Ex-Democrat Tulsi Gabbard officially endorses Trump - Politics Discussion

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

She appeared alongside Trump to commemorate US service personnel killed in an attack in Afghanistan three years prior, using it as an opportunity to criticise the Biden administration.
Thirteen US service members and more than 100 Afghans were killed during the suicide bombing at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul.
The incident occurred as American troops made a chaotic withdrawal from the country, and the Taliban returned to power.
Trump labelled it a "humiliation" that "set off the collapse of American credibility and respect all around the world".

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17837) 6 months ago

Where were the President and VP??

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

they were in their bunker basement plotting the next war(s) and how to steal the next election.

2 new wars - check
steal 2024 election - TBD

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17837) 6 months ago

That wouldn't happen to be Iran, would it?

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

I wouldnt be surprised at all or get stuck in a ground war with Russia for the next 20 years.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17837) 6 months ago

MAGA Justice League has now acquired...

Wonder Woman.

reply

[–] maixiu (2865) 6 months ago

I guess she doesn't enjoy being put on a watchlist - popular with a certain poster here - for her political views.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3567) 6 months ago

Was this a reference to me? I’ve been following that story very closely
And opened a thread on it. No one seems to be taking it too seriously but putting a former Congresswoman and current U.S. Army LTC on a terrorist watch list because she took political positions adverse to Hillary and Biden is unconscionable

reply

[–] maixiu (2865) 6 months ago

No, Skavau is the one who pines for having people put on watch lists if they dissent from the established political and social morality of our rulers.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

You ever stop lying, ever?

I've said that all governments maintain watchlists for people who they believe to be a potential security risk. You implied that any government that does this is fascist. By your logic this makes almost every country on earth fascist.

You still have not acknowledged that you have to think this if you claim watchlists are fascist.

reply

[–] curiousMInd101 (4648) 6 months ago

The snitch bitch loves when people he disagrees with are put on watchlists.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (4536) 6 months ago

Everyone seems to be coming around to endorsing Trump.

Hell, even that Vlad Putin user just messaged me on a different board and said he was wrong about everything and I was right about most things "by that he probably means all things". He then said he is maga and loves trump, he thinks the dems ran an awful candidate and then replaced him with a worse one. It's a shame he didnt come around before he got banned.

reply

[–] Keelai (36162) 6 months ago

No surprise!

Tulsi is close to Putin and Mike Flynn. Putin wined and dined the both of them in Russia. Putin also paid Flynn $45,000 for coming.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/guess-who-came-dinner-flynn-putin-n742696

Putin wants Trump to win so he can continue his European invasion in which Trump told him he can do.

Trumpites = Useful idiots of Putin

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

here is Putin and Obummer agreeing to let Russia invade Crimea and Ukraine.

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/MSNBC/Components/Video/__NEW/f_obama_putin_150928.jpg

in this meeting, Joe said it was ok for Putin to invade Ukraine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/B912o_WeeBlomrvEPLf96jCcGUg=/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost/public/4PCQBZGOTQI6XIREXVM32IQZPQ.jpg

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

That agreement was made long before Trump’s first Administration.

Keelai’s Masters invade Ukraine and she still blames Trump.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

yup, my guess is that Hillary was supposed to win, then they would have given Putin a greenlight to invade Ukraine so they could launder money under the guise of war. and covid never would have happened too.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Why would Putin accept a deal in which his own military becames stuck in a quagmire in Ukraine for several years? What the fuck is in it for them?

And why would COVID not have happened if Clinton won?

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

fertile farm land.

covid was used to get Trump out of office. as Nancy said, "one way or another Trump will be leaving."

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>fertile farm land.

That they don't have access to because they're stuck fighting in Ukraine. And why would the USA want Russia to get fertile farmland?

>covid was used to get Trump out of office. as Nancy said, "one way or another Trump will be leaving."

Provide evidence that COVID was used to get Trump out office, and provide evidence that the USA government somehow caused COVID to happen.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

for farming....

www.google.com

duckduckgo.com

the burden of proof is on you.

evidence please.

thats fake, please provide real evidence.

what does covid have to do with the pseudo dynamics of illnesses and the prevention of disease in corporate america?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

So again, as usual you're back to behaving like a petulant little child because you are too stupid to back up any of your claims.

It's genuinely pathetic that I assume a grown adult you behaves like this.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

I am still amazed that you keep trying to troll me. I gotta give you credit though for trying.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

I am not trying to troll you, or anyone.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

going to need evidence for this.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Back to behaving like a pathetic little child again. From a grown adult.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

this is what happens when you ask for evidence. most normal people dont do this and can have a normal conversation with someone on the web.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Most people don't make dumbass claims that require evidence like yourself.

What am I supposed to say when you claim "Obama had a secret deal with Putin?" What is there to say other than to ask how the fuck you claim to know this?

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

why would I know this? I am just a regular joe in a normal state in a normal city. like Harrisburg, PA. thats normal right? Harrisburg?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

You don't know it. That's my point. You just made shit up.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

I know. I make stuff up just when I respond to you.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

I've seen you make shit up beyond just talking to me.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

not all the time. sometimes my sarcasm doesnt translate well on the interwebs.

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Bitch constantly demands evidence. You ask him for some and he starts crying. Incredible.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

yeah, he doesnt like it when he gets beat at his own game.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

You are a moron. I didn't seriously claim that Trump made a deal with Putin. I was simply throwing JoWilli's logic back in their face. They made the claim that Obama made a deal with Putin, and refused to provide any evidence for it. By this logic one could just say the same about Trump.

There's no difference.

You are genuinely thick.

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Yeah whatever you fucking hypocrite. Are you done crying?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

What's the hypocrisy here? It doesn't seem like you actually understand my argument.

If it's wrong for someone to claim that Trump made a deal with Putin without evidence, then it's equally wrong for someone to claim Obama made a deal with Putin without evidence.

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Done crying now?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Replying to you with my actual argument that you clearly do not understand is not "crying".

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Baby done crying now?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

"huhu u mad bro"

Genuinely childish behaviour

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

You done rage-dumping?

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Well handled, Jo

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

JoWillis way of "handling" me is to just behave like a pathetic little kid.

I note the continued stalking though as you go back through my profile.

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Cool story 👍🏻

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

thanks, when I troll skivvy he gets mad. I guess he is the only allowed to troll.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

I don't troll full stop.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3284) 6 months ago

Full stop, can't stop, won't stop.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Zero evidence whatsoever for your claims, as per usual

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

What year was the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation (Russo-Ukrainian War)?

What year did president Trump start his first Administration?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>What year was the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation (Russo-Ukrainian War)?

2014. Relevance?

>What year did president Trump start his first Administration?

2017. So?

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

Did you bother to read my previous post that you replied to?

Here it is again with your answers:

"That agreement was made long before Trump’s first Administration. = 2014 vs 2017

Keelai’s Masters invade Ukraine and she still blames Trump."

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>"That agreement was made long before Trump’s first Administration. = 2014 vs 2017

You have provided no evidence that any such agreement ever existed.

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

They got that agreement and permission from the Obama/Biden Administration.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

No evidence that any such "agreement" or "permission" existed. Provide evidence for your claim.

You are again talking fucking bullshit

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

From who, the same establishment that lies and denies it since they are profiting from the money laundering of that war?

You’re an idiot if you think they will admit to their treason and corruption.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>From who, the same establishment that lies and denies it since they are profiting from the money laundering of that war?

So you admit you have zero fucking evidence but are just assuming that some agreement exists because you distrust the political establishment? The logic here doesn't even make sense. Why would the USA approve or, and endorse Russia annexing Crimea in 2014?

Why the fuck should I take you seriously on anything?

reply

[–] tvfan (14561) 6 months ago

Why the fuck should I take you seriously on anything?

You shouldn’t. You should think for yourself, apply deduction, discernment and connect the dots instead of believing the establishment lies and deceptions.

Why do you blindly trust, believe and rely in the establishment?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>You shouldn’t. You should think for yourself, apply deduction, discernment and connect the dots instead of believing the establishment lies and deceptions.

And again: What dots are we supposed to be connecting here? Your logic makes no sense. Why would the USA approve or endorse Russia annexing Crimea in 2014?

>Why do you blindly trust, believe and rely in the establishment?

What establishment line am I even supposedly trusting here, exactly?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

He said no such thing, and neither did Obama. You are just outright lying.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

please provide evidence he said no such thing.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

Are you back to not understanding the burden of proof again? You made a positive claim.

Perhaps I can say that Trump made secret deals to allow Putin to annex Ukraine if he wins. Is it incumbent on you to disprove that if I did?

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

please provide evidence that Trump made secret deals to allow Putin to annex Ukraine if he wins.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

I didn't seriously claim he did. The point is by your logic, you're claiming the same thing regarding Obama.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

"Trump made secret deals to allow Putin to annex Ukraine if he wins."

your words, going to need evidence of this.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

By your logic I need no evidence, by your logic the onus is on you to disprove me.

That's the logic you use for claiming Obama had a secret deal with Putin. Why is it any different if I claim Trump has a secret deal with Putin? I am throwing your arguments back in your face.

reply

[–] JoWilli (21649) 6 months ago

why would Trump have a secret deal with Putin? its not like they are best friends.

the burden of proof is on you.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

>why would Trump have a secret deal with Putin? its not like they are best friends.

And is it your contention that Obama is somehow best friends with Putin?

>the burden of proof is on you.

I'm not actually claiming that Trump made some deal with Putin. I'm throwing your argument that Obama made a deal with Putin back in your face. You can't provide any evidence that he did but you insist people somehow disprove your claim that he did.

If you can claim that Obama had some secret deal with Putin, and refuse to provide any evidence for this - then people can by your logic, by your logic (for emphasis) claim the same thing about Trump and Putin.

In other words, you are a hypocritical piece of shit.

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

Busted!

Skavau fails again 🤦🏻‍♂️

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) 6 months ago

And how did I fail? It's like you didn't remotely understand the point I was making.

If its acceptable for JoWilli to just make shit up about Obama, then why can't I do the same for Trump?

reply

[–] Melton (5618) 6 months ago

🍆

reply

[–] Keelai (36162) 6 months ago

Your Tulsi is a Commie moll. Stop defending her treachery!

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 months ago

Who did Tulsi betray? It sure as hell wasnt the American people.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 months ago

I see you received no rebuttal from K. Not at all surprised.

reply

[–] SamNoyoun (6016) 6 months ago

Donald Trump admitted he had no idea he would be taking part in a Wisconsin town hall event with Tulsi Gabbard as he stood on stage with the former Democrat.

The former president told the crowd in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, that he actually thought he would be delivering a prepared campaign speech for his supporters on Thursday night.

No, there's no sign of mental decline, he's as lucid as ever!

ETA: And what did he talk about you might ask...

Donald Trump has wildly claimed that “107 percent” of new jobs have been taken by illegal immigrants.

Trump made the baseless claim at a town hall event on Thursday night in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, after a woman in the crowd told him she was worried about illegal immigrants “taking away opportunities from Americans”.

The Republican presidential nominee responded: “It’s going to start with the Black population. African Americans are losing their jobs. And I don’t know if you heard the latest statistic, that of the jobs that these people created, which is very little, every single job was taken – about 107 percent – was taken by illegal immigrants.

“There’s been no job creation by them, the jobs were filled by illegal immigrants.”

His statistic – which does not make mathematical sense and was not backed up by any evidence – prompted the crowd to boo and jeer at the made-up figure and he was not scrutinized further by town hall host Tulsi Gabbard.

reply