Just like they did with “vaccine”. They’ve now how to change the definition of “bloodbath” to cover for the mentally ill Democrat rectum’s claims.
Can’t wait for the bloodbath in November.
https://youtu.be/510OKQ0lDtA?si=F7Da5pxEzXLjD49C
This has to be one of the most terminally online videos from PJW that I've ever seen
shareFacts are Facts, and your ad hominem attacks of PJW doesn't change those facts.
shareRegime bitch Skavau is seething over PJW exposing the regime’s creepy authoritarian tactics and so resorts to ad hom.
Pathetic. Especially when you contrast this with Skavau’s smug pretence that he’s some kind of objective truth-seeker 🤣
Dude’s a partisan prick on a constant gaslighting mission, and nobody buys his bullshit.
Congratulations. You made me actually check specifically the validity of PJWs claims here.
His March 17th timestamped screenshot sources *Dictionary.com*. Which still has that definition: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bloodbath
His March 21st timestamped screenshot does *not source* dictionary.com and is instead using the auto-complete result from google which takes it from Oxford Languages.
Not that there's really anything meaningfully different between "a ruthless slaughter of a great number of people; massacre." and "an event or situation in which many people are killed in a violent manner." This has to be one of the most pathetic excuses to make a video ever.
More of your dumbass semantics.
The point is about Google's new woke definition of a word that was taken out of context and propagandized by the TDS woke media.
TDS = Trump's Delusional Supporters. That describes you perfectly.
shareDude, the very premise of the video by PJW is literally rooted in semantics.
>The point is about Google's new woke definition of a word that was taken out of context and propagandized by the TDS woke media.
How is this a "new" definition? There's almost no difference between the terms. Who is even talking about the definition of "bloodbath" anywhere?
Congratulations, you’ve outed yourself as a deceitful regime bitch again by strawmanning PJW.
He links to the Google search results definition of ‘Bloodbath’ (not what shows up on the Dictionary.com website as you deceitfully tried to pretend he did) and he’s right, it now omits the inconvenient definition in a corrupt effort to demonise Trump.
Your gaslighting has epically failed again, ya lying sack of shit.
As I said: Not that there's really anything meaningfully different between "a ruthless slaughter of a great number of people; massacre." and "an event or situation in which many people are killed in a violent manner." This has to be one of the most pathetic excuses to make a video ever.
shareWTF are you talking about? PJW’s whole point is that the definition of Bloodbath that Trump was using - ‘a period of disastrous loss or reversal’ was removed by Google in a devious attempt to portray him as threatening a violent ‘Bloodbath’.
Having utterly humiliated yourself by strawmanning PJW’s point and getting called out for it, you’re now pivoting to some completely irrelevant issue that has absolutely nothing to do with PJW’s point.
Your nasty attempt to smear PJW has failed, your shitty sophistry has failed, and all you’ve done is make a massive prick of yourself… again.
When will you stop being such a cringe twat?
>WTF are you talking about? PJW’s whole point is that the definition of Bloodbath that Trump was using - ‘a period of disastrous loss or reversal’ was removed by Google in a devious attempt to portray him as threatening a violent ‘Bloodbath’.
Trump specifically spelled out a definition of bloodbath, did he? He actually specifically noted that on the campaign trail? Okay, so he was referring to the auto industry (although he did add "for the whole country", typical poor Trump phrasing).
---
"China now is building a couple of massive plants, where they're going to build the cars in Mexico and … they think that they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China. If you're listening, President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal, those big, monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans, and you're going to sell the cars to us, no. We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars.
"If I get elected. Now, if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the whole, that's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a bloodbath for the country. That'll be the least of it. But they're not gonna sell those cars."
----
What's notable is that factcheckers are rejecting Joe Biden's insinuations about his phrasing:
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
Pretty sure everyone knows that language can be used non-literally, although Trump is definitely fearmongering and alluding to potential violence (or could be so interpreted).
It’s embarrassing watching you try and dig yourself out of this. Trump’s use of ‘bloodbath’ was abundantly clear, as was the obviously deceitful attempt by the regime media to take it out of context and misconstrue it. As usual, you mindlessly run defence for the regime.
Your nasty attempt to smear PJW has failed, your shitty sophistry has failed, your pivot to another point as distraction from your humiliating blunder has failed, and all you’ve done is make a massive prick of yourself… again.
When will you stop being such a cringe twat?
>It’s embarrassing watching you try and dig yourself out of this. Trump’s use of ‘bloodbath’ was abundantly clear, as was the obviously deceitful attempt by the regime media to take it out of context and misconstrue it. As usual, you mindlessly run defence for the regime.
I specifically pointed out that factcheckers, that you so deride criticised Bidens phrasing.
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
Pretty sure everyone knows that language can be used non-literally, although Trump is definitely fearmongering and alluding to potential violence (or could be so interpreted).
>When will you stop being such a cringe twat?
When will you stop being such a piece of shit hateful fascist?
None of this distractionary blather is working, you silly prick.
You’ve been called out for your blatant strawmanning of PJW. Your only way to save yourself now would be to apologise for your filthy act of deceit and vow to stop being a lying sack of shit.
Hurling abuse after you’ve been caught out only makes you look like an even bigger twat.
Now, humiliate yourself further by farting out a mindless copy-paste of your last post, distracting NOBODY from your unbelievably cringe failure to smear PJW with an obvious lie, and make another shitty excuse for your atrocious behaviour in this thread. Go!…
>It’s embarrassing watching you try and dig yourself out of this. Trump’s use of ‘bloodbath’ was abundantly clear, as was the obviously deceitful attempt by the regime media to take it out of context and misconstrue it. As usual, you mindlessly run defence for the regime.
I specifically pointed out that factcheckers, that you so deride criticised Bidens phrasing.
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
Pretty sure everyone knows that language can be used non-literally, although Trump is definitely fearmongering and alluding to potential violence (or could be so interpreted).
>When will you stop being such a cringe twat?
When will you stop being such a piece of shit hateful fascist?
>Hurling abuse after you’ve been caught out only makes you look like an even bigger twat.
You are in no position to accuse anyone of being abusive. It is your default behaviour.
I had to click on the YouTube link to learn that "PJW" is "Paul Joseph Watson."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Joseph_Watson
Another 60 seconds I'll never get back...
Ugh.
I can't stand him.
He tilts his head up too much giving a view of his nostrils which has either hair, boogers or both and I keep getting distracted and disgusted by that so I can't watch.
Because Libertarians, and anyone who claims they're Independent have had a picture painted of Trump thanks to the MSM who have TDS so bad, I just sit here and think to myself, how on earth can one man of all people in Donald Trump get this many people on the Left worked up to start changing definitions to words?? It's almost coming off as fake outrage or a severe case of delusion of grandeur on their part??
shareAh yes, the immense change from "a ruthless slaughter of a great number of people; massacre." to "an event or situation in which many people are killed in a violent manner."
shareGoogle Obama changes the definition of the word deported.
Osama was one slick playa...leaning back with a Newport in hand...he came up with a plan to make it look like he was deporting people when in fact he was importing more then ever.
Before Obama, at the border there were 2 migrants...got aways and returned.
When someone was caught at the border they went under the retuned column.
Obama said get rid of the term return and start labeling anyone caught as deported.
This inflated deportation numbers when in fact it was false.
Osamas unnacomanied minor program was the first large effort to strategically fly migrants around the country.
2k a month for anyone willing to host a migrant.
So a 19 year old gang member can host a 14 year old nephew for 2k a month.
Of course he did.
Those snakes always manipulate, deceive, obfuscate and lie by changing around words.
He did similar with the propaganda bill and the pedo database.
not surprised, dems are going to hijack the election again.
RIP
America
1776-2021
I have a nice collection of old dictionaries and I encourage you to keep an old one as well, just for shits and giggles.
A nice law would be that established words can only be changed 10 years later or something like that.
Good law.
And news stories can only be reported 1 year after they occur, unless the public’s immediate danger is in question.
And while we’re at it. All laws would be voted to be queued, with a final vote after 1 year. So said laws can be properly a analysed and torn apart. With each change, it goes back in line.
It's settled them. When Skynet takes over, we'll help write the laws : P
shareSkynet isn't happening, let alone taking over...
And if it does,,,it will just think we need to be painted in rainbows, and be gay.
Gaynet
sharehttps://www.homosensual.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/download-1.jpg
Give me all your clothes has a whole new meaning.
‘Your anal virginities. Give them to me. Now.’
Because their entire ideology is wholly dependent on lies, hyperbole, the twisting of facts and appearances. There is no substance. It's why they argue the way they do. It's all emotional blather.
share