MovieChat Forums > Politics > so, what IS a workable solution for usa ...

so, what IS a workable solution for usa gun issue?


the governement's 100,000 employees can't seem to figure it out... maybe we can?

what can we do to reduce amurica's stupid mass shooting epidemic?
- can't restrict guns for our rights of owning to keep government from owning us
- can't make laws that are effective at all
- we need guns to protect from guns

maybe look into the root cause of people shooting groups and start there?
maybe society pressure is creating the issue, and not mental health, nor gun controls.

other ideas?

reply

The first issue that must be fixed the Family Unit, and good father's in the home. This is the first step in healing the mental health issues in this country.

Until Mental Health is addressed...any gun laws will never work, because the FBI and the Police do not do their jobs.

reply

Other countries have mentally ill people. They just don't let them buy mass killing machines

reply

And those people STILL go on mass killing sprees.

reply

At a rate that's like 1%of the US.

reply

We have a higher rate of criminals and mentally ill.

reply

Yeah, homicides don't actually go down in gun free nations, they just choose a different weapon to kill people with.

For the most part, people are just fucked up. We'll always find creative ways to kill each other, it's what mammals do. Addressing mental health issues could help but it won't stop every murder.

However, if the government decides to ban assault weapons, I won't lose any sleep over it. No one really "needs" to own one.

reply

However, if the government decides to ban assault weapons, I won't lose any sleep over it. No one really "needs" to own one.


You won't have to because there's no such thing as an "Assault Weapon".

And after a bunch of Hamas terrorists paraglided into another country and did some mass-killings.....owning a high-capacity rifle should be DUTY. An attack like that would be stopped in it's tracks.

reply

lol, yeap, they don't have a need for an AR until they need it and don't have one.

reply

>>there's no such thing as an "Assault Weapon<<

By assault weapon, I mean scary looking guns. lol...

That's what this is all about anyways, scary looking rifles. Either way, you don't "need" to own such a weapon.

And if a terror attack ever happens, there's usually nothing one can do about it. They're surprise attacks, that the victims are never prepared to deal with.

But in my opinion, I think it should be legal for everyone to carry a handgun or at the very least, a revolver. This way, everyone would have a fighting chance if a terror attack does happen. I mean, sure you would have the occasional gun fight that breaks out or the occasional gun accident but we already have these to be begin with. But this alone would be a real deterrent for people that are thinking of committing crimes.



reply

"scary looking rifles"

Nah, that is all in your head....you are referring to mentally ill persons.

Nothing scary about these:

https://i.postimg.cc/c4PGwx0y/Guns-1.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/K8LS568K/Guns-2.jpg

reply

Either way, you don't "need" to own such a weapon.


So wild animals don't exist? The social fabric of society could come crashing down at any moment...then what? How will you hunt for food? Your bare hands?

You'd be a sitting duck! If you wanna be a hungry, disarmed sitting duck, all the power to you dude... but the rest of us smart people are armed up.

And if a terror attack ever happens, there's usually nothing one can do about it.


Not with that attitude and no rifle.

I think it should be legal for everyone to carry a handgun or at the very least, a revolver.


Handguns are the shittiest, most inaccurate firearm at any distance beyond 15-20 yards unless you're a trained marksman. Commies want AR-15s banned because a trained marksman could literally pick off 30 targets in less than a few minutes, and will end the revolution before it even begins.

reply

You can hunt with a regular hunting rifle. You don't need a scary looking gun to hunt with.

Handguns are not as accurate but if a lot of people have one, no one is going to try to pull off a mass shooting, or at least it evens the odds if someone does try it.

Either way, I do think concealed handguns should be legal in every state.

reply

Not to the degree America has. Not even close...

I reject your strawman.

reply

I tend to agree 1000% with the family issue here... question is: can that be turned around? seems like everything works AGAINST a functional family these days... lawyers, money, envy, media....

this family failure does cause "mental issues" of lost, unloved, entitled, selfish messes of people. seems like the fbi, police, government doesn't have any real idea how to fix this. just how to yell about it and maybe bandaid the back end rather than face the front end.

reply

can that be turned around?


Not until the public at large is ready to hear the very uncomfortable truth, instead of the comforting lies they have been living in for over 100 years...

reply

cause no mass shooter came from a family or had a good father.

republicans all of a sudden want socialist spending in healthcare to help the massive mental health issue? isnt that communism!

Until Mental Health is addressed...any gun laws will never work, because the FBI and the Police do not do their jobs.


all other developed countries in the world are also seeing a surge in mental health issue. they also have similar comprehensive gun control. funny how their gun laws all work?

reply

I don't fucking care about other countries....they are not the USA. They do not matter.

Go move to them, if you think they are so great.

reply

because it proves you are wrong and that family or even mental health is not the most significant variable, easy access to guns and ammunitions is, including extended magazines and a lack of safeguards in place that might trigger police interest and stop it ever happening. don't get triggered snowflake facts don't care about feelings:)

reply

don't get triggered snowflake facts don't care about feelings

Why would anyone be triggered by your dumbassery?

Oh, you were parodying!

reply

You are one of the biggest most tender snowflakes here. Every time I ask you for evidence that the 2020 election was stolen you cry and run away.

reply

https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/653eea6fa7f48457c57f521e/Is-Anti-Zionism-Anti-Semitism?reply=65480b63ebc51c64414d2d5f

from TV fan

"And yet, you insist begging for proof; it doesn’t get more imbecilic than that."

he has to be a troll? this is short bus levels of stupidity.

reply

you ran after you said " And yet, you insist begging for proof; it doesn’t get more imbecilic than that."

now the weasels back again!

reply

But I didn't beg you for any proof. You and the other dumbass are.

reply

yes we ask for proof when you make assertions or arguments. if that confuses you you way want to get your head checked? "trust me bro" isnt good enough short bus.

ill show you why

"Trump and his whole circles are pedos. oh you want proof? i dont have to provide it! stop begging me for proof! dumbass!"

go back to school. normally id suggest redoing highschool but at your level you need to start at the very beginning sweety.

reply

You are constantly begging for proof because you are too imbecilic to do your own research and you want others to spoon feed you like a little child having tantrums for proof.

Anymore clowning?

reply

"Burden of proof means that if you make a claim, you are the one required to provide evidence. Nobody needs to provide proof that you're wrong, if you don't provide proof that you're right. "

https://shanesnow.com/research/master-burden-of-proof-for-smarter-business-decision-making#:~:text=Burden%20of%20proof%20means%20that,proof%20that%20you%27re%20right.



"The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove."

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof


"The burden of proof (“onus probandi” in Latin) is the obligation to provide sufficient supporting evidence for claims that you make"

https://effectiviology.com/burden-of-proof/


you all about that shortbus life huh?

reply

Nobody needs to provide proof that you're wrong

It is called "confirming or verifying", lol.

reply

1. proving you are wrong and "confirming you are right" are two separate things dumbass. is like the difference between proving you are guilty or failing to prove you are innocent. it was 8 words (Nobody needs to provide proof that you're wrong), and you couldnt even understand them

2 i cant confirm what you havent provided proof for, short bus. its not my job. its your to provide proof. which i will then look into and confirm and verify. you havent provided a shred of evidence for me to confirm or verify. you made claims. you didnt give evidence. as all these sites confirm you dont understand this simple concept. you need to hand back your highschool diploma. they failed you.

reply

You imbecile, thanks for stating the obvious which doesn't negate my point.

reply

it completely, utterly and irrefutably does.


you cant even dispute it its why you bascially wrote "nah uh". how could i be "stating the obvious" if i had to show where your point was wrong? that means you are saying i am obviously right. you are so lost in your BS you dont even know what you are arguing anymore

3/3 now. its like slapping around a small weak child with you :) dont forget your helmet when you leave the house tvfan. you got utterly bodied here.

reply

There have been other clowns like you and there will be more.

reply

which has nothing to do with anything relating to providing evidence of the burden of proof or this topic. You are so desperate to avoid it you are incoherently rambling!

reply

No dumbass, I'm just not taking you seriously because you are just another clown🤡 clowning.

reply

Until you provide proof of your claims here nobody will ever take you seriously.

reply

Nothing about your post is remotely true.

If you go to a gun store today, you WILL NOT walk out of the store with one. I guarantee you this.

However, if you go to a therapist today, you probably WILL walk out with psych meds that can fuck up your brain to the point of committing a mass shooting...

reply

What about that Norway guy? Or the Paris attacks? What did those comprehensive gun control laws do there?

reply

Those situations were bad, but notable in how seriously rare they are in Europe.

reply

the norway dude was 2011 that was 12 years ago. when was the US's last mass shooting? a week ago?

https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting?sort=desc&order=Victims%20Killed

this is just 2023 alone i listed 5 but the list goes on and on and on and on

Lewiston Maine -oct 25 - 18 dead
Monterey Park california - jan 21st - 11 dead
allen texas - may 6th - 8 dead
Half moon Bya California - jan 23. - 7 dead
Cedar City Utah - jan 4th - 7 dead

Now lets compare that with Canada

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_Canada

which has had 10 incidents of mass shootings of over 5 people dead from 2001-2023. while America has had 14 mass shootings of over 5 people dead just in 2023 alone. the numbers are even worse in comparison to Canada if you count incidents of only 4 or 3 shot as "mass shootings".

There you go. absolute irrefutable evidence that gun control works to reduce mass shootings.

i do like how you thought you made a point that was adorable

reply

Why did the gun control fail in the instances I mentioned? That was my question sugar-tits.

reply

it didnt fail. Do you understand how reality works? like even the slightest? no system is 100% perfect. especially something as complex as this. What it perfectly demonstrates in that the Canadian framework surrounding gun regulations is vastly vastly better and more effective than the US one at preventing mass shooting. its not even a comparison.

again i do like how you thought you made a point that was adorable

reply

It did fail, 130 people were killed. It happened several times in France, that's just the one I have off the top of my head. I'm not researching Canada tonight no matter how much you bring it up, different demographics and diving into how they report or dont report their crime statistics is a mess. You are getting pissy because I poked a hole in your narrative. It's ok, get on YouTube and type in kittens, you will feel better.

reply

you didnt poke any hole in any narrative.

you were proven wrong, and all you can point to is extreme rare one offs. vs constantly mass shootings in the US every single week. :)

how adorable that you are struggling so hard here

reply

your simple mind cant understand things outside black and white dichotomies. goodluck with your low functioning mind!

you didnt poke holes in anything., you didnt even TOUCH my Canada vs US numbers. go cry and pretend you won snowflake.

reply

Don't ever use that narrative as a parachute, because its got holes poked allll through it.

reply

i completely destroyed you with the Canada vs US numbers.

you sure did dodge that like the flu and wouldnt even touch it huh?

https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/mass-shootings-by-country/

Number of mass shootings
1 United States of America 101
2 Russia 21
3 France 8



https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/954503

"Over 70% of mass shootings in developed countries happen in the US, international analysis shows"


your concession is noted.

reply

Another Canuck? or are you the same idiot sock as the last one?

Just like the previous sock where you are always begging and bitching about proof, you cry when others stop replying, and deflect with juvenile competitiveness, lol. The same dumbassery.

What happened, did you get sad and lonely in your echo chamber?

reply

so all that whining and crying and complaining.

all just to avoid

1. admitting you have no evidence
2. admitting you dont understand the burden of proof.

you will do anything to avoid owning up to anything wont you :) that would take being a strong individual. while you are the biggest snowflake on here.

reply

And yet, you completely deflected and avoided answering my question about you been a sock for your previous account, don't be such a little girl, own up to it.

reply

me deflecting? you are doing it this minute, nice try though

don't be such a little girl, own up to it.


the irony of this while you constantly bitch out from every topic you engage in, and turn them into rants about "leftists" when you lose. EVeryone on this site sees that and knows that about you.

reply

Something happening 12 years ago doesn't invalidate it happening... if that were the case, no one would be bitching about American Slavery that happened 200 years ago...but they still do!

reply

Get our leaders to stop glorifying guns and gun culture. Like those pictures of the whole family posing in their matching Christmas PJs all holding guns. They have built a culture that looks at guns a the solution to all their problems.

reply

i think we are reaping what we sowed here.... created a free nation, allowed people to arm themselves to keep government at bay - part of why america was founded - then kept the gun defense thing going all these years. now its a profitable business, and then our social pressures pop out the nut jobs who go on a rampage before offing themselves.

the most popular games online are shooters (I still play them all) and desensitising children to murder like that doesn't help the issue.

reply

Is funny saying that out right to own guns is to keep the government at bay. When the second amendment was debated the reasons were for protecting the country from invasion and insurrection. And the federal government is what created our domestic gun industry.

reply

Yes, to shield citizens from an overreaching government, like the one that pushed and mandated a poisonous vaccine to millions that are now dead or injured because of it and that you continue to deny.

Btw, the real insurrection occurred on Nov the 3rd 2020 when they overthrew the government and duly elected POTUS.

reply

Doesn't solve the problem.

Criminals(usually created by single mothers due to the failure of the family unit) do not care about laws.

Just admit you hate conservatives, want them to die, and be done with it.

reply

The post you are responding to didn't mention criminals or laws.

reply

"glorifying guns and gun culture"

The ones that do this the most are gangster rappers....criminals.

reply

Republican legislators do this, and they are supposed to be leaders in their community. Why don't you hold them to the same standards you demand of hip hop singers?

reply

It's a response to gun grabbers. Those families in jammies with guns aren't a problem.

reply

there are solutions that over literal decades would have a massive affect.

But the US is too fractured politically no republican would ever allow this. One single state could ruin it for the rest of the states, a single administration and lazy enforcement could destroy any progress made or enough judges could entirely undermine even the best legislation

republicans would magically have to start caring more about dead kids than minor common sense restrictions on guns. they apparently will never do that so.

reply

im not on either side, but what does one do, when your best defense against other's guns is your guns? I really don't know how to answer that.

other than obviously yes, assult weapons should OBVIOUSLY be a lot more restricted. hell, they put a speed governer on my freaking motorcycle. I would think spraying crowds with bullets should be something to govern also.

reply

same. theyve let it get so bad everyone feels they need somehting or they are behind on the "arms race" because they are so prevelant and you never know whose packing heat. A feeling i have literally never felt in my life

yaaa clearly those need to be controlled. i jsut find it funny when republicans say "the second is unrestrictable! its an unalienable right and even says "shall not be infringed"!" but bring up RPGs or bazookas and they are like "well ya of course we need those restrictions". then you try and apply that logic to other stuff and they say "no its inalienable!"

reply

This is not a partisan issue. You just hate conservatives, it pretty obvious at this point.

reply

it is undoubtaly a partisan issue. republicans wont break ranks on guns cause their gun nut voters wont let them itd be their political end. you didnt know what cope meant now you dont know what partisan means. jog on.

reply

Almost 1/4 of all deaths in America, every day, are abortions. Don't play the "care about kids" card with tribal politics.

reply

a fetus is not a kid. you thought you had a zinger there didnt you?

reply

It's a human life, if you know anything about biology. Regardless, don't pretend to care about children as a political card.

reply

i didnt say it wasnt human or a life.

i said it wasnt a kid. which it isnt.

it also isnt a child.

have you seen a human fetus at 2 months? where does it begin?? 2 weeks? 2 days? an unrecognizable clump of cells is a kid just like an 8 year old?

reply

Such a pity that your parents didn't have the same attitude as you when they conceived you.

reply

I'm sure your mother/sister feels the same way about you.

reply

the weasal came out of hiding

reply

That is what your daddy said when you crawled out of your mother's uterus.

reply

wouldnt i crawl out? you cant even form coherent insults. you always fail at everything

reply

An 8-year-old is a clump of cells, so are you. An 8-year-old is a human, so is a fetus, the jury is out on you (j/k).

reply

Easy = stop having kids = problems solved

Sadly the right don't like that, they want to you keep having kids no matter your income level so we can shit more crazy low educated folk. As Jon Stewart once said, the right loves CHAOS.


https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/no-criminal-charges-against-texas-man-who-shot-and-killed-girlfriends-ex-husband-during-front-porch-custody-fight/

Texas self defense statute permits you to shoot someone in the back--twice!--while they're running away and have ceased to be a threat in a situation that you both escalated and chose to extend.

So Texas's self defense statute is as much about revenge for offending hillbilly sensibilities as self defense. This petty, well connected person was offended and gleefully murdered another person because he believed his privilege would cover any gap in the law. And he was right. Look how long Paxton slow walked the grand jury to keep his victim's family from cleaning him out financially.

Undoubtedly all his assets were "mysteriously lost" or gifted to family members in the months since the murder.


I personally don't want gun control in the US because of all the death and entertainment that comes out of the stupidity of it all. US provides the best entertainment for carnage while not being in a war with any great nation. Middle East is also another.

reply

Worst take ever.

You know what's fun to watch? The UK slowly becoming 3 world Muslim shithole. And it's gonna be completed wayyyyy faster than here!

reply

6% of the population of the UK is muslim

reply

Too many already....once the population hits 10%, it's ovah!

This is fact. Only 4% left to go, and it will happen within this decade.

reply

>Too many already....once the population hits 10%, it's ovah!

18% of Israel is Muslim. Is it "over" for them?

And on what basis is it over if its 10% exactly?

reply

18% of Israel is Muslim. Is it "over" for them?


Last I checked it's not going to so well currently... every day, more and more seem to be siding with Palestine. Not to mention the fact that they need the "Iron Curtain" just to simply exist... Yeah, it probably is over for them.

And on what basis is it over if its 10% exactly?


Documented history. The Middle East used to be majority Christian.

reply

>Last I checked it's not going to so well currently... every day, more and more seem to be siding with Palestine. Not to mention the fact that they need the "Iron Curtain" just to simply exist... Yeah, it probably is over for them.

More and more where? Within Israel or in Gaza or the West Bank?

>Documented history. The Middle East used to be majority Christian.

This is just a claim. Provide actual evidence that "10% of the population being Muslim" was some kind of tipping-point. And tipping-point to what, exactly?

reply

Provide actual evidence

Cope and Seethe.

reply

This is pretty low-effort mimicry. I continue to wait for the OP to clarify their position or provide evidence.

reply

I could find over a dozen of your requests for evidence/citations that went unanswered by others on this forum, so you may have to wait, cope and seethe without it.

reply

Yes, a lot of you refuse to back up absurd claims made. That's not going to stop me asking for them.

reply

Get ignorant European noses out of it, tell them to quit watching our lying news and believing every word they tell, tell them to read a fucking history book behind why we have a second amendment to start with, have them look into what dictatorial governments do when they take over, and force the American press to include stories about how someone responsible with a gun stopped a gun massacre more often than unarmed Americans in gun-free zones could.

reply

I've thought about that in media... that's the thing.... do you WANT to know about shootings, or do you NOT want to know about shootings?
Maybe the media could stop making them go global viral, there be less incentive? Bad things happen on a local level here in my location all the time that don't need splashed across the whole usa. Is local. Leave it local. But media is after clicks and headlines. USA....
And yes please love to hear about attempts thwarted by armed people. That would make the news actually helpful for this situation.

reply

You need to understand something about the American press:

They aren't there to inform you. They are there to sell a narrative, get your attention, sway your opinion, and to entertain you, and they are firmly biased towards anything that is American liberalism. They've been that way from the beginning, and they have only gotten worse since then. Their job is not to tell you the truth (the European press is just as bad). One thing American liberals don't like are guns (a layover from when their ancestors were loyalists to King George III), and the news is always reporting on mass shootings (some of which are staged by the FBI or CIA to lie to the public).

They're trying to sell a story that American civilians (besides cops and security guards) are not responsible enough to be left alone with guns. They make us all sound crazy and that we shouldn't be trusted with firearms, and that we have so many shootings that your average schoolchild spends at least one day a week dodging bullets. While that may be true in places like Chicago or Columbia, it's as far from the truth as you can get.

It would ruin the story they were selling if people found out that most Americans who own firearms have actually been very responsible with them, observed the laws, did not use them except within specific situations (such as hunting or defense), and even protected others they saw were in danger from a nutjob who probably got their gun illegally. I've met a few gun-owners, and none of them were trigger-happy loonies. I also spent my entire school career, never even seeing a gun except in a few movies brought in to entertain the kids, or on the belt of a police officer teaching us why we shouldn't be abusing drugs.

The biggest thing that busts the myth of the irresponsible American gun owner, are people who legally owned guns who stopped a nutjob from hurting others. There are actually more of them then there are shootings, but you have to search really hard to find any articles written about them.

It should also be noted that a large number of gun deaths in the US are not actually due to murdering another person. Over half of them are suicides, usually older adults. But the American Press and their masters wouldn't want you to know that either.

The press also magnifies the story, exaggerates how many were killed, and drags the story out for months to make it seem like it happened far longer than it actually did, and they keep the part about the shooter getting stopped to a very minimum. It's one of many ways they distract the public from our real problems.

From what I've heard, they lie about guns just as much over in Europe. They hate guns over there even more than our liberals do here, and love to say "Oh gun deaths are down by a lot now that we disarmed the populace!" without mentioning that those same people who would have used a gun here in the US just kill using other weapons, like knives, poison, improvised weapons from farms, and even sharpened shovels; so the death rates aren't lower, just different overseas.

reply

In 2013 Obama repealed the propaganda ban making it legal for the US to propagandize its citizens.

Prior to the ban, the CIA had infiltrated the media for decades by having them spread just enough crumbs of false info to the masses. aka CIA Project Mockingbird or Operation Mockingbird.

Because of this ban lift, in 2020 during the covid, the government weaponized the media against its own citizens as the greatest psyop fear campaign in human history.

reply

Gee, Obama's breaking open a lot of safeguards, isn't he? Just one more reason I wouldn't cry if someone assassinated his sorry ass.

reply

Liberals can invent a scientific way to test people for psychopathy and then make it so all people who want to own guns have to be tested for psychopathy.

reply

*Democrats* not Liberals.
Liberalism is an ideology of inclusiveness and individuality on which America was founded. Capitalism, individual rights, and democracy are products of liberalism. American Fascists used/use liberal as a slur.

Democrats have no interest in mental health, they want to take away guns because disarmed societies lose freedom of speech next.

reply

What is the majorty of gun violence from?
Unregistered and ghost guns.

Yes many shooting happen through legal weapons.

But the illegal gun violence out weights the legal by far.

So make a law that anyone caught with a illegal weapon will do mandatory long time.
Especially if they have a criminal record.




reply

We don't have a gun problem we have a Democrat problem.

Uvalde: Democrat
Buffalo: Democrat
Boulder: Democrat
Orlando: Democrat
Parkland: Democrat
Nashville: Democrat
Las Vegas: Democrat
Sandy Hook: Democrat
San Bernardino Democrat
Midland/Odessa: Democrat
Colorado Springs: Democrat
Powys Synagogue: Democrat
Tree of Life Synagogue: Democrat

Lewiston: Democrat

reply