Every right-wing accusation is a confession. - Politics Discussion

[–] [deleted] a year ago

the wannable intelectuals version of "i know you are, but what am i?"

well done genius.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

It's "intellectuals".

"Well done genius" indeed. - Eyeroll -

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11747) a year ago

Such an “abundance of examples” the dipshit OP didn’t name one. Lol!!!

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

On the contrary, I've pointed out all of the examples the right-wingers here have provided. ; )

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) a year ago

I'm on your side
but I havent seen you do that to be fair .
just read 3 pages of complete shitshow

[deleted] was right with "i know you are, but what am i?"

how about you edit this list of examples into your OP so its easy to find?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Do your own "research".

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

What world do you live in? It's literally the opposite.

Clinton accused Trump of Russian collusion to "hack" an election that didn't not even use electronics, as she stole a primary, and colluded with the media to fix the debates. Then creates an entire story line that gets her attorney locked up for starting the lie to bog down the Trump presidency.

Then there's V for Vendetta. The far right political party is a literal playbook on what the democrats did with COVID.

The left always pretend to be the peace keepers but all they do is instigate and start wars.

The left pretends to be inclusive and the party for blacks, but they treat them all like puppets and pawns and do everything to keep them in their station/position in life and never fix any of black neighborhood/city. They just appoint diversity hires for woke points/easy votes from the stupid people they claim are just as good as you and I.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

The real, objective world, unlike you obviously.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>Clinton accused Trump of Russian collusion to "hack" an election that didn't not even use electronics, as she stole a primary, and colluded with the media to fix the debates. Then creates an entire story line that gets her attorney locked up for starting the lie to bog down the Trump presidency.

How do you "fix a debate"? How did she steal the primary?

>Then there's V for Vendetta. The far right political party is a literal playbook on what the democrats did with COVID.

What did the Democrats do with COVID?

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

Clinton was pre-fed questions for the debates. Trump wasn't.
She stole the primaries by deleting thousands of new registered voters who wanted to vote for Bernie. That was NY. In Colorado they made new voters wait for hours, over 10, to vote. All of this was posted on youtube by angry people and memory holed by the media, per usual.

Watch the movie. Fauci created the gain of function to make the virus spread to humans, to cause widespread panic, and people give up any rights and power for safety and a cure. The democrats were willing to murder people by sending seniors back to assisted living homes or just killing them by ripping their lungs to shreds with ventilators just to make COVID seem more deadly than it was.

Here's Rand Paul discussing how Fauci lied and it needed a whistleblower to finally get the truth - https://youtu.be/cw4KsQGiPpI?si=FAewLFbSh07L0yLz

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>Clinton was pre-fed questions for the debates. Trump wasn't.

Source

>She stole the primaries by deleting thousands of new registered voters who wanted to vote for Bernie. That was NY. In Colorado they made new voters wait for hours, over 10, to vote. All of this was posted on youtube by angry people and memory holed by the media, per usual.

Evidence please

>Watch the movie. Fauci created the gain of function to make the virus spread to humans, to cause widespread panic, and people give up any rights and power for safety and a cure. The democrats were willing to murder people by sending seniors back to assisted living homes or just killing them by ripping their lungs to shreds with ventilators just to make COVID seem more deadly than it was.

Evidence please

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Dude. When he posts the links, you really prepared to deal with that truth seriously, or are you just demanding the links to be a dick?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Sorry, he posted *one link* from Rand Paul. The allegation that Fauci specifically tampered with the COVID virus to make is spread to humans is an absolute clown show of a conspiracy theory that I've never heard before.

And it doesn't touch upon his claims that Clinton rigged the primaries

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

If you view the posts of jfz and corbell from the perspective suggested with my original post, it becomes clear that they're simply doing exactly what it suggested.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

[deleted]

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

That Fauci was involved in the use of US taxpayer money to fund research into gain of function research has been established for quite some time.

Your claim of ignorance is not credible.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>That Fauci was involved in the use of US taxpayer money to fund research into gain of function research has been established for quite some time.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/10/scicheck-republicans-spin-nih-letter-about-coronavirus-gain-of-function-research/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/29/repeated-claim-that-fauci-lied-congress-about-gain-of-function-research/

The allegation here, specifically, is that Fauci deliberately caused COVID to ensure it could spread from person to person. That is to say that Fauci was wanting to cause a mass pandemic. *That specifically* is the absurd outrageous claim.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Standard lefty "fact checking", focusing on the nearly impossible to prove INTENT, while minimizing or outright ignoring the FACT that Fauci gave US money to a CHINESE lab doing gain of function research even AFTER it FAILED to meet safety protocols.

That alone is a massive reveal of a whole system with level after level of fucked up beyond belief thinking, that at each level, everyone involved should be AT least purged and black listed for life from any position of responsibility and more likely arrested for AT BEST criminal neigligence resulting in millions of deaths.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

The user literally claimed that Fauci did it deliberately. And again, the details are not remotely as he implies. "Watch the movie. Fauci created the gain of function to make the virus spread to humans, to cause widespread panic, and people give up any rights and power for safety and a cure."

This is alleging a conspiracy theory.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

WHY WAS THIS GUY GIVING OUR FUCKING MONEY TO THE FUCKING COMMIE CHINESE TO DO BIO-WEAPON RESEARCH?

WHY HAVE WE NOT ARRESTED EVERY AMERICAN INVOVLED?

WHY HAVE WE GIVEN CHINA A PASS FOR LETTING A FUCKING PANDEMIC OUT OF THE LAB?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I know you want a mass global sanctioning of everything in China, but that's simply not how it worked and works now.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Oh, I know it's not.

The idiots that funded red chinese bio-weapons research with US tax payer money, get a pass.

The idiots that released a global pandemic, get a pass.

And you support that.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I don't think it's viable to mass-sanction the PRC without causing serious harm to oneself. It's a massive country.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

Shouldn’t there be some consequence though? A lot of people died and entire economies were permanently crushed (which is why we have an unprecedented border crisis).

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

What consequence?

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

I suppose the only available one is economic and diplomatic. Certainly cut off all biomedical research exchanges and stop off-shoring such functions to a country incapable of basic quality control. What do you think as my premise was a question to you? It’s incredibly difficult to comprehend that China was allowed to proceed with zero consequences for one of the biggest manmade disasters since WWII.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

And yet it's the right-wing that is always wanting to "de-regulate"...EVERYTHING (even in America)...and who promote the off-shoring of American manufacturing. - Eyeroll -

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

It's stated in my youtube link. It was illegal to do anywhere else. No one will be arrested because the current administration was for it, and works for China, so China won't be punished either.

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

Imagine being this much out of touch. You really should stop, DYOR before questioning people who have already gained the facts. You're out of your element, and asking to be spoon fed at this point in time, is utterly ridiculous.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

You haven't provided any sources for your claims. No-one is required to present your own "research" as evidence for you. You claimed that Fauci deliberately unleashed COVID on the human population on purpose.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Isn't it interesting how so many right-wingers these days try to use the same tactics as online "skeptic" trolls, where they'll base their "arguments" on premises like "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (but then never provide THEIR evidence for THEIR claims), or "you can't prove a negative" (but then base THEIR claims on someone ELSE having to prove the negative the right-winger introduced), etc, etc, etc.

Take one of their "arguments" here for example. The claims against china regarding COVID are based on the premise (that they obviously just expect people to accept) that china released COVID deliberately, even though that has never been proven.

While it HAS been proven that COVID 'originated' in china, that is not the same as the claim that china DELIBERATELY released COVID, so all arguments based on that premise are obviously red-herrings intended only to keep others from 'seeing the forest for only the distractionary trees' that right-wingers obviously want everyone to waste time discussing. ; )

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

https://www.google.com/search?q=why+was+hilary+clinton+given+debate+questions+ahead+of+time&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=573654737&channel=fenc&ei=h2QsZf2zJ53F0PEPx4GlgAg&ved=0ahUKEwi9k9uHivmBAxWdIjQIHcdACYAQ4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=why+was+hilary+clinton+given+debate+questions+ahead+of+time&gs_lp=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&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Wow, that was so hard.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

The allegation more specific was your claim that she "She stole the primaries by deleting thousands of new registered voters who wanted to vote for Bernie. That was NY. In Colorado they made new voters wait for hours, over 10, to vote. All of this was posted on youtube by angry people and memory holed by the media, per usual"

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

If you're unaware of what Clinton leaked emails said at this point and time, it's on YOU. The person who leaked them (Seth Rich), is dead. They died to expose the truth and reality that you have completely ignored and have the gall to question. I'm not your personally history teacher nor need to do your fucking google searches for you, because I honestly don't give a fuck if you believe it or not. Someone that clueless really is better off staying clueless and living your ignorant life of bliss. By the time you catch up, the government will be on the next scandal that you'll eagerly defend like the good bootlicker you are.

I'm sure you think the FTX thing was just your basic crooked swindle crypto deal even though the majority of that money wound up into the democratic party but hey whatever. IDAF what you think and really dont feel the need to spoon feed oblivious people with zero ability to find real news at this juncture, when it's been proven time and time again that the MSM is all fake news. Maybe do the world a favor and just stay out of politics. There's a reason why only white male wealthy land owners were given the right to vote.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

[citation needed]

There is not a single conspiracy theory I suspect you don't believe.

reply

[–] JFZ (1459) a year ago

JFK was killed by one guy. Oswald.

reply

[–] AustraliBoy98 (223) a year ago

Atheism rules.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

This post is literally a Saul Alinsky Tactic lmao.

________________________
"When fascism comes to America, it will come in the name of 'Liberalism'."
-President Ronald Reagan

https://youtube.com/shorts/jPbGsvoNKMw?feature=share

Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Said a person whose entirety of right-wing defending posts on this message board literally confirms what this post suggests. - Eyeroll -

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

What's a Saul Alinsky Tactic? I'm new to that term.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

The simple fact is that whatever accusation bicksurn intended with the term, it applies to bicksurn themselves.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

I definitely see Republicans being concerned that the field of psychiatry will write things for decades about how not to be on the wrong side of history. Criticism from psychiatrists is the biggest fear of any political movement /s/

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

People who rely on such projection always fear exposure.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

Do you have a list of the top 10 political history books by psychiatrists?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Why 10?

It's very clear that the majority of right-wing comments on this message board are made with regards to the CURRENT right wing which is obviously still on board with donald trump, despite occasionally denouncing him publicly to try to fool everyone into believing that their politics are actually objective.

That said, the #1 book by psychiatrists relevant to the history regarding this discussion would be:

"The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President."

https://jaapl.org/content/46/2/267

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

A 2017 book on Trump’s mental fitness for office has nothing to do with the premise in your OP. It appears you couldn’t find anything on topic in your frantic Google search so you just threw something out there. When you also write phrases like: “It's very clear that the majority of right-wing comments on this message board are made with regards to the CURRENT right wing…” it convinces me you’re just making up gibberish. I think I’ll move on to more serious discussions

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

You asked for a book about political history from the field of psychiatry, I provided one, and your response was to simply reject it.

But thank you, YOU just made it very clear that your knee-jerk, automatic dismissal of anything objectively negative about the right-wing, response fit right in with the majority of right-wing comments on this message board

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

If accusing is wrong, what do you want them to do about it? Just don't accuse or don't criticize ever again?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

No one said accusing was "wrong".

Simply pointing out the perspective that right-wing accusations against OTHERS have more often than not been proven to be true about right-wingers THEMSELVES.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) a year ago

[deleted]

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Okay. So what is a person who's NOT right-wing, but has accusations and criticism toward the left-wing, supposed to do about it?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Not pose them with such obvious disingenuousness like right-wingers do obviously.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

How do they do that?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

I just told you, but given your other responses in this thread, it's easy to see that you're just being disingenuous.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

What other responses in this thread?

And no, you haven't told me anything.

If ANY person poses an accusation or criticism towards the democrats/liberals, what would stop YOU from using guilt by association against them?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

And now you're just being disingenuous again.

Unless of course you're finally admitting that you really can't figure these things out for yourself and that's why you're asking me to explain them to you. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Explain "disingenuous".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

So you CAN'T figure these things out for yourself. Admitting it is the first step. Well done.

Unless of course you're being disingenuous again and just playing dumb to waste the time of others.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Explain "disingenuous".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

OK, so you're not "playing" dumb. Glad we got that settled.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Explain "disingenuous".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

You pretending that you're actually being objective and not as right-leaning as you've in fact proven yourself to be on this and other message boards on this site. ; )

So in that way, thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Oh I'm being objective. And while I hardly consider myself right leaning, people like you have often called me that for being objective.

Now if that's your explanation for being disingenuous, then my question is the same as before. How can ANYBODY criticize liberals/democrats without people like you calling them disingenuous or right wingers or guilty themselves?

Sounds to me like that's exactly what you would do to everybody you disagree with. You don't look like the kind of person who verifies any person's history; you just immediately associate them with other guilty people or groups.

Your OP just reeks of poisoning the well.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Why you refuse to view yourself as right-leaning or disingenuous and are trying so hard to keep others from recognizing those things about you is made obvious to anyone who is ACTUALY objective by your posts here and elsewhere on this websites' message board.

So regarding the majority of your latest post, thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Center-left wingers have a few right-learning views all the time. Like being objective, for example.

If I'm an example of what you suggested on this thread, then prove it. Name one thing I accused democrats of that I am guilty of myself.

Your gaslighting, inability to answer my last question, and retarded text winks prove your insecurity even more than you think accusations against democrats prove somebody's guilt. Anyways, thank you for being an example of a coward who relies on guilt by association and poisoning the well arguments, and can't deny it.

; )

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Still denying your other right-wing-leaning posts on this message board eh? Not surprised AT ALL.

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

If I'm an example of what you suggested on this thread, then prove it. Name one thing I accused democrats of that I am guilty of myself.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

You proved to be what I suggested with this thread by suggesting I'd not answered your question when I clearly did...exactly as right-wingers usually do.

[–] arcticdragon (291) 7 days ago
Okay. So what is a person who's NOT right-wing, but has accusations and criticism toward the left-wing, supposed to do about it?

[–] WhoToTrust (827) 7 days ago
Not pose them with such obvious disingenuousness like right-wingers do obviously.

If you want to continue claiming you're not a right-winger, go for it, but given the fact that you've done exactly what right-wingers usually do with the accusations you've made about me (as someone who obviously has left-leaning views given the topic of this thread), you'll of course understand why some may view you as one...or, since you obviously haven't understood yet...you won't.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

You're still not answering my question at all.

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

Once you give me that, tell me how any person can criticize democrats about such topics, without some person saying stuff like
"you've done exactly what right-wingers usually do with the accusations you've made", or
"you are posing them with such obvious disingenuousness like right-wingers do", or
"Every right-wing accusation is a confession".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

I'm trying to decide if you're still being intellectually lazy with your both-sides-are-just-as-bad viewpoint by initially suggesting that the left wing should be questioned the same as the current right-wing....or...just plain and simple lazy by suggesting that it's still my fault that you don't understand what I've been explaining to you when you could have solved that issue on your own by just taking the personal initiative to look up the definition of one word; "DISINGENUOUS". - Eyeroll -

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

You're the one who's accusing me of something. You have to explain and justify your accusations. Telling me to look stuff up myself, or look at myself, is nothing more than gaslighting. I don't respond to gaslighting; it's a coward's strategy.

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

Then tell me how any person can criticize democrats about such topics, without some person saying stuff like
"you've done exactly what right-wingers usually do with the accusations you've made", or
"you are posing them with such obvious disingenuousness like right-wingers do", or
"Every right-wing accusation is a confession".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Once again, I've already provided the answer to your question, "don't pose such obviously disingenuous questions"...and a person who ISN'T doing so would have at least proven they've looked up the definition of the word by now...for THEMSELVES at the very least. Cowardly gaslighting and "every right-wing accusation is a confession" indeed.

Face it, you've only been fooling yourself if you think you've been fooling me with your very obvious, and very right-wing-like "disingenuousness".

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) a year ago

Center-left wingers have a few right-learning views all the time. Like being objective, for example.

what?
"being objective" is a right wing view ?

Just look at the 1000s of delusional posts from morons who believe every lie that comes out of Trumps mouth without question.
also the uniform groupthink on vaccines and Climate change.
that is not "being objective"

You just proved the OPs OP .
case closed .

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

And provided yet another example of right-wing disingenuousness.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

First of all, I've been called a right winger for being objective and not being partisan or biased.

Second, this is just guilt by association. Not every person who has some right-leaning views support Trump, or deny vaccines and climate change.

I am not those other people. I am just me.

So are you going to answer my question to the OP? Name one thing I accused democrats of that I am guilty of myself.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Once again, I've already provided the answer to your question, "don't pose such obviously disingenuous questions"...and a person who ISN'T doing so would have at least proven they've looked up the definition of the word by now...for THEMSELVES at the very least. Cowardly gaslighting and "every right-wing accusation is a confession" indeed.

Face it, you've only been fooling yourself if you think you've been fooling me with your very obvious, and very right-wing-like "disingenuousness".

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

I DID look up disingenuous, and it sounds a lot like YOU right now.

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

Then tell me how any person can criticize democrats about such topics, without people like you saying stuff like "you pose such obviously disingenuous questions". What would stop YOU from saying that to EVERY criticism towards democrats?

I can ask you that a hundred more times, if you don't mind putting your disingenuousness and refusal to answer on display a hundred more times.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Once again, I've already provided the answer to your question, "don't pose such obviously disingenuous questions".

That you're still suggesting I haven't is laughable, transparent, gaslighty, an example of what I suggested with this thread, and yes, therefore disingenuous.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Yawn

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

Then tell me how any person can criticize democrats about such topics, without people like you saying stuff like "you pose such obviously disingenuous questions". What would stop YOU from saying that to EVERY criticism towards democrats?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Once again, I've already provided the answer to your question, "don't pose such obviously disingenuous questions".

That you're still suggesting I haven't is laughable, transparent, gaslighty, an example of what I suggested with this thread, and yes, therefore disingenuous.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

And what would stop YOU from calling every question an "obviously disingenuous question"?

You see, no matter how much you think you're answering the questions I'm asking, you're just not. You look like you're literally answering a DIFFERENT question.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

No, it's YOU who is now purposely asking a different question than you originally did, and acting as if that's not what you're doing.

Or in other words, being DISINGENUOUS. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

No, my disingenuous dude. They're the same questions I've been repeating over and over again. Anybody with passable reading comprehension can recognize that.

The top one being literally a copy and paste. As it was for the last several posts.

And you still refuse to answer both.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Your repeated attempts at projection simply won't work. Anyone who has read your comments and isn't disingenuous has already understood that...and you're still simply refusing to admit that.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

You came back just to show that you still can't answer my questions, huh?

Yawn.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

So your plan is to be disingenuous to the end huh? (Rhetorical question). ; )

Yawn indeed.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

So your plan is to be disingenuous to the end huh? (Rhetorical question). ; )

Yawn indeed.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Obviously, even every right-wing-LIKE accusation is also a confession...and just as unimaginative. Sad.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Yawn. Alright, if you want to keep doing this.

What did I accuse democrats of, which I am guilty of myself? "History, the legal system, psychiatry, etc, etc, etc"

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

By "keep doing this", you've obviously referring to your tactic of changing your questions/moving-your-goal-post when you know you've lost the debate hoping no one will notice. ; )

Sad...and as always...disingenuous.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Dude, you are an asshole and a troll.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Me pointing out your behavior, is not an example of anything.

It's me pointing out your behavior.

YOu seem to think you are being clever.

You're like a child, with his hands over his ears screaming, "I can't hear you".

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Dude. This is sad.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

You certainly are.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Except, I'm not. YOu are. Your little game was stupid when you started. That you are still holding on, is pathetic.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

As I've said, every right-wing accusation is a confession.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

lol. You're fucking retarded.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

As I've said, every right-wing accusation is a confession. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Yeah, we heard. It's a silly... game you are playing.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

As I've said, every right-wing accusation is a confession. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Dude. You're being pathetic.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Every right-wing accusation is a confession. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

No, it's not. That is a stupid thing to say.

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Lol at the guy who wrote "Everything right-wingers accuse Democrats/Liberals of" in his OP, then refuses to name even one accusation I made against democrats, then accuses me of moving goalpost.

Also, you just admitted that you lied about the solutions you gave, and that you would do exactly what I suspected you would do. Way to go, my disingenuous dud. ; )

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

You're not fooling anyone...except yourself apparently.

It's obviously you who is doing exactly what I described with my OP. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Lol at the guy who wrote "Everything right-wingers accuse Democrats/Liberals of" in his OP, then refuses to name even one accusation I made against democrats.
; )

You're not fooling anyone...except yourself apparently.

It's obviously YOU who is doing exactly what YOU described with YOUR OP. ; )

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] arcticdragon (520) a year ago

Lol at the guy who wrote "Everything right-wingers accuse Democrats/Liberals of" in his OP, then refuses to name even one accusation I made against democrats.

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what you suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

STILL conveniently refusing to admit I answered your initial question I see. ; )

Sad!

reply

[–] CraigC (8160) a year ago

The liberal tactic, borrowed from the Nazi's, is to blame the opposition for that which they are guilty. Sorry but you can't flip the script with more lies.

Liberal fucktards are literally leading America into oblivion and calling us dumb all the while.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

LOL. HiLARIOUS.

i don't know whether you are too brainless to realize that you are demonstrating his point,

or too soulless to care that you have been stone cold called out.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

LOL. You might think you are being cute or clever. You are neither.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

One would hope that you might just consider thinking at some point, but given your past record, I doubt many that have read your posts are holding their breath waiting for that to happen. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Dude. It is YOUR position and actions that show that all YOU are doing, is holding your hands over your ears and refusing to listen to anything you don't like.

My past record is of holding serious and honest discussions with anyone that is willing to do so.

Which, includes almost no lefties. At some level you people have realized that your agenda is not good for Americans or America, so you are all dishonest at some level.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

LOL. You're pathetic. Do you really think you are being clever?

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

All rational, objective people these days know that it's right-wingers who always think they're being clever (when what they're obviously being is pathetic). Thank you DON'T know that illustrates what you're willing to realize, so thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Except that we are in a thread where we can see you playing a pathetic game.

YOu can SAY shit, and you can form sentences as though they are making a point.

BUt if the shit you say is bullshit, then you are just talking shit.

What you are claiming is unsupported bullshit. While my words are supported by your current behavior.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Except that we are in a thread where we can see you playing a pathetic game.

YOu can SAY shit, and you can form sentences as though they are making a point.

BUt if the shit you say is bullshit, then you are just talking shit.

What you are claiming is unsupported bullshit. While my words are supported by your current behavior.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Except that we are in a thread where we can see you playing a pathetic game.

YOu can SAY shit, and you can form sentences as though they are making a point.

BUt if the shit you say is bullshit, then you are just talking shit.

What you are claiming is unsupported bullshit. While my words are supported by your current behavior.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] chilone (17857) a year ago

Objectively speaking, you lose.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] chilone (17857) a year ago

You're on the wrong side and you know it.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

He thinks he is being clever, when he has been stone cold busted.

Sad.

reply

[–] chilone (17857) a year ago

Totally.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you both for your ADDITIONAL examples of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] chilone (17857) a year ago

Thank YOU for once again proving that liberalism is a mental disorder.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] chilone (17857) a year ago

Thank YOU for once again proving that liberalism is a mental disorder.

See how silly you are? No go ahead and have your most coveted last word.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested with this thread. ; )

reply

[–] tvfan (12729) a year ago

That sounds like a left-wing accusation; therefore, your confession.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] tvfan (12729) a year ago

Thank you for confirming mine.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for proving you still don't understand your initial post didn't even make sense as a response to the thread, which as was pointed out, provided another perfect example of what I suggested. ; )

reply

[–] blue1981 (7735) a year ago

The way I Interpret this post is everytime a liberal cries and says their opponent is a racist it's projecting when they are racists themselves. Biden's racist history is well documented in his 50+ years in politics.

reply

[–] WhoToTrust (1119) a year ago

Thank you for yet ANOTHER example of exactly what I suggested. ; )

reply