MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > when will feminism cancel all cheerleadi...

when will feminism cancel all cheerleading?


doesn't sexy cheerleading set feminism back to the stone age with every shake of their booty?
scantily clad, "supporting the men", it's not empowering, it's DEpowering and sterotying women back to sex objects.

cheerleading ought to be cancelled and removed for all of women's progressive sakes.

Every time it happens, it resets the feminism growth back to square one.

Feminist unite! Stop the cheerleading, stop all makeup, wear pants, stop showing skin! Get all your shits together. Make it happen. Get it right.

reply

Don’t give the puritans any ideas.

reply

Don't you know that most feminazis are hypocrites? They want to be sexy and have fun, but then get mad if the men look at them longer than 5 seconds. They treat men like shit, and then can't understand why they can't get laid later. They are their own worst enemies.

reply

Exactly this. All of this

reply


Amen!

🤨

reply

THIS GUY SEEMS TO KNOW HIS STUFF.☝🏾🫤

reply

It never will. As a guy I do find cheerleading to be sexy/cute but it’s much more than that. A lot of those girls are serious athletes, very strong and agile. It would be really unfair to disallow young women a sport that many of them enjoy and excel at.

Feminism isn’t a scourge, it’s a reasonable attitude in a lot of cases.
Pushy, angry anti-male feminism seems largely a product of urban myth, movie stereotypes or a few random women that would be world class bitches under any circumstances. Most women are just not like that.

reply

My wife was a cheerleader and because she was just under 5’ (59.5 inches / 151cm), she had to stand at the front. She’s still got all the moves, lol.

reply

Lucky boy😄

reply

Just dance moves 😭

reply

TOP OF THE PYRAMID!...LUCKY MAN.

reply

It’s good to be the king.

reply

It's not myth at all. I personally know women and younger girls who are eating that stuff up. I've even seen the impacts from barbie.

What I notice with all my long years in life, is that when their biological clock starts that count down, their tune changes based on their outcomes need. All the protests take a back seat. Because that is reality and it's been going on for thousands of years, successfully, and it always will.

Some women here will read that as misogynist, but it really is not. I don't mean anything hateful about that fact, it simply is a fact of life. Just pointing it out is not hateful. It's simply reality facts.
Id prefer women simply admit it to themselves quicker, and not waste their time being toxic.

reply

You know some crazy women man. Even the serious, short haired, flannel wearing lesbians I knew back in school were generally pretty chill.

I have a wife, a daughter, a sister and a mother, I want them all to have equal opportunities and protection. I think we’ve made great strides and we’re pretty much there. Don’t let a few obvious loonies define a vital movement✌️

reply

That's the whole thing.... they are not loonies to them selves, they are right and justified: true the patriarchy built everything around the patriarchy, therefore, everything based around that is bad, and men are macho and toxic, men repress everyone.... yeah there are cases of that, but these days, they really think it can be fixed by replacing all men with women. But they'd still be using the entire system designed and kept up by men.
Opportunity IS here, but it will never equalize until all jobs have even numbers: more women mechanics, more men secretaries.. the but sexes simply aren't interested in that. So it will never equalize. But the option of choice IS there.

reply

Don’t get worked up over it, most people can spot a trouble maker and avoid any nonsense.

Just my opinion and entirely anecdotal but by a very wide margin most people seem decent and have similar, reasonable goals.

Anyway, there are always a few nutters in any movement, best to ignore those sorts.

reply

I THINK YOU FOUND ONE.🤫

reply


Well said, Shogie!

😎

reply

👍

reply


I'd say this belongs in politics. But actually I think it more likely belongs in 1973.

reply

give me an ....A

reply

Well it's making for a good discussion. :)

reply

🤣

reply

I had a girlfriend in high school for awhile who was a cheerleader for a rival school. That made for some interesting and challenging situations at times.

In my late 20s, I worked at a huge sports complex for a major university. The cheerleading squad was equally composed of both males and females. They used to practice their routines in the gymnastics room directly across from my break room. I had to routinely unlock it and grant them access to it. I can't deny that those nubile bodies were often a distraction in my job.

reply

You're going to have to elaborate on this whole "interesting and challenging situations" involving rival cheerleaders thing, man. We need more details... you know, in order to understand.

reply

Well, one example involved a hosting Friday night football game with said rival school where she was especially vocal in cheering for a player from her team that happened to have the same first name as mine. I was a bit conflicted, unsure if I should have felt jealous or honored. 😁

reply


Okay sourpuss.

🤨

reply

You know how you solve this?? Turn the channel or turn off the TV and read a book

reply

...

nobody understands irony or sarcasm anymore. world of fucking idiots

reply

I can't believe anybody thought your OP was serious 😂 Or maybe I'm wrong, and it was!

reply

No you are correct. It really wasn't serious. But designed to expose that hypocrisy, and promote discussion.

reply

My two cousins are cheerleaders. One is a boy, one is a girl. They are both children, and still are. (Well, teenagers.) I don't think he cheerleads anymore, but she still does. He did it for years. My grandma cheerleaded when she was really young in high school.

reply