MovieChat Forums > Politics > "Liberals" currently tell you you're par...

"Liberals" currently tell you you're paranoid if you talk about Europe being taken over by ISISlam


How long until they switch to saying "you just have to deal with it" instead?

Cause in Brit-tard land, the new left-wing "Labour" Prime Minister announcing he's making a special police unit to deal with street protests against ISISlamic immigration.



So.. . tell me this, if the number one crime in a country is being against ISISlam... then how is that anything other than Sharia law?


You twisted suburban basement freaks who wrongly call yourselves "liberal" despite the fact you don't care about liberty - you guys are going to change your "approach" soon aren't you, will it be within the next 6 months maybe?

When is that coming?

reply

Liberals adore islam, their mentality is "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"

Islam is the antichrist, the bible says that the whole world will wonder after the beast, islam has sucjh a supernatural pull of people, it can make gay people beg for more islamic immigration, the same islam that throws gays from buildings.

satanic

reply

They're so retarded. Islam is the least "liberal" thing ever. They think they can keep fawning over this horrible religion and nothing bad will ever happen, like... everything will still carry on the same for them, it won't.

reply

i'd say that some liberals are using islam as a tool to create chaos. then they'll demand more power to pretend to control the chaos.

reply

But you can't control people who have 5 times more kids than everyone else.

Not in the long term! They never think about anything except the next 5 minutes.

reply

the left is using a gramsci theory of chaos, i mean everything is a problem now right? everythings racist, everythings homophobic, transphobic, the world is going to end tomorrow because of climate change, they've given us an economic model that doesn't work and just made us poor, inflation, higher prices.

then they've flooded our countries with the most evil people ever. some of the problems the left have created are very real, others are fake like climate change..

i don't know what their exact end game is, because i agree, by importing islam they are creating their own enemy. but are they?

it seems were heading for a great reset, where the world gets to something so extreme, so much chaos that people demand more socialism and even comunism as a means of "security"

the muslims are clearly a tool in all this, they bring chaos, but do the left have a plan for all this? i dunno, maybe they think muslims will be easy to control.

reply

"They're so retarded."

More words of wisdom from mexicanbutthurt.

reply

Why do you support bigoted lynch mobs running amok in society?

reply

Why do you keep asking me stupid asinine questions (that you dont care about the answers to)

, instead of answering mine?

reply

I read that your lynch mobs were rioting in the streets causing damage. You're the one condoning it. Why?

reply

So anyway, how long until you start saying "deal with it"

Is your refusal to answer it the same as saying " deal with it"...?

reply

Why do you insist people should supinely submit to an invasion of their homelands? If some vagrant walked into your house and began availing himself of your food and clothing, you'd be calling the cops while huddling behind your couch.

reply

I'd like your help in defending the Palestinians right to their homeland from Eastern European settler-colonizers who should be forced to return back to their original countries instead of ethnic-cleansing. Meet me here:
https://moviechat.org/tt12752438/Paris-2024-XXXIII-Olympic-Summer-Games/66a7cd649c248f7db33f699c/why-is-China-and-America-not-banned-from-the-Olympics?reply=66afae3540781a6044d8754c

reply

Except they're Jews, not Eastern Europeans. While I have sympathy for the Palestinians, the Jews are in their homeland too. Let the two tribes battle it out without any involvement from the West, particularly the GAE.

reply

No, they're not. Early Judaism practiced proselytism. Many Europeans didn't originate from Judea, but were Europeans who had converted to Judaism.

Meanwhile, most Jews who lived in Judea and the rest of Palestine converted to Christianity, then to Islam.

The irony is that Europeans are ethnic-cleansing the descendants of the original Jews from their homeland.

Eastern European Jews never fought on their own since they always had a super power supporting them. First, Great Britain, then the U.S.. They'd last 2-seconds without a super power supplying money and military aide.

I'll add that it was anti-Semitic immigration policy which encouraged Eastern European Jews to settle in Palestine. Neither the British nor U.S. wanted millions of Jewish immigrants who needed a place to go after WWII.

The Jews didn't even care where a new country was set up. It was the British who were fixated on Palestine because of the End Times prophecy. They were the original Zionists which started in the 1800s.

Jews have been persecuted in Europe for centuries. When they fled, they didn't run to Palestine because they didn't consider it their homeland. They fled to the U.S., France, Netherlands and many Muslim countries. But, not Palestine. The "Israel=homeland" is recently created propaganda to justify ethnic-cleansing and was never a goal to return historically by the Jewish people.

Stop buying into Israeli propaganda. Learn Judaism and read history books.

reply

You suck Keelai, just answer the original thread question ya freakish virgin alien space maggot.

reply

Are you endorsing riots now, maixiu?

reply

I'm endorsing the right of a people to defend their homeland against invasion. It's abundantly clear that democratic means will never be successful to that end. In fact, one can argue that the ruling class is determined to willfully, and gleefully, ignore the desire of the native stock to preserve their long and storied homeland. The gloves have to come off. This isn't some policy debate, like moving the decimal point around in the tax code, this is an existential threat to centuries of cultural and capital inheritance.

"It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in, and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invaders' hearth." Winston Churchill

reply

But, you're an invader. Are you going to return to Europe any time soon?

reply

I live on land that was settled by basis of treaty and bloodshed. Thus, I am not an invader but the rightful possessor of what land I own.

reply

Your poor excuses and justification for your land theft have failed. You're an invader who needs to leave.

reply

Are you referring to the land you're currently typing this from that was formerly inhabitated by the opposite of entitled cunts like your self?

reply

You're the entitled moron who is crying about "invaders". Leave, hypocrite!

reply

So are you saying your shitty, whitesque property that's technically owned by your homeowner's association wasn't previously "owned" by "Native Americans," as you like to call them?

Where's that moral high ground you were coming from again?

reply

Poor excuses to your pea brain, perhaps, but completely legitimate in terms of international law and precedence.

Enough of asking me, when will you live up to your own ideals and leave your place of birth?

reply

>I'm endorsing the right of a people to defend their homeland against invasion.

So you think it's morally right for these people to smash up police stations, libraries, hotels, looting properties and assault people.

Should it be acceptable to drag ethnic minorities out of their car and beat them?

Yes or no?

>In fact, one can argue that the ruling class is determined to willfully, and gleefully, ignore the desire of the native stock to preserve their long and storied homeland. The gloves have to come off. This isn't some policy debate, like moving the decimal point around in the tax code, this is an existential threat to centuries of cultural and capital inheritance.

This entire wave of rioting is done by a minority of the population who are marauding city-by-city smashing, assaulting and looting. They are smashing up shopping centres, smashing up libraries and attacking hotels who they assume are housing migrants. Do you think that's acceptable? The cause of the rioting too was fundamentally rooted in fake news about the identity of the Southport girl killer. The Southport girl killer was falsely labeled as a muslim asylum seeker. They were not. Didn't matter to the rioters.

And Tommy Robinson now functioning much like Ismail Haniyeh from Hamas directs these operations from abroad in his 5 star hotel having fled the country.

>It's abundantly clear that democratic means will never be successful to that end.

So you are outright openly pro-rioting, am I right? You are defending violent fascist thuggery.

Piece of shit.

reply

What alternative to violence is currently open to the sizeable number of native British stock who wish to see their homeland preserved?

reply

Win an election. There's no public support for making the UK an ethnostate.

They don't get the right to impose their worldview on the majority by force.

And are you going to answer this: Should it be acceptable to set public libraries on fire? Should it be acceptable to drag ethnic minorities out of their car and beat them?

reply

"Win an election"

Thank you. I wasn't sure if you were that hopelessly naive, but you've confirmed it.

reply

>Thank you. I wasn't sure if you were that hopelessly naive, but you've confirmed it.

What's the naivety here? If you want extreme policies like these rioters want put into play, you have to actually have a democratic mandate.

And as usual, because you're such a cowardly bitch - you refused to answer my question about rioting.

reply

>"It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in, and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invaders' hearth." Winston Churchill

That's your comparison here? Should these men, these rioters have the moral right to kill all Asian and Black heritage men they run into?

reply

You, sir, are completely incapable of nuanced thought. You're probably reasonably intelligent, what a waste that you use that intelligence chasing your tail in this fashion.

reply

Not an answer to my question. You're defending the mass thuggery going on across the UK over the last 5 days. Were you this defensive of the BLM riots in the USA? They're directly comparable in methods and behaviour.

reply

Here's a clue, Einstein, I don't give a fuck about that or any of your other tedious "questions".

reply

That's not my problem. I'll ask them anyway shitbrains, and your perpetual public cowardice to stand by your insinuations and suggestions will be present for everyone to behold.

You feckless, fascist piece of shit.

reply

You've leveled those accusations at me countless times. Will it ever dawn on you that you're a broken record and that I'm unconcerned about whatever tiresome epithets you rage post?

reply

>You've leveled those accusations at me countless times.

And I'll keep doing them. I don't give a flying fuck what you think.

>Will it ever dawn on you that you're a broken record and that I'm unconcerned about whatever tiresome epithets you rage post?

Don't care, shitbrains. I think you're scum and will never cease reminding you of this.

reply

>Cause in Brit-tard land, the new left-wing "Labour" Prime Minister announcing he's making a special police unit to deal with street protests against ISISlamic immigration.

By "protests" you mean riots, right?

>So.. . tell me this, if the number one crime in a country is being against ISISlam... then how is that anything other than Sharia law?

No, the "number one crime" is smashing up police stations, libraries, hotels, looting properties and assaulting people.

reply

No it's because they dared to speak about ISISlam you demented freakshow of a so-called human being.

There was no government crackdown like this on BLM riots, you forgot about those didn't you, because you have the memory of a goldfish (but you aren't as well endowed)

reply

>No it's because they dared to speak about ISISlam you demented freakshow of a so-called human being.

No, it's not. There are actual riots going on in the UK. They are attacking police cars, police stations, police. They are setting fire to public buildings and looting shops. Do you think that's acceptable?

>There was no government crackdown like this on BLM riots, you forgot about those didn't you, because you have the memory of a goldfish (but you aren't as well endowed)

This is the UK, genius. Not the USA. There have not been BLM riots here.

reply

There were no riots in UK in 2020?

Did Winston Churchill's statue throw itself to the ground then? Holy shit LOL

reply

Skavau is clearly suffering from some mental illness.

it's the same old game, if it doesn't back up his argument, it doesn't exist. he demands "evidence"

when you show him the evidence, he says "so what?" and stops responding.

reply

He's a poisonous misguided dork like every other Islam defender.

The 49 million pitiful souls who actually voted for Biden are - well, really pitiful. That's all there is to it

reply

Where have I defended Islam?

>The 49 million pitiful souls who actually voted for Biden are - well, really pitiful. That's all there is to it

I'll await evidence that Biden had 30+ million fraudulent votes.

reply

>There were no riots in UK in 2020?

Show me some riots in the UK in 2020 anywhere near on the level of the riots in the last week from the far-right in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom#:~:text=The%20first%20solidarity%20protests%20in,Stand%20Up%20to%20Racism%20banners.

The scale of this was nowhere near what we've seen in the last week.

reply

Islam should be eradicated in Europe. It should be illegal. All Muslims should be rounded up and deported back to some Islamic country. And if none will take them then they should be put on an island somewhere. Islam has no place in Europe. Muslims should be persona non grata. Christianity needs to be made the state religion. And I'm saying this as someone who is not religious. We are in desperate need of religion. When Europe was more Christian the world was a better place.

reply

Back to your memeposting again, are we?

What of muslims who were born in the UK (some of whom who are white)

Also Albania, Kosovo and Bosnia are Muslim majority countries.

reply

I'm in a faschy mood today. So yes, unfortunately for the Muslims who were born there they are simply shit out of luck. They have to leave or practice their religion in secret.

reply

You admit that you're a Fascist.

You're not practicing Christianity when you discuss persecuting anyone. Does this mean you need to round-up and deport yourself?

reply

[deleted]

What happens when fascism comes for you? Or are you a nihilist?

reply

I'm White, culturally right wing, and not a degenerate, so I'll be safe.
And no I'm not a nihilist.

reply

Now this post 100% goes too far, and I have reported it to the moderators.

reply

How does it go to far? I'm clearly fucking with her. It's funny.
Stop being a pansy and a snitch.

reply

>How does it go to far? I'm clearly fucking with her. It's funny.

"haha I was just joking about wanting to kill you".

You keep pretending you're just joking when its convenient. Maybe the mods will accept that, we'll see.

reply

You're misinterpreting what I am saying. I'm not talking about slaughter. I'm talking about being rounded up and removed from society.

reply

And what did the Nazis do later on to the Jews? And rounded up and removed in what way? For what crime?

reply

Yeah, I was referring to the part where they are mass arrested and expelled from the country not the part where they end up in gas chambers. That's a little extreme, even for me.

reply

So for what crimes should Keelai be done for? And where should they be expelled to exactly?

Also the Nazis didn't expel a lot of Jews, they progressively ate away at their liberties and put them in work camps way before mass extermination.

reply

So for what crimes should Keelai be done for? And where should they be expelled to exactly?
For the crime of being a far left retard. And I changed my mind, I don't want her expelled, I like the work camp idea. That's where we should send all woke retards, to work camps. And before you jump to conclusions and try to twist my words, no, I am not talking about death camps or extermination camps, just work camps. I don't exactly know what she'll be working on in there, but we'll find something productive for her to do.

reply

>For the crime of being a far left retard.

So presumably you want to round me up and either exile me or put me to a work camp?

I thought you weren't in favour of state oppression like this, but now you are?

>That's where we should send all woke retards, to work camps. And before you jump to conclusions and try to twist my words, no, I am not talking about death camps or extermination camps, just work camps.

And the conditions of these work camps?

reply

So presumably you want to round me up and either exile me or put me to a work camp?
I though you said you're not a far-left retard. You can be really annoying though, so I don't know what we do with you. Maybe a re-education camp? What do you think? Does that sound fair?

I thought you weren't in favour of state oppression like this, but now you are?
I told you I'm in a fascy mood and want to express my faschy thoughts. Why are you always trying to ruin my good time?

And the conditions of these work camps?
Adequate.

reply

>I though you said you're not a far-left retard. You can be really annoying though, so I don't know what we do with you. Maybe a re-education camp? What do you think? Does that sound fair?

No. All forms of fascism and authoritarianism are evil. And again, it wouldn't matter what I or Keelai might say. It would be the authorities who would make such a declaration.

>I told you I'm in a fascy mood and want to express my faschy thoughts. Why are you always trying to ruin my good time?

So why should anyone ever take any of your opinions on anything seriously if you can just bitch out and claim you never meant them ever?

>Adequate.

Not an answer. What does "adequate" mean speciifcally?

reply

No. All forms of fascism and authoritarianism are evil. And again, it wouldn't matter what I or Keelai might say. It would be the authorities who would make such a declaration.
And what if I end up being that authority?

So why should anyone ever take any of your opinions on anything seriously if you can just bitch out and claim you never meant them ever?
Maybe they shouldn't take it as seriously as you do. Others seem to be able to distinguish between hyperbole and trolling and serious discussion. You seem to have a problem with this. You take everything too seriously.

Not an answer. What does "adequate" mean speciifcally?
It means adequate — good enough. Don't worry about it. The Muslims will be fine. We've got people working on it. Good people. It's all good.

reply

>And what if I end up being that authority?

Why the fuck would you personally be that authority?

>Maybe they shouldn't take it as seriously as you do. Others seem to be able to distinguish between hyperbole and trolling and serious discussion. You seem to have a problem with this. You take everything too seriously.

You seem to just pretend you don't mean anything when you're cornered. It's genuinely cowardly.

You just defer to trolling like a child whenever you're challenged. Your read on whats going on the UK is outrageously bad.

reply

Why the fuck would you personally be that authority?
You never know. I might be well connected and have influence on people who might end up being in power.

You seem to just pretend you don't mean anything when you're cornered. It's genuinely cowardly.
Not true, I have had many conversations with people here, including you, where I told you exactly what I believe and have not backed away from it. But sometimes I'm in a hostile mood and want to provoke people. Today is one of those days.

reply

Radicalised by events that you don't understand happening an ocean away from you. Genuinely pathetic.

reply

"Radicalised by events that you don't understand"

Since you typically place this burden upon others, do you have anything concrete that you are basing this statement on?

"...an ocean away from you."

That carries some weight rhetorically, but what specifically are you implying here? Should everything you say in reference to an occurrence outside of the UK be discounted as such? If not, how should whatever you say without specific relevance to the UK be regarded without anything but a token dismissal?

reply

>Since you typically place this burden upon others, do you have anything concrete that you are basing this statement on?

He seems to think the riots here are from people who hold the same goals as he does. To be sure, *some* of them might - but there's no good evidence that they do at-large. In addition, right-wing blocs and political groupings and activists who express sympathies and/or express apologetics for the people behind these riots do not say anything near what he's saying. He's using them as a proxy for why his beliefs are somehow gaining. He also seems to think they have popular support. They do not.

In addition, the overall numbers of the rioters are small compared to the UK population.

>That carries some weight rhetorically, but what specifically are you implying here? Should everything you say in reference to an occurrence outside of the UK be discounted as such? If not, how should whatever you say without specific relevance to the UK be regarded without anything but a token dismissal?

If I started making declarative statements about USA contemporary culture, I'd expect to be called out for it. When it comes to gun laws, for instance, I don't ever say that the USA should enact harsh restrictions - nor pretend to know what are the right paths. I recognise the historical context of US gun culture and laws.

reply

Not only are you hopelessly obtuse, but also a pussy of breath taking proportion.

reply

Because I think maybe that implying someone should be killed is bad?

Perhaps when you fucking man up and own your positions and answer some actual questions rather than running away like a little bitch, I'll take your observations here about being a man even slightly seriously.

Wanker

reply

Imagine the chutzpah involved in spending your days whining endlessly about the alleged fascist tendencies of others only to grasp about trying to silence the speech of those with whom you disagree, to say nothing of your acknowledged proclivities for "watch lists". You're scum, pure and simple.

Now go run off to your precious mods amd try to have someone else silenced because you're too big a pussy to deal with words you don't like.

reply

>Imagine the chutzpah involved in spending your days whining endlessly about the alleged fascist tendencies of others only to grasp about trying to silence the speech of those

You think there's no difference between a private forum and the state?

>with whom you disagree, to say nothing of your acknowledged proclivities for "watch lists". You're scum, pure and simple.

At no point have I ever reported a single post from someone purely because I disagree with them. And I have no more proclivity for a watch list than any nation has now. Or do you think every single democratic country on earth is fascist? All of them will keep tabs on potential terrorists. I've asked you this multiple times, and it's just an example of a question you puss out of every time.

>Now go run off to your precious mods amd try to have someone else silenced because you're too big a pussy to deal with words you don't like.

Has nothing to do with words but actual threats, or incitement to violence.

And like you personally give a rats ass about free speech, you scumbag hypocrite.

reply

"Oooh, Mr. Mod, could you olease scrub from existence those words that cause me discomfort? I've got a bad case of sand in my vagina because of those super scary words!"

What an absolute munch, you are.

reply

>"Oooh, Mr. Mod, could you olease scrub from existence those words that cause me discomfort? I've got a bad case of sand in my vagina because of those super scary words!"

Has nothing to do with causing me, specifically, discomfort. And by the way, the mod removed it.

Is that moderator now a fascist?

You think I'm terrible for this, what on earth do you think of people like curiousmind and tvfan who want to empower the state to persecute people who hold political beliefs that they don't like?

reply

He never said that he was. Recognizing the benefits of a state religion like Christianity and not being a true believer are not mutually exclusive. I'm assuming he's referring to the sociological conditions that come that from a generalized culture that has tangible advantages towards social cohesion and productivity, particularly in reference to those that are easily influenced like yourself.

I may not be a practicing Christian, but I'd much prefer that my neighbors were outside singing Christmas Carols rather than slinging crack rock or fuming about the blasphemy of women not adhering to Sharia. Which of these scenarios is more likely in a nominally Christian society?

reply

That's exactly right. You're one of the few people on this site who really gets me. But to be fair to Keelai, I did tell her I'm a fascist. I usually say that when I'm dealing with far left retards. It usually completely disarms them. I mean what can you say to someone who tells you right to your face that they hate you and they want to purge you from society by force. It leaves them powerless.

reply

Approaching it in that way dissolves assumed pretenses and removes one of their stereotypically assumed high ground views. If you can you acknowledge that without embarrassment or acquiescence to their presumed beliefs, the power of their assumptions is stripped and they are forced to resort to reason and pragmatism, both of which often don't turn out in their favor.

reply

Exactly. Like I said, you're one of the few people here who get me. You're able to see past all my trolling and incendiary posts down to the core of what I'm actually saying and trying to do here. It sucks that you have to go back to work. I'm going to miss your posts. Hopefully you'll still pop in on the weekends to say hello.

reply

I'll be around and I hope you are as well.

I wish I had students like you. That could be interpreted as condescending, but that's not my intention. I've got my main gig going on, but I occasionally teach philosophy and political science as a side job and students aren't willing to put themselves out there for the sake of discussion anymore. Discussion about topics feels sterilized and limited by such pretenses encountered here and everywhere else.

I'd honestly say more, but this is my last week of chilling and I'm already taking advantage of my Costco run yesterday (65.99 handles of Patron Silver, can you believe that shit?) and I don't want to come off as rambling, which is especially easy for me through text.

But yeah, I'll be around. I hope you are as well.

reply

You teach philosophy? That's awesome. I was really into it back in college. I loved diving into Hume, Kant, Mill, and Wittgenstein. But trying to read Hegel was bitch. Just when I thought I got what he was saying, something else would pop up and totally confuse me. I should take a refresher course online. It might be fun.


Anyways, I'm glad you'll still be around.

reply

I do, just as an adjunct a few community colleges within driving distance. It doesn't amount to much financially but I enjoy it.

Hume is a favorite of mine; he's one of the few philosophers I'd probably enjoy the company of in person, if such a thing were possible. Kant's ideas are essentially the basis of everything that has come afterward and, though the Critique of Pure Reason is a work where if you're reading more than five pages in a day and pretend to comprehend what's being described you're doing it wrong, you really can't escape his ideas. Hegel is equally readable and profound, even if his specific views beyond metaphysics and epistemology are dated. Wittgenstein's works are still relevant, and are actually related to my PhD thesis that was oriented around the works of Willard Van Quine, though my specific contention related to the word "is" as first explicitly described Kierkegaard. It's laughably pedantic now but I have a funny looking Doctoral robe in my closet as a reminder.

But yes, I'll still be here.

reply

That's awesome. Back in the day, around 2007, there was a chat site called Stickam. We had a philosophy chatroom that we would all meet in on Saturdays and talk about these ideas. I've forgotten most of it, but I remember really enjoying reading this stuff and talking about it with like minded people. We had students, amateurs, and teachers like you in our group. It was fun times.

reply

Curiousmind just said that Keelai should be exterminated.

Any thoughts on that? Keelai may not be the easiest guy to get along with, but I'd like your thoughts on this.

reply

Considering the source, that does seem to be on par.

reply

I don't think he/it should be exterminated.

I think that Keelai's absurd views should be on display for anyone to observe and potentially, and by that I mean probably and/or hopefully, discount.

reply

I suppose I meant more thoughts on curiousmind saying that. You think that's acceptable? You once got at me for calling Nerdrotic a mental midget.

reply

I try not to worry myself about what is considered acceptable these days, particularly in the context of Moviechat where anyone can express their views without the typical social ramifications.

reply

Perhaps its just me, but I don't really like being chummy and friendly to those who openly express their desire to persecute me.

Be it either an Islamist, or tankie, or fascist, or theocrat. All of them wish me harm. There's plenty of posters on here who, if they could, would persecute me. Leaves a very sour taste in my mouth.

reply

You take things far too seriously here.

I don't wish you harm, and on the contrary, I've tried to demonstrate friendly gestures to you on more than one occasion now. I think the disposition that you're presenting is your choice at this point.

reply

To be fair, I didn't say you did specifically - I was referring to other posters on here. I was just expressing my position on this stuff.

reply

That makes sense.

Bear with me though; you've got my recognition, but your fights are still yours to fight.

reply

To be clear, I don't expect you to jump in and defend me. I am only probing you on this because you're the only right-winger-type or antagonist on here, for want of a better word - so far, that I am even able to get to acknowledge the level of baseless accusations thrown at me. I can't even get this far with anyone else on here.

reply

After all of the kind things I've said to you, and gestures like bumping your music thread, you still refer to me as an antagonist.

That's not very nice, Skavau. You hurt my feelings there.

And you still refer to me as a right-winger. You know nothing, Jon Snow.

reply

I'm using it in its loosest sense - people who I have argued with on here repeatedly.

reply

You do realize that you are asking SeminalAnus about his own sock account?

reply

No, they're not socks. They're very different.

reply

Bi-curious is the dumbed down account that SeminalAnus uses to affirm how "awesome" he is.

reply

If I had a butterfly rash on my face I might get where you're attempting to come from, but to the rest you're just a cunt.

reply

SeminalAnus (or bi-curious"mind"), you are cute when you get angry and start using the 'C-word'. I bet your ears are turning red and you are stomping your little feet.

reply

I'm not the one racking up posts on a sock account. What are you actually trying to accomplish with all of these spiteful posts?

reply

Aw, that's so cute. You are "awesome," SeminalAnus (or bi-curious"mind").

reply

That's about the response that I expected from you.

reply

How "awesome" that was, SeminalAnus (or bi-curious"mind").

reply

Your attempts at trolling are laughable. You contribute exactly zero to the conversation and are nothing but a pest. And I don't know about Semi but I don't use sock accounts, and I doubt he does either. You on the other hand are almost certainly a sock.

It's clear that you don't have what it takes to participate in the conversation, the intelligence required is beyond your grasp.
Run along now fool. You're embarrassing yourself.

reply

LOL! Right on cue!
Bi-curious"mind," SeminalAnus and you have some awesome "conversations" together! Ha ha ha!

reply

It pains me how retarded you are.

reply

Ha ha! You and your "better half" (SeminalAnus) have a little bit of schizophrenia going on between "the two of you," but that doesn't pain me! I find it quite entertaining! It's awesome! LMAO!

reply

Did you ever wonder if your mom gave dad a blowjob right before she kissed you goodnight?

reply

No, that never crossed my mind.

Did you ever wonder if I performed anal sex on your mom right before you performed oral sex on me? I bet you were thinking, "Mmmmm, that tastes familiar!" Ha ha ha ha!

reply

No, that never crossed my mind.
Now it has. Your welcome.

reply

Don't be embarrassed. Licking your mom's shit off of my cock isn't good, but it certainly isn't the worst thing that ever happened to you.

reply

You're trying too hard... And failing miserably.
What else you got simple Jack?

reply

Wow. How long did it take for you to compose that zinger?

reply

This you?
https://i.redd.it/pzgofgmdtis81.jpg

reply

Your link didn't work for me. All I got was a warning from Norton in large red letters warning me that the site was prohibited. I can only imagine what kind of pedophilia or other aberrant material you are attempting to post here.

reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a2_Pc7WF0w

reply

Sorry, but I am not clicking on any of your gay porn or pedophilia links.

reply

Is there anything you can do or are you completely useless?

reply

I do not click on links posted by one half of a schizophrenic sock team that displays sexual predator tendencies.

reply

So useless then. I guess your lot in life is to be a burden to society.

reply

LOL at the sock! "You are trying too hard."

reply

It's a tragedy that good people die everyday while people like you continue to exist.

reply

Woaaa!! Another well thought out 'zinger' by one half of the schizo sock team! Keep up the good work!

reply

It was not intended to be a "zinger" just an observation.

reply

Okay, Sock, whatever you say.

reply

That seems like an extreme position to take. But then you look at what they think about apostates and non-muslims and your suggestion is tame in comparison.

reply

It is. But extreme circumstances require extreme measures and Europe is fighting for its future.

reply

Liberals very easily become bitches to such groups. They are the first to be infiltrated

reply

Yet they believe they're in control

They're like someone who let Jeffrey Dahmer into their apartment lol

reply

The Crux of the heading is true. Islamists will sooner turn modern euroopean

reply

Have you noticed there's now a pattern to their lying? First they will claim that whatever is bothering ordinary people is "not real," and they're just "being paranoid," despite all the evidence. In fact, I've even told my brother a few times, "It's not a conspiracy theory if it's happening right in front of you." Then, when the accusations of "conspiracy theories" and "paranoia" don't work, they'll then switch to, "Oh it was always like that," or "It's not as bad as you think," again, completely contradicting how bad something is. Then they go to, "It's the new normal, get over it."

reply

"they will claim that whatever is bothering ordinary people is "not real," "

Sorry, American"girl"69, but you zombies that watch Faux "news" and are brainwashed into thinking that your 401ks are sinking and your groceries cost ten times more and that you don't have a job . . . when in reality none of that is true . . . well, you guys do not meet the criteria to be "ordinary people."

reply

"How long until they switch to saying "you just have to deal with it" instead?"


Worse, they actually say Europe deserves it because of colonialism. So it's revenge.

This is ignoring the fact that some of the worst hit countries had no colonial pasts yet are being invaded by 3rd world migrants.

If it's revenge they want then why didn't Japan drop two nukes on America or move 100 million of their people to New York and California and turn it into a wasteland? How come they chose to stay and rebuild their homeland into an economic superpower instead of fleeing en masse to the west? Going by leftard logic, they should all be here kicking up a stink like muslims and africans in europe

Leftists have an unending list of excuses for third worlders crawling all over western countries but will never admit the cold hard truth - they're here because they lack the motivation, desire and intelligence to build decent societies for themselves, so they come to our countries so we can do it for them, and tell us we deserve to be replaced. Fuck them.

reply