the governement's 100,000 employees can't seem to figure it out... maybe we can?
what can we do to reduce amurica's stupid mass shooting epidemic?
- can't restrict guns for our rights of owning to keep government from owning us
- can't make laws that are effective at all
- we need guns to protect from guns
maybe look into the root cause of people shooting groups and start there?
maybe society pressure is creating the issue, and not mental health, nor gun controls.
The first issue that must be fixed the Family Unit, and good father's in the home. This is the first step in healing the mental health issues in this country.
Until Mental Health is addressed...any gun laws will never work, because the FBI and the Police do not do their jobs.
Yeah, homicides don't actually go down in gun free nations, they just choose a different weapon to kill people with.
For the most part, people are just fucked up. We'll always find creative ways to kill each other, it's what mammals do. Addressing mental health issues could help but it won't stop every murder.
However, if the government decides to ban assault weapons, I won't lose any sleep over it. No one really "needs" to own one.
However, if the government decides to ban assault weapons, I won't lose any sleep over it. No one really "needs" to own one.
You won't have to because there's no such thing as an "Assault Weapon".
And after a bunch of Hamas terrorists paraglided into another country and did some mass-killings.....owning a high-capacity rifle should be DUTY. An attack like that would be stopped in it's tracks.
reply share
By assault weapon, I mean scary looking guns. lol...
That's what this is all about anyways, scary looking rifles. Either way, you don't "need" to own such a weapon.
And if a terror attack ever happens, there's usually nothing one can do about it. They're surprise attacks, that the victims are never prepared to deal with.
But in my opinion, I think it should be legal for everyone to carry a handgun or at the very least, a revolver. This way, everyone would have a fighting chance if a terror attack does happen. I mean, sure you would have the occasional gun fight that breaks out or the occasional gun accident but we already have these to be begin with. But this alone would be a real deterrent for people that are thinking of committing crimes.
Either way, you don't "need" to own such a weapon.
So wild animals don't exist? The social fabric of society could come crashing down at any moment...then what? How will you hunt for food? Your bare hands?
You'd be a sitting duck! If you wanna be a hungry, disarmed sitting duck, all the power to you dude... but the rest of us smart people are armed up.
And if a terror attack ever happens, there's usually nothing one can do about it.
Not with that attitude and no rifle.
I think it should be legal for everyone to carry a handgun or at the very least, a revolver.
Handguns are the shittiest, most inaccurate firearm at any distance beyond 15-20 yards unless you're a trained marksman. Commies want AR-15s banned because a trained marksman could literally pick off 30 targets in less than a few minutes, and will end the revolution before it even begins.
reply share
You can hunt with a regular hunting rifle. You don't need a scary looking gun to hunt with.
Handguns are not as accurate but if a lot of people have one, no one is going to try to pull off a mass shooting, or at least it evens the odds if someone does try it.
Either way, I do think concealed handguns should be legal in every state.
I tend to agree 1000% with the family issue here... question is: can that be turned around? seems like everything works AGAINST a functional family these days... lawyers, money, envy, media....
this family failure does cause "mental issues" of lost, unloved, entitled, selfish messes of people. seems like the fbi, police, government doesn't have any real idea how to fix this. just how to yell about it and maybe bandaid the back end rather than face the front end.
Not until the public at large is ready to hear the very uncomfortable truth, instead of the comforting lies they have been living in for over 100 years...
reply share
cause no mass shooter came from a family or had a good father.
republicans all of a sudden want socialist spending in healthcare to help the massive mental health issue? isnt that communism!
Until Mental Health is addressed...any gun laws will never work, because the FBI and the Police do not do their jobs.
all other developed countries in the world are also seeing a surge in mental health issue. they also have similar comprehensive gun control. funny how their gun laws all work?
reply share
because it proves you are wrong and that family or even mental health is not the most significant variable, easy access to guns and ammunitions is, including extended magazines and a lack of safeguards in place that might trigger police interest and stop it ever happening. don't get triggered snowflake facts don't care about feelings:)
yes we ask for proof when you make assertions or arguments. if that confuses you you way want to get your head checked? "trust me bro" isnt good enough short bus.
ill show you why
"Trump and his whole circles are pedos. oh you want proof? i dont have to provide it! stop begging me for proof! dumbass!"
go back to school. normally id suggest redoing highschool but at your level you need to start at the very beginning sweety.
You are constantly begging for proof because you are too imbecilic to do your own research and you want others to spoon feed you like a little child having tantrums for proof.
"Burden of proof means that if you make a claim, you are the one required to provide evidence. Nobody needs to provide proof that you're wrong, if you don't provide proof that you're right. "
1. proving you are wrong and "confirming you are right" are two separate things dumbass. is like the difference between proving you are guilty or failing to prove you are innocent. it was 8 words (Nobody needs to provide proof that you're wrong), and you couldnt even understand them
2 i cant confirm what you havent provided proof for, short bus. its not my job. its your to provide proof. which i will then look into and confirm and verify. you havent provided a shred of evidence for me to confirm or verify. you made claims. you didnt give evidence. as all these sites confirm you dont understand this simple concept. you need to hand back your highschool diploma. they failed you.
you cant even dispute it its why you bascially wrote "nah uh". how could i be "stating the obvious" if i had to show where your point was wrong? that means you are saying i am obviously right. you are so lost in your BS you dont even know what you are arguing anymore
3/3 now. its like slapping around a small weak child with you :) dont forget your helmet when you leave the house tvfan. you got utterly bodied here.
which has nothing to do with anything relating to providing evidence of the burden of proof or this topic. You are so desperate to avoid it you are incoherently rambling!
If you go to a gun store today, you WILL NOT walk out of the store with one. I guarantee you this.
However, if you go to a therapist today, you probably WILL walk out with psych meds that can fuck up your brain to the point of committing a mass shooting...
this is just 2023 alone i listed 5 but the list goes on and on and on and on
Lewiston Maine -oct 25 - 18 dead
Monterey Park california - jan 21st - 11 dead
allen texas - may 6th - 8 dead
Half moon Bya California - jan 23. - 7 dead
Cedar City Utah - jan 4th - 7 dead
which has had 10 incidents of mass shootings of over 5 people dead from 2001-2023. while America has had 14 mass shootings of over 5 people dead just in 2023 alone. the numbers are even worse in comparison to Canada if you count incidents of only 4 or 3 shot as "mass shootings".
There you go. absolute irrefutable evidence that gun control works to reduce mass shootings.
i do like how you thought you made a point that was adorable
it didnt fail. Do you understand how reality works? like even the slightest? no system is 100% perfect. especially something as complex as this. What it perfectly demonstrates in that the Canadian framework surrounding gun regulations is vastly vastly better and more effective than the US one at preventing mass shooting. its not even a comparison.
again i do like how you thought you made a point that was adorable
It did fail, 130 people were killed. It happened several times in France, that's just the one I have off the top of my head. I'm not researching Canada tonight no matter how much you bring it up, different demographics and diving into how they report or dont report their crime statistics is a mess. You are getting pissy because I poked a hole in your narrative. It's ok, get on YouTube and type in kittens, you will feel better.
Another Canuck? or are you the same idiot sock as the last one?
Just like the previous sock where you are always begging and bitching about proof, you cry when others stop replying, and deflect with juvenile competitiveness, lol. The same dumbassery.
What happened, did you get sad and lonely in your echo chamber?
1. admitting you have no evidence
2. admitting you dont understand the burden of proof.
you will do anything to avoid owning up to anything wont you :) that would take being a strong individual. while you are the biggest snowflake on here.
And yet, you completely deflected and avoided answering my question about you been a sock for your previous account, don't be such a little girl, own up to it.
me deflecting? you are doing it this minute, nice try though
don't be such a little girl, own up to it.
the irony of this while you constantly bitch out from every topic you engage in, and turn them into rants about "leftists" when you lose. EVeryone on this site sees that and knows that about you.
Something happening 12 years ago doesn't invalidate it happening... if that were the case, no one would be bitching about American Slavery that happened 200 years ago...but they still do!
Get our leaders to stop glorifying guns and gun culture. Like those pictures of the whole family posing in their matching Christmas PJs all holding guns. They have built a culture that looks at guns a the solution to all their problems.
i think we are reaping what we sowed here.... created a free nation, allowed people to arm themselves to keep government at bay - part of why america was founded - then kept the gun defense thing going all these years. now its a profitable business, and then our social pressures pop out the nut jobs who go on a rampage before offing themselves.
the most popular games online are shooters (I still play them all) and desensitising children to murder like that doesn't help the issue.
Is funny saying that out right to own guns is to keep the government at bay. When the second amendment was debated the reasons were for protecting the country from invasion and insurrection. And the federal government is what created our domestic gun industry.
Yes, to shield citizens from an overreaching government, like the one that pushed and mandated a poisonous vaccine to millions that are now dead or injured because of it and that you continue to deny.
Btw, the real insurrection occurred on Nov the 3rd 2020 when they overthrew the government and duly elected POTUS.
Republican legislators do this, and they are supposed to be leaders in their community. Why don't you hold them to the same standards you demand of hip hop singers?
there are solutions that over literal decades would have a massive affect.
But the US is too fractured politically no republican would ever allow this. One single state could ruin it for the rest of the states, a single administration and lazy enforcement could destroy any progress made or enough judges could entirely undermine even the best legislation
republicans would magically have to start caring more about dead kids than minor common sense restrictions on guns. they apparently will never do that so.
im not on either side, but what does one do, when your best defense against other's guns is your guns? I really don't know how to answer that.
other than obviously yes, assult weapons should OBVIOUSLY be a lot more restricted. hell, they put a speed governer on my freaking motorcycle. I would think spraying crowds with bullets should be something to govern also.
same. theyve let it get so bad everyone feels they need somehting or they are behind on the "arms race" because they are so prevelant and you never know whose packing heat. A feeling i have literally never felt in my life
yaaa clearly those need to be controlled. i jsut find it funny when republicans say "the second is unrestrictable! its an unalienable right and even says "shall not be infringed"!" but bring up RPGs or bazookas and they are like "well ya of course we need those restrictions". then you try and apply that logic to other stuff and they say "no its inalienable!"
it is undoubtaly a partisan issue. republicans wont break ranks on guns cause their gun nut voters wont let them itd be their political end. you didnt know what cope meant now you dont know what partisan means. jog on.
Sadly the right don't like that, they want to you keep having kids no matter your income level so we can shit more crazy low educated folk. As Jon Stewart once said, the right loves CHAOS.
Texas self defense statute permits you to shoot someone in the back--twice!--while they're running away and have ceased to be a threat in a situation that you both escalated and chose to extend.
So Texas's self defense statute is as much about revenge for offending hillbilly sensibilities as self defense. This petty, well connected person was offended and gleefully murdered another person because he believed his privilege would cover any gap in the law. And he was right. Look how long Paxton slow walked the grand jury to keep his victim's family from cleaning him out financially.
Undoubtedly all his assets were "mysteriously lost" or gifted to family members in the months since the murder.
I personally don't want gun control in the US because of all the death and entertainment that comes out of the stupidity of it all. US provides the best entertainment for carnage while not being in a war with any great nation. Middle East is also another.
Last I checked it's not going to so well currently... every day, more and more seem to be siding with Palestine. Not to mention the fact that they need the "Iron Curtain" just to simply exist... Yeah, it probably is over for them.
And on what basis is it over if its 10% exactly?
Documented history. The Middle East used to be majority Christian.
reply share
>Last I checked it's not going to so well currently... every day, more and more seem to be siding with Palestine. Not to mention the fact that they need the "Iron Curtain" just to simply exist... Yeah, it probably is over for them.
More and more where? Within Israel or in Gaza or the West Bank?
>Documented history. The Middle East used to be majority Christian.
This is just a claim. Provide actual evidence that "10% of the population being Muslim" was some kind of tipping-point. And tipping-point to what, exactly?
I could find over a dozen of your requests for evidence/citations that went unanswered by others on this forum, so you may have to wait, cope and seethe without it.
Get ignorant European noses out of it, tell them to quit watching our lying news and believing every word they tell, tell them to read a fucking history book behind why we have a second amendment to start with, have them look into what dictatorial governments do when they take over, and force the American press to include stories about how someone responsible with a gun stopped a gun massacre more often than unarmed Americans in gun-free zones could.
I've thought about that in media... that's the thing.... do you WANT to know about shootings, or do you NOT want to know about shootings?
Maybe the media could stop making them go global viral, there be less incentive? Bad things happen on a local level here in my location all the time that don't need splashed across the whole usa. Is local. Leave it local. But media is after clicks and headlines. USA....
And yes please love to hear about attempts thwarted by armed people. That would make the news actually helpful for this situation.
You need to understand something about the American press:
They aren't there to inform you. They are there to sell a narrative, get your attention, sway your opinion, and to entertain you, and they are firmly biased towards anything that is American liberalism. They've been that way from the beginning, and they have only gotten worse since then. Their job is not to tell you the truth (the European press is just as bad). One thing American liberals don't like are guns (a layover from when their ancestors were loyalists to King George III), and the news is always reporting on mass shootings (some of which are staged by the FBI or CIA to lie to the public).
They're trying to sell a story that American civilians (besides cops and security guards) are not responsible enough to be left alone with guns. They make us all sound crazy and that we shouldn't be trusted with firearms, and that we have so many shootings that your average schoolchild spends at least one day a week dodging bullets. While that may be true in places like Chicago or Columbia, it's as far from the truth as you can get.
It would ruin the story they were selling if people found out that most Americans who own firearms have actually been very responsible with them, observed the laws, did not use them except within specific situations (such as hunting or defense), and even protected others they saw were in danger from a nutjob who probably got their gun illegally. I've met a few gun-owners, and none of them were trigger-happy loonies. I also spent my entire school career, never even seeing a gun except in a few movies brought in to entertain the kids, or on the belt of a police officer teaching us why we shouldn't be abusing drugs.
The biggest thing that busts the myth of the irresponsible American gun owner, are people who legally owned guns who stopped a nutjob from hurting others. There are actually more of them then there are shootings, but you have to search really hard to find any articles written about them.
It should also be noted that a large number of gun deaths in the US are not actually due to murdering another person. Over half of them are suicides, usually older adults. But the American Press and their masters wouldn't want you to know that either.
The press also magnifies the story, exaggerates how many were killed, and drags the story out for months to make it seem like it happened far longer than it actually did, and they keep the part about the shooter getting stopped to a very minimum. It's one of many ways they distract the public from our real problems.
From what I've heard, they lie about guns just as much over in Europe. They hate guns over there even more than our liberals do here, and love to say "Oh gun deaths are down by a lot now that we disarmed the populace!" without mentioning that those same people who would have used a gun here in the US just kill using other weapons, like knives, poison, improvised weapons from farms, and even sharpened shovels; so the death rates aren't lower, just different overseas.
In 2013 Obama repealed the propaganda ban making it legal for the US to propagandize its citizens.
Prior to the ban, the CIA had infiltrated the media for decades by having them spread just enough crumbs of false info to the masses. aka CIA Project Mockingbird or Operation Mockingbird.
Because of this ban lift, in 2020 during the covid, the government weaponized the media against its own citizens as the greatest psyop fear campaign in human history.
Liberals can invent a scientific way to test people for psychopathy and then make it so all people who want to own guns have to be tested for psychopathy.
*Democrats* not Liberals.
Liberalism is an ideology of inclusiveness and individuality on which America was founded. Capitalism, individual rights, and democracy are products of liberalism. American Fascists used/use liberal as a slur.
Democrats have no interest in mental health, they want to take away guns because disarmed societies lose freedom of speech next.