Study: 74% of 'Covid' deaths directly linked to the vaxx
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968
shareMy entire immediate family got COVID within a couple months of each other. Those that were vaccinated and boosted were terribly sick for weeks. Those that were not, we all thought we had a cold. No fever, lasted a few days.
Now all of the vaxxed have cancer.
Total fucking scam that is still costing people their lives.
There is data all over everywhere that consistently demonstrates that you are much less likely to have negative outcomes from COVID after taking the vaccine.
shareDid they do 2 studies of the same people before and after vaccination? If not, any results are debatably inconclusive.
shareWhat? As in people who had COVID *before* the vaccine and then when they get COVID *after* the vaccine?
What they do is simply measure the chance of hospitalisation from COVID between unvaccinated and vaccinated people.
Yes. The only way to know for sure is to have it before and after....or else you're just saying it's "Safe & Effective" and providing no evidence of the claims.
Almost no one went to the hospital for covid.
LOL!
share>Yes. The only way to know for sure is to have it before and after....or else you're just saying it's "Safe & Effective" and providing no evidence of the claims.
No, it's not. We can record the likelihood of hospital admission for unvaccinated people vs. vaccinated people.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19hospitaladmissionsbyvaccinationandpregnancystatusengland/8december2020to31august2021
There's tons of data on this from many countries.
What "baseline" did they use for their conclusions and results?
shareAmong both pregnant and non-pregnant women, age-standardised rates of coronavirus (COVID-19) hospital admission were lower among those who were vaccinated compared with those who were unvaccinated when first infected.
COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a similar reduction in the rate of COVID-19 hospital admission in pregnant and non-pregnant women, suggesting that vaccination is as effective in pregnant women at reducing COVID-19 hospital admission as it is in non-pregnant women.
Feel free to download the datset provided on the website.
So they did't have a baseline. That's all you had to say.
Although I suspected it, I asked to see how many excuses and lies you would come up with.
Dude, go and read the data yourself.
Among both pregnant and non-pregnant women, age-standardised rates of coronavirus (COVID-19) hospital admission were lower among those who were vaccinated compared with those who were unvaccinated when first infected.
COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a similar reduction in the rate of COVID-19 hospital admission in pregnant and non-pregnant women, suggesting that vaccination is as effective in pregnant women at reducing COVID-19 hospital admission as it is in non-pregnant women.
Feel free to download the xml provided on the website.
I read it, they didn't have a baseline.
shareI simply do not believe that you either read, nor understand the data at all.
"Among women who were identified as not pregnant when they were first infected with COVID-19, the rate of COVID-19 hospital admission was 1,488.1 per 100,000 infections for those who were unvaccinated. This is compared with 421.6 per 100,000 infections for those who had received one dose of a vaccine, and 435.3 per 100,000 infections for those who had received two doses."
Why the large drop-off?
I read it, there is no baseline.
shareI simply do not believe that you either read, nor understand the data at all.
"Among women who were identified as not pregnant when they were first infected with COVID-19, the rate of COVID-19 hospital admission was 1,488.1 per 100,000 infections for those who were unvaccinated. This is compared with 421.6 per 100,000 infections for those who had received one dose of a vaccine, and 435.3 per 100,000 infections for those who had received two doses."
Why the large drop-off?
I will NEVER stop replying until you answer.
Careful, he's going to chimp out.
shareFunded by Pfizer???
Yes, I've smelled that bullshit before.
No. You assume all studies into this are funded by Pfizer? Is the UK government funded by Pfizer?
shareWhat about the studies linking the "vaccine" with fast growing cancers? Blood clots? Heart problems?
The entirety of the US gov't and the mainstream media is in the pocket of Pfizer and other big pharmaceuticals. Wake up, you're being lied to by people with an agenda that is obvious to everybody but you and your kind. It's easy to connect the dots between big pharma, the corrupt political establishment, big tech and China. Anyone who took the "vaccine" is a fool for the propaganda. At some point, you have to wake up and smell it.
>What about the studies linking the "vaccine" with fast growing cancers? Blood clots? Heart problems?
What ones? Name them please.
>The entirety of the US gov't and the mainstream media is in the pocket of Pfizer and other big pharmaceuticals. Wake up, you're being lied to by people with an agenda that is obvious to everybody but you and your kind. It's easy to connect the dots between big pharma, the corrupt political establishment, big tech and China. Anyone who took the "vaccine" is a fool for the propaganda. At some point, you have to wake up and smell it.
I was not aware the UK government was part of the US government and "mainstream media". I'll ask again: You assume all studies into this are funded by Pfizer? Is the UK government funded by Pfizer?
You have a conspiracy mindset where you automatically dismiss any and all studies that contradict your position. It is a blatant confirmation bias.
Conspiracy theory? It's all obvious to me. You're just one of the deluded masses. Funny how everything considered a "conspiracy theory" (just another term to demonize the opposition) 3-4yrs ago has been proven absolutely correct.
shareAnd now Big Pharma is going to profit at least ten times more from the claims due to the death and injuries caused by their poisonous jab.
Compensation and Accountability are not enough, they should be convicted and imprisoned.
The top culprits should hang.
TVFan again revealing his murderous bloodthirsty mentality. Why would Big Pharma profit from claims against them?
shareThey have immunity, dipshit.
shareRight, they have immunity. So how would they *profit* from people claiming against them? It doesn't make them any money.
shareSo how would they *profit* from people claiming against them?
Through the Insurance companies. share
Wow. All people have to say about this sort of thing is I'm sorry, but it's heartbreaking really. I don't really have any family and the ones that I had were cruel to me so I'm OK but for those of us that lost actual loved ones man...
shareIt's horrible but people will have to be hit over the head with it to realize it. Had two family members diagnosed two days apart, one already lost a third of their colon.
share