Blank-vs-Live-Round.jpeg
Some blanks have a pinched-looking tip. But yes, you can tell the difference.
no prop gun woman is
share[deleted]
When you point a gun at someone and pull the trigger, yeah, that would mean you have some responsibility in what happened.
shareThis is similar to the guy who killed Brandon Lee. He was trained not to aim the prop gun directly at another actor and shoot, but rather aim slightly to either side (or above) of the performer. And what did he do? Aimed right at him and shot. Retard.
shareYeah , yet weirdly no-one knows his name and the film is remembered for film , not the accident.