MovieChat Forums > Politics > Put election interference news here

All respected news organisations there/SSSSSS

reply

And you think that CNN/MSNBC/CBS/ABC/NBC/Yahoo are respected news organisations?🤣🤣🤣

reply

Which respected news organisations would you recommend?

reply

Brace yourself folks for another pointless round of "All your news sources are false fake shills , the real truth is out there but I wont tell you where" from TVfan

reply

That's why I am asking for his recommended sources. I mean they must be quality, right? Not just, say, a social media site where anyone can say anything?

reply

But Muh Fact Checker says that we have the most secure and safest elections.

reply

Although there are always some cases of election fraud and interference etc at a local level, the salient cases here - for that 'steal' which Defendant 'find me some votes' Donald has always alleged of the last election - have consistently failed in court, being held as without merit. In over 60 cases to be accurate, across a range of judges and jurisdictions. Those who claim that there has really been a greater number, and with some success, on this board oddly never seem to provide a source. The impression now is, by raising or implying this conspiracy again, Reps are building themselves up to a fail on Nov 5.

reply

Commies protecting other commies doesn't mean shit didn't happen. You guys spend wayyyy too much time defending election shenanigans...almost like "the lady doth protest too much, me thinks".

Tom Brady always knew it was a fumble, but he benefitted...so why acknowledge it?

reply

You have been unable to demonstrate that "shit happened" at any scale.

And what makes the Democrats communists?

reply

Jabbering apes gonna jabber, I guess. You'll not get any coherent response from this silly simian.

reply

Those judges refused to accept the evidence because they didn't have the cojones to overturn a fraudulent election.

That's why they never did an official investigation.

reply

Trump hired two independent groups to look for 2020 voter fraud and found zilch
Didn’t he tell you? 😂🤣
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3977965-second-trump-hired-firm-found-2020-fraud-claims-were-all-false/amp/

reply

The owners of both firms were establishment shills and those were not official investigations.

reply

He paid them 1,000,000 bucks you nincompoop!!🤣
Remember, Trump only “hires the best people” 🤣😂

reply

That money doesn't make any difference when the establishment can control every aspect of it.

Also, Dominion would have sued both firms for at least ten times as much or until they filed for bankruptcy.

reply

😂You never give up!
Whatya gonna do when Trump loses?

reply

Any particular evidence that they were "establishment shills"?

reply

SOURCE!?

reply

You want me to "give it up", or suggest I "give it up" yet you're still devoting your energy to following me around on here and making snide comments or stupid remarks.

reply

Evidence please…

reply

I really don't at all get what you get out of this. Does seeing me reply to you with genuine confusion at your behaviour really give you so much of a dopamine fix?

reply

Source or didn’t happen

reply

tvfan hasn't offered any as is usually the case, and there is no good asking, sorry about that.

reply

Ah, Flimflam, always ready to leap in and protect the Head Sister ✊🏻

Tell me, is it true that you take it deep in both ends from the other Sisters? If so, reply to this post with:

Who are you to ask this?

Go…

reply

Who are you to ask this?

reply

I'm with you melton , sources and facts and shit are yesterdays news.
Who needs and facts when we have Trump ?
He can just make stuff real , like if he dosent like the elction result he can declare it rigged , and thats good enough for us right ?


If those newspapers say something bad about Trump we can just get TVFan to call them "establishment shills" problem solved!

I can see why you are backing TVfan's strategy of "no facts or sources" so vehemently
It just workd so well right ?

without the need for any truth or anything we be can be right everytime!


reply

WTF are you talking about? You're not remotely ‘with me’ you freak.

reply

Its called sarcasm.

reply

It’s called being a fucking helmet.

But it’s adorable to see you swooping the rescue of your fellow Sister 🤎

reply

See, I knew you'd soon get the hang of it...

reply

OK 🤷🏻‍♂️ So is it true that within The Sisters community you’re referred to as ‘The Hole’?

If so, reply to this post with:

Oh dear…

Go…

reply

What a shame...

reply

View with skepticism the articles from the Gateway Pundit. They spread lies about the Georgia election workers and they are being sued by a Dominion employee.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/10/gateway-pundit-defamation-lawsuit-election-workers

https://missouriindependent.com/2024/06/28/st-louis-based-gateway-pundit-accused-of-using-bankruptcy-to-derail-defamation-suits/

reply

She was caught on video; picture and audio is self explanatory.

They have to side with her, otherwise they would be admitting that the election was rigged and it would make them complicit.

reply

Go away troll! Post your specious video evidence or go back to your cave!

I'm certain that she would have lost her defamation case if there were videos showing her committing crimes. There were two Georgia ladies who sued Giuliani for defamation and they won $148 million.

https://apnews.com/article/rudy-giuliani-georgia-election-workers-defamation-case-cde7186493b3a1bd9ab89bc65f0f5b06

reply

Oh that's right, you only listen to establishment sources since they tell you what you prefer to hear.

If they don't side with her they would be admitting that there was election fraud.

reply

The first thing to do was observe. I have no idea what gatewaypundit is...but I do know I will never visit the site.

reply

Observe! gather actual data ?
Waddya nuts?
The best way to prove them commie dems rigged it again is to just pull that fact out of your ass weeks or months before the event has even happened. - like DJT did last time

reply

What?

reply

I'm agreeing with you.

reply

Joe Biden, 2019: “I absolutely” agree that Trump is an “illegitimate president.”
Hillary Clinton, 2019: The election was “stolen.”
Jimmy Carter, 2019: “Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and was put into office because the Russians interference on his behalf.”
Kamala Harris, 2019: “Absolutely right” that Trump “didn’t really win.”
Karine Jean-Pierre, 2016: It was a “stolen election.”
Jerry Nadler, 2017: It was a “tainted” and “illegitimate” election.
Nancy Pelosi: The 2016 election was hijacked.

reply

Then we have arrived at why you're an ignoramus.

reply

https://x.com/JamesBlairUSA/status/1851297158307463372

reply

Deceptive election practices and voter intimidation. I think it falls under the Fraudulent Misrepresentation Doctrine.

Democrats hate to relinquish authority and control.

reply

Indeed. The many hijinks they're pulling though, and the refusal of the leftist minions to recognize tells us a lot- their purpose is to destroy the US, and not just the leaders. It's all of them. They have no honesty, no common sense, no ability to see how these things will turn on them, no ability or intention to learn the faults of their ways. Specific individuals are paid to lead the lemmings on sites like this (I'm sure you know who those people are here), and those mindless vermin are only too happy to oblige. Evidence and proof used to hold water with the public, but when half the population finds no value in truth, honesty, logic, reason and fact then they are unworthy of our time and efforts and an outright danger to those that would make sense and are moved by those virtues. The idea of being 'right' (in the sense of being 'correct') is far more important than gleaning any knowledge or wisdom, and it comes down to ego. These people are enemies even to themselves, and their self-centered nature means they are no good to anyone else either. The people that impress me are the ones that can, in the midst of conversation, learn new facts and immediately incorporate them into their thought processes- this displays a remarkable dearth of ego. It comes down to this: does one care more about appearing correct or being correct?

reply