Michelle Obama could 'sneak her way' into the 2024 presidential race, NY Post columnist warns - Politics Discussion

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Is this a troll post or are you unironically arguing that Michelle Obama is trans?

reply

[–] robocat893 (16257) a year ago

He's obviously obsessed with transgenders since he can't stop talking about them. Then he doubled down on stupid talking about rigged elections. Sorry but stupid cannot be fixed.

reply

[–] tvfan (14567) a year ago

Big Mike is a trans.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Evidence please

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17838) a year ago

The clearly visible penis that has been highlighted several times over the years?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

She literally has two daughters.

Are you unironically going to propose that Michelle Obama is transgendered purely because of some pictures over the years?

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17838) a year ago

Show us the pregnancy photos....you can't, they don't exist.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

You are genuinely a conspiracy nutcase.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2014/jan/17/michelle-obama-at-50

You are genuinely claiming, unironically, that Michelle Obama's daughters aren't really hers and that all this time she's been a man. Purely because you think she looks masculine and have some grainy pictures to show for it.

reply

[–] legnadibrom (6520) a year ago

her teeths too big for her mouth

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

EVIDENCE!!! EVIDENCE!!!!! WHERE'S MY EVIDENCE!!??

https://streamable.com/el7iai

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

That could literally be a crease. Shitty low definition "UFO" tier evidence.

You do realise she has two daughters, right?

Is there a single conspiracy theory you don't believe in?

reply

[–] tvfan (14567) a year ago

Big Mike and Newsom were expected as possible last minute announcements.
Rigging the election for either is almost a certainty.

reply

[–] robocat893 (16257) a year ago

Democrats are so much smarter than Republicans. The Democrats outsmarted all you Republicans by rigging the 2020 election involving thousands if not millions of co-conspirators across state lines without getting caught or having a single problem. Not one. Knowing human behavior that's impossible but the Democrats pulled it off. So with Republicans not being able to provide any evidence of a rigged election in 2020 the Democrats will just do it again in 2024. How does it feel to be stupider than millions of other Americans?

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

So you just admitted the 2020 Election was rigged for Biden to win, right?? I mean, RIGHT?? YES or NO??

reply

[–] robocat893 (16257) a year ago

I was just goofing with this post you replied to that was meant for another user. Of course there was no election fraud in 2020. It's been over three years and not one of you dumbasses have provided any evidence of wrong doing. Move on, Goober!

You really should keep your anger under control. It's not healthy getting all upset over things like this.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17838) a year ago

They know deep down their shit ain't legit.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

No, he's suggesting the actual absurdity of the notion that the Democrats managed to rig the 2020 election. The amount of co-conspirators across the USA that it would take is beyond absurd.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16326) a year ago

"RIGHT?? YES or NO??"

If he said no would that put the matter to bed and everyone could relax in the knowledge it wasnt rigged?

reply

[–] tvfan (14567) a year ago

It was 100% rigged.

reply

[–] robocat893 (16257) a year ago

It's been over 3 years since Trump lost. If there was any evidence of a rigged election I think someone would come forward by now to tell the tale. I have no idea why you idiots are clinging onto the stolen election myth without any proof. That's the epitome of asininity!

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17838) a year ago

I highly doubt Michelle O'Bama wants anything to do with being president. She would have run by now.

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9443) a year ago

Don't be ridiculous.

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

Why is it ridiculous if I may ask?? When someone who's not often seen in the public eye comes out all of a sudden to the media and says "I lie awake at night terrified of how our country is going to become if Trump wins" and if that doesn't reek of someone basically saying "I'm running", I don't know what does dude?? I mean, you're liberal.. You should be tickled to death at this??

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Do you think this is the only interview that Michelle Obama has done in the last few years? You know, Tony Blair has made big interviews in the UK from time to time.

Does that mean he's about to remove Keir Starmer as Labour leader and come back?

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

If you honest to God, really don't believe this man or woman has an agenda by coming out saying "I lie in bed at night terrified of what the world will become under Donald Trump and a 2nd Term" and you don't think this means she's not throwing her hat in the race and replacing an old man who never should've been President to begin with?? How gullible are you??

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

By "agenda" do you mean "Michelle Obama is a Democrat, married to a former Democrat President and obviously doesn't like Trump".

What would you expect Michelle Obama to say?

>and you don't think this means she's not throwing her hat in the race and replacing an old man who never should've been President to begin with?? How gullible are you??

No more than any notable ex-politician or public figure of some kind doing an interview. As I asked: Tony Blair has made big interviews in the UK from time to time.

Does that mean he's about to remove Keir Starmer as Labour leader and come back?

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

You have got to be the dumbest fucking young, wet behind the ear liberal I've ever seen.. Now because of your trolling, you're on ignore now just like Robocat and his stupidity

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I think you've threatened this before. I'll ask again, since you didn't answer.

By "agenda" do you mean "Michelle Obama is a Democrat, married to a former Democrat President and obviously doesn't like Trump".

What would you expect Michelle Obama to say?

>and you don't think this means she's not throwing her hat in the race and replacing an old man who never should've been President to begin with?? How gullible are you??

No more than any notable ex-politician or public figure of some kind doing an interview. As I asked: Tony Blair has made big interviews in the UK from time to time.

Does that mean he's about to remove Keir Starmer as Labour leader and come back?

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9443) a year ago

Right, try linear logic on a loonie. Nothing better to do with your time?

reply

[–] Bubbathegut (18253) a year ago

Michael good be a decent president.

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

I think this is a done deal and this is how they get Trump out of the way before the Left & Liberals commit suicide over this man

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I can't imagine how many failed predictions you've probably made in the last 3 years.

If the Democrats were planning on dumping Biden, why on earth would they not have done it last year?

Also you continue to parrot absurd and nonsensical conspiracy theories.

reply

[–] SamNoyoun (6019) a year ago

God DAMN you people are dumb!

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

Practice what you preach and if you don't think this is going to happen, then I really don't know what to tell you because I don't like it either, but no one and I mean NO ONE who stays out of the media like she does, doesn't all of a sudden out of nowhere come forward claiming she loses sleep over Trump and how a 2nd Term would be without there being a motive or reason behind it.. She's running.. Get used to this and Trump will lose.. Isn't this what you want to hear Lib??

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

You are so wound up by media appearances its beyond comical.

reply

[–] coreydude (332) a year ago

Rather have Aunt Esther as prez.

reply

[–] Lige (357) a year ago

You fish-eyed fool!

reply

[–] coreydude (332) a year ago

And a heathen

reply

[–] Lige (357) a year ago

Watch it, sucka!

reply

[–] coreydude (332) a year ago

https://youtu.be/RQhiZpLJtcg?si=hjzDgNO6LgRPqM2d

reply

[–] Lige (357) a year ago

I'm old enough to remember that.

Esther didn't play.

reply

[–] Bloodworth79 (5739) a year ago

What her credentials for running?
Any past jobs?

reply

[–] BKB (11335) a year ago

One could make the argument of what's Trump's Qualifications to run for President in 2016(and I voted for him twice but still)??

reply

[–] Bloodworth79 (5739) a year ago

Developed multiple apartment buildings and commercial buildings.
Successful tv show that worked to raise a ton of charity money.

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) a year ago

"Developed multiple apartment buildings and commercial buildings."

So has every kid who's ever played a game of Monopoly! And just like monopoly players, Trump started the game with a huge stack of unearned cash.

"Successful tv show that worked to raise a ton of charity money."

In the reality TV show era, having your own show isn't much of a flex.