“What a lot of crap. What a lot of crap,” Trump said of using the word “insurrection” to refer to Jan. 6
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-rally-wyoming-cheney-hageman-1360299/amp/
One person died, an unarmed Air Force veteran shot in the face by capitol police. The other six you're referring to died afterwards, unrelated.
It was not an insurrection and anyone calling it that is a liar or a fool.
You’re insane
shareIt's the truth. You only think it's insane because everything you believe is a lie.
shareRemember how they wanted to murder babies 2 weeks ago, now they want to disarm people to save babies....can't make it up!
shareApparently they have to be born to be worth anything. Except some liberals think they should be able to abort them afterwards. Oh the things they want to do for the children are as bad as they things they want to do 'to' the children. They are a commodity to them, nothing more. Same for minorities. They only pretend to care about them.
shareYup, they want to experience childbirth, but not actual motherhood. Much in the same way a lot of women want a wedding, but not the marriage.
shareExactly! Because they have no plans to actually mother a child. They'll play with it like a doll for a while and then put it off on social media, Netflix and Nintendo.
share"Except some liberals think they should be able to abort them afterwards."
You two are fucking nuts!
Have you actually checked with the republican party that you're still allowed in?
I reckon Even Trump would say "woah there! , we like a traditional conservative but you two are crazy extremists"
Also , abortion of a fertiliased egg is accepted throught the civilised world as acceptable and morally fine , excepty by crazy cults like "catholics" and other religioopus gangs
... and apparently republican extremists.
I bet id you surveyed the republican party on wether they agreed wioth abortion most of the non crazy ones would say "i dont have a problem with it"
Cute deflection. It's comical, my views have not changed in 30yrs but it hasn't been until the last five years that I've been labeled an extremist. Maybe it's you dummies that are the extremists? Ever consider that??? Oh no, that would require self awareness.
share"my views have not changed in 30yrs "
well , times change , 30 years ago it was illegal for gays to get married , hell 30 years before that it was illegal for gays to exist.
Now they can get married.
Now some will say this was a wrong turn and should never be allowed , but the majority of society has decided by majority ( and common fucking sense) that this is now ok.
Black people sitting at the back of the bus? now also not ok .
Back a 100 years - if a N******r got uppity and stole some food it was ok to string him up without trial like you were putting a dangerous dog down. now - not so much.
if you dont move the times you do indeed become an "extremist"
Times change. Values, morals and standards do not. Or should not. I'm not talking about sending blacks to the back of the bus. Nor am I talking about the 1950's. I'm talking about the 30yrs that I have been a voting adult. That's 1992 for those of you who failed math class.
Liberals and the whole democrat party have gone way off the deep end. Yet they turn around and shout "extremist" to the other end. It's comical how little you understand of yourselves. You don't even understand the point I'm making.
Didn’t a Catholic Republican-nominated jurist write that Supreme Court opinion declaring gay marriage to be constitutionally protected? And what was the political party affiliation of that Supreme Court Chief Justice who almost single-handedly achieved the unanimous common law destruction of segregation in public schools and transportation (including Montgomery Alabama’s segregated buses you write about)?
shareI'm guessing Republican?
good on them
good example of "moving with the times"
"about time" you might say , especially the segregation example
It was a fascist coup attempt. Donald the fascist Trump tried a fascist coup attempt.
Robert Paxton, Anatomy of Fascism, 2004:
Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal constraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.
LMAO🤣
share1. The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”
2. The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”
3. The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”
4. Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”
5. Fear of difference. “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.”
6. Appeal to social frustration. “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.”
7. The obsession with a plot. “The followers must feel besieged. The easiest way to solve the plot is the appeal to xenophobia.”
8. The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”
9. Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.”
10. Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”
11. Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”
12. Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”
13. Selective populism. “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.”
14. Newspeak. “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.”
Here, you lost your tin-foil hat.
shareI find your alternative history amusing. Confederates won the war as well amirite? Every mass shooting is by some crazed leftist lunatic trying to bring about gun control to take away your 2nd amendment. Jesus is king. Mob rule is bad unless we do it.
Real Facts:
-Some died before Babbit, some died after.
-She was shot in the shoulder/neck, not face, for intruding on government property, putting in danger elected officials and crossed a threshold deemed a red line within the building.
-If we're doing 'in-connection' to the Capitol attack, that would be 9 deaths in total (1 shot, 1 overdose, 3 heart failure, 4 suicides)
Cute story, I don't know what all that rambling in the beginning is about. Other than your attempt to paint with a very broad brush.
She put no one in danger. I've been studying defensive shootings for 30 fucking years. There was NO justification for that shooting.
Alternative history??? Here's what Wikipedia says:
Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed 35-year-old Air Force veteran, was fatally shot in the upper chest by Lt. Michael Leroy Byrd while attempting to climb into the shattered window of a barricaded door.[371] This was soon ruled a justified homicide.[288][372][373]
Brian Sicknick, a 42-year-old responding Capitol Police officer, was pepper-sprayed during the riot and had two thromboembolic strokes the next day,[374][375] after which he was placed on life support[8] and soon died.[376][377] The D.C. chief medical examiner found he died from a stroke, classifying his death as natural,[378] and commenting that "all that transpired played a role in his condition".[379][380]
Rosanne Boyland, 34, died of an amphetamine overdose during the riot rather than, as was initially reported, from being trampled by other rioters after her collapse,[381] ruled accidental by the D.C. medical examiner's office.[19] Her mother, Cheryl Boyland, told NBC News, "She was not doing drugs. The only thing they found was her own prescription medicine."[382]
Kevin Greeson, 55, and Benjamin Philips, 50, died naturally from coronary heart disease and hypertensive heart disease.[19]
Boyland died from an overdose, at the riot, not 'because' of the riot. Suicides after the fact are irrelevant.
Ashli Babbit was the only one who died and you people don’t seem too concerned seeing how she was an unarmed woman who served her country bravely. I get it, by your standard she voted for Trump so she deserved to die, but your typical BLM thug who torches a courthouse, he has rights and if he’s killed while trying to kill a cop then the cop is automatically a racist fascist or whatever. Your moral standards are ass backwards. Seriously quit bitching about 1/6, all it’s exposing is your own immaturity.
shareExactly! They'll riot for a convicted violent felon dying in police custody because he resisted arrest. But an armed USAF veteran who was shot at a protest, that's cool. They only care about winning, no matter the cost.
shareAshli Babbits blood is on Trumps hands.
His, and all of his cohorts who planned the rally.
Nothing good came out of it .
You can watch all the details and facts live on TV this summer.
Unfortunately, all the treasonous cowards probably won’t show up
The big lie continues that Trump planned this, he clearly said march “peacefully and patriotically”, her blood is on whoever shot her and the DemoKKKrats who refuse to hold her killer accountable. Just be honest for a second, if she were a BLM thug burning down a courthouse you would be screaming for the cop to be jailed.
Our attention should be focused on the 574 insurrections that Biden and the DemoKKKrat cult incited.
Watch the commission hearings . Hopefully Donald Trump will testify and claim his innocence regarding the insurrection and it’s long detailed plot.
But he won’t show up.
I wonder why?
It wasn’t an insurrection, all it was was a couple of idiots walking into a building and a DemoKKKrat lie designed to divert attention away from their own failed policies.
shareMy God, your TDS is terminal.
Ashli Babbit's blood is on the cop who pulled the trigger and those who decided it was justified.
Yep! He’s terminal due to the anti-Trump pea pods (injected with TDS) taking over his body! Yatzo is really an alien now. Not from south of the border, but somewhere from outer space. Sad, very sad. 😟🙇🏼♀️
shareThe air force vet wasn't shot in the face she was shot in the chest area. Trump said she was shot in the face but he can't even get it right how his followers died for him.
shareWhat difference does it make, she's fucking dead.
shareI guess not much. But saying she was shot in the face sounds worse and we need as much accuracy in the reporting of info as possible. Misinformation and playing on people's emotions is how we got into this mess.
shareShe was unarmed and not a direct threat to anyone. They shot her, she's dead. What difference does it make where?
sharePeople who believe that was an 'actual' insurrection 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️.
I get the left 'want' it to be for political purposes ... But come on lol.
Also loads of people died in BLM peaceful riots.
Adultbabies gonna whine.
shareTrump is the definition of a whining adult baby. Lol!
share574 insurrections incited by the DemoKKKrat cult, you have nothing to say about that because it would hurt your lies and false narratives.
sharehttps://c.tenor.com/Qqhtb7KbrGcAAAAC/princess-bride-you-keep-using-that-word.gif
shareNo intelligent response I see.
sharein·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/15/false-comparison-between-last-summers-protests-what-happened-capitol/
People walked into a building, if that’s violent to you then you need to toughen up. But I know you can’t let go of it because it is literally the only thing you people have to run on, it’s pathetic.
And the BLM riots were very much violent uprisings against an authority or government. They flat out said that they would burn the country do the ground if the police weren’t defunded. And there were 574 of them and BLM continues to terrorize innocent people. That is the literal definition of terrorism. 1/6 is a complete non-issue, the only thing that needs to be investigated is who shot Ashli Babbit.
Also do you seriously expect me to take the Washington Post seriously? That’s far left fake news. If I cited OAN you’d reject it.
Much of the violence in BLM protests were due to right-wing militia members trying to provoke violence.
A rightwing extremist boasted of driving from Texas to Minneapolis to help set fire to a police precinct during the George Floyd protests, federal prosecutors said. US attorney Erica MacDonald said on Friday that she had charged Ivan Harrison Hunter, a 26-year-old Texas resident, with traveling across state lines to participate in a riot. The charges are the latest example of far-right extremists attempting to use violence to escalate national protests against police brutality into an uprising against the government, and even full civil war.
Lol not even close, BLM would show up and would start torching court houses and assaulting cops. They are domestic terrorists and the 574 summer 2020 riots were instigated by far left radicals such as Biden, Pelosi and Harris who told them to go to major cities and destroy property and kill cops. You’re a coward for refusing to own up to this.
Funny how the far left fake news never mentioned this in the past 2 years considering they will do anything to blame it on fake “far right militia”. You are falling for the far lefts big lie.
Oh yes, the Washington Post, bastion of truth!
shareDo you people actually hate Donald Trump....? Because its got to the point where its feels more like obsession now. Like a weird sexual obsession. What's that like?
shareI mean worst insurrection of all time right? - Apparently rabid gun nuts forgot to bring their guns and tried 'overthrowing' the government without them.
Cmon 🤦🏿♂️.
the most armed country in the history of the planet and their insurrection used none? Leftists have one speed- hate.
shareAh, I see. You are a Nazi apologist because you're actually a fascist propagandist. Who placed pipe bombs? Why were people arrested for having guns?
You dumb motherfucker.
all you have is ad hominem. Pipe bomb was placed by leftist lunatic.
shareEi incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The onus of proof is on the one that claims something, not the one that denies. If there's a (scientific) consensus or someone is presenting a controversial claim, then it's customary that the onus of proof falls on them.
SO THE ONUS OF PROOF FALLS DOUBLY ON YOU. Prove your claim with evidence from valid sources.
You can't, can you, you fascist?
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
See, you're already learning so much, you fascist fuck. I already told you insults are perfectly acceptable as long as I have an argument. Fuckwit. Grow a brain and some thicker skin.
hahahahahah remember when it was a secret democratic BLM protest to make republicans look bad. now it was republicans it just "wasnt that bad"
you clowns cant get a straight story
I know right.....Trump Supporters must be one hell of an organized super army if they can take over a whole country with their bare hands!!!
No wonder the lefties shit their pants at the mere thought!
Learn to read, Nazi. The fact that dumbass Trump fascists are retarded and inefficient isn't what's in dispute. Your red herring does nothing to prove that what I said is false. Republicans in power tried a fascist coup attempt by various means - by instigating violence, by voting against certifying the results of an election, by intimidating various elections officials, by planning to seize ballots and so on and on.
shareDo you get paid for this? You probably could if you don't.
shareOh, my, oh my. Why, isn't this a shill gambit, which is a special type of an ad hominem attack. You know, those are big no-nos considering you replied like 6 times to me about them.
Yes, I feel like I should be paid. You should pay me for educating you.
I'm serious- Soros and that type will pay you for this.
shareLearn to read, Nazi.
Red herring - irrelevant. The fact the fascist coup attempt was badly organized and carried out does not mean it wasn't a fascist coup attempt. Nice try, you fascist dolt.
shareNo that's what I mean, they were literal Nazi's but totally disorganized ... Idiots!
sharedo you believe that they just forgot their guns? Is that what you're suggesting?
shareThey had pipe bombs, guns and used flag poles, for example, as weapons. You dumbass fascist.
shareLies. If they had these, plus it was an insurrection, why weren't they used?
shareweapons were used to bludgeon officers. guns were confiscated. zip ties were found. and a pipe bomb too
the fact you want to ignore these facts doesnt change them clown
Bludgeoning in the country with the most firearms? as an insurrection move? I wouldn't believe leftists if they swore they were lying.
sharelookup the definition of insurrection. there is no standard of weapons needed.
wait wasnt it all a BLM false flag at first? thats what you clowns claimed? now it wasnt it was actually republicans but it wasnt that bad.
yes but an insurrection in the country with the most firearms, yet none were used, and it was because they forgot to use guns? Do you believe that?
shareit doesnt matter if they came with guns (some did and were confiscated) or spoons. their intent was clear
shareThat makes no sense though. If they came with spoons then their intention would be to eat. If they did not use guns then their intention was most definitely not insurrection. You have to follow the evidence., otherwise you have no character, honesty or decency.
share"That makes no sense though. If they came with spoons then their intention would be to eat."
some did come with guns that got confiscated. as well as zip ties.they used blunt weapons as well as pepper spray. whether they all came fully armed to the teeth or not is irrelevant. they came January 6th for a reason. that was the day they were finalizing the results. video shows at various times, hundreds of them talking and yelling about finding mike pence and Nancy Pelosi.
they literally broke into the capitol. I go off words and actions. The fact thy came without lots of guns is irrelevant.
its like me breaking into a bank, yelling how im going to rob it, actually breaking into it. but only bringing a knife. then claiming "well I didnt bring guns! I didnt have enough firepower so I clearly wasnt trying to rob it despite what I said and my actions"
"otherwise you have no character, honesty or decency."
LOL stfu please. they only one with none of those things are you. who is willing to abandon all honest and logical argument to use mental gymnastics to defend what happened.
they chose jan 6th for a reason. not jan 7th, or 8th or 9th. they are shown shouting about the election and trying to find Pelosi and Pence.
The vocal ones for the most part have been proven to be federal plants and leftists. Guns are legal in the US- individuals carrying is only a sign that they live in the US. By that measure if they had a condom in their wallet they should be convicted of rape. You are not honest and you know it.
"The vocal ones for the most part have been proven to be federal plants and leftists."
citation please
" Guns are legal in the US- individuals carrying is only a sign that they live in the US. By that measure if they had a condom in their wallet they should be convicted of rape."
WOW where did you get that? the point was "they don't have to have a gun for it to be an insurrection. I never said "everyone with a gun was an insurrectionist"
wow explain that "logic" please or where I said that?
"You are not honest and you know it."
I am honest. you are incredibly stupid though clearly.
again. it was an insurrection. their goal was to overturn the democratic results. whether they were armed to the teeth or not changes nothing
from earlier: "they literally broke into the capitol."
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Video-Proves-Police-Let-Protestors-into-Capitol
"citation please"
https://www.westernjournal.com/confirmed-disguised-leftists-infiltrated-trump-crowd-jan-6-said-told-fbi-infiltrate-maga/
https://wentworthreport.com/2021/12/22/new-details-of-fed-involvement-in-the-jan-6-riot/
"WOW where did you get that? the point was "they don't have to have a gun for it to be an insurrection. I never said "everyone with a gun was an insurrectionist"
wow explain that "logic" please or where I said that?"
you insist it was an armed insurrection.
"again. it was an insurrection. their goal was to overturn the democratic results."
citation please
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEEEMB0c5So
HEREs an actual video of them breaking windows to get in. amazing how your video isnt a main entrance. and doesnt start right away. weird how it starts once the door is open... I wonder why
The vocal ones for the most part have been proven to be federal plants and leftists
Two leftists infiltrated the Jan. 6 mob that stormed the Capitol and later said they told the FBI how to “infiltrate Trump rallies.”
The two men are Walter Masterson and Peter Scattini and a quick look skim through their respective Twitter feeds shows that they are, indeed, leftists.
An additional video blog posted on Feb. 17 features Scattini explaining how FBI agents approached the two men after their Jan. 6 stunt.
This lines up with a recent assertion made by Fox News personality Tucker Carlson that the FBI had agents on the inside during the Jan. 6 incursion.
you insist it was an armed insurrection.
[deleted]
"oh pelosi, oh mike Pence, we are coming for you too you fucking traitor"
the mental gymnastics these clowns have to do to say a clear violence insurrection wasnt one is hilarious
LOL from that very same article. YOUR OWN article talking about the two guys filming. yes 2.
None of this changes the fact that many Trump supporters present during the incursion broke the law and should be punished for their crimes.
Perhaps even more shockingly, what this news also reveals is the fact the FBI may very well have had something to do with the events on Jan. 6.
from earlier: "they literally broke into the capitol."
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Video-Proves-Police-Let-Protestors-into-Capitol
"citation please
you insist it was an armed insurrection.
citation please
Whew I got to you didn't I? I don't haven the health or desire to try to hold back the tide of your confirmation bias but I recommend you watch this, and try some meditation.
https://rumble.com/v17h6qx-the-truth-of-january-6th.html
HAHAHAHAHA this was the most embarrassing cop outing running away ive ever seen on this board. In other words "shit my article didnt prove anything about plants. it actually purposely misrepresent the timeline of these left wingers (if even true). it also still blamed trumpers. And my edited video also didnt show what it claims. "oh fuck umm claim hes mad and run away!"
damn you got intellectually destroyed here
what happened to your left wing fbi plant story and "the officers let them in!". hahahahaha you crumbled like feta
this is what happens when a Trumpist comes up against facts and reality
Because they were disorganized Trumper idiots thank God! They did do some damage with their bear spray spears though
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/597258-gao-says-114-capitol-police-officers-reported-injuries-far-more-than/amp/
lol so they didn't use firearms because they were disorganized?
shareHaven't a bunch of the agitators been linked back to Pantifa?
shareyou could easily provide a link if that was the case. yet you just spread your trumpets nonsense.
shareUs high-IQ, critical thinkers do not require "links" for every little thing we have read, that you don't want to believe.
Go away, stalker.
LOLLL "critical thinkers do not require "links" for every little thing we have read, "
noo but big claims you and no one has ever demonstrated sure as fuck does. repeating lies doesnt make it true
you have the burden of proof clown boy. now meet it
oh look! they were let in so thats why they had to smash the windows on the sides of the door to gain entrance?
https://youtu.be/CEEEMB0c5So
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/watch-pro-trump-rioters-smash-glass-in-attempt-to-break-into-us-capitol/2488554/
Was it 2 or 3 police officer suicides?
Thats very irregular...
Questionable gov insurrection lead and filmed by black activist John Sullivan.
He has not faced a day in jail, others are locked up until trial.
CIA won't admit how many plants they had in the crowd. The way the Democrats are using this as the end all goes to.show how much effort they put into using this crisis
There was no insurrection. It wasn't even trespassing. It's a Democratic hoax
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT2afYVlo6g
Democrats are traitors to the country.
The cops let them in too. Didn't a few of the detainees get off because of the video footage of that?
sharewow you've learned well from Tucker Carlson. make the statement in the form of a question. provide no evidence.
noo they weren't let in. you can watch the videos of them smashing the glass windows to the side of the door. thats how they gained entrance
2 stalk-posts in the same thread? JFC dude.
sharesoooo you cant provide any evidence. jfc stay off movie chat
good thing those capitol guards let them in the capitol. is that why they had to smash the windows beside the main entrance to gain entrance?? weird......
https://youtu.be/CEEEMB0c5So
Did you watch all the videos?
Are you blind?
FBI was behind this and the cops let them in. It was designed to discredit Trump.
sharevideo of cops letting them in please. ill wait
shareThe cops let them in. Even Tim Pool acknowledged that.
sharelol even Tim? a right winger???? its like saying "even tucker Carlson says that"
but the aside I dont GIVE A FUCK what Tim acknowledged. SHOW ME EVIDENCE.
cause I can show you a video of closed locked capitol door. while protestors smash in the windows to get in and unlock the door
Tim is left wing you moron.
shareLOOOLL you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.
its Tim pool and Dave Rubins angle. claim to be on the left and the last "true liberal", yet agree with the right on everything and only attack the left.
wow do some research you clown
You can call him anything you want, but he says they let them in and I trust him more than you or CNN & New York Times.
shareyes you a right winger like time pool.. every wonder why???
ill give you a hint. cause he is one.
again is the Saargon and Dave Rubin strategy.
https://i.imgur.com/j1Ss2oa.jpg
LOLLL every single one of these videos is pro conservative attacking the left
The left has become a parody of itself so even liberals like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool are on the right side of culture wars while not being true conservatives.
sharethey duped you lol. its their shtick. their hustle. its how they make money. im not suprised. you are incredibly stupid and you fell for it hahahahahaha
shareYou actually sit through that nonsense?
shareDo you think the capitol protest was worse than what happened in uvalde?
shareA coup to overthrow our Democracy?
Pretty serious
How do you overthrow democracy (again, we're a constitutional republic) without firearms??? Seriously, change your tampon and dispense with the hysterics.
Further, no one condones what they did. It was wrong and they should not have done it. However, it is a HUGE lie that it was an insurrection. All you're doing is perpetuating a lie and looking like a fool doing it.
So you think it was worse than what happened in uvalde?