MovieChat Forums > AnthonySocksss > Replies
AnthonySocksss's Replies
No you monkey, it only applies to you because that is literally what you are arguing, that your witnesses are liars, lmfao
What exactly is your point about “primary sources”? Are you saying you don’t believe first-hand witness accounts or something?
No, that’s just logic. You’re basically just saying “trust me bro”. Why should anyone trust you? If someone told you the moon was made of cheese would you just believe them? Lmfao
No you monkey, the primary source is literally first-hand evidence of your claim. A witness being interviewed at the site describing what they saw, video footage, literally anything other than a second-hand account by some social-media looney. Unless you’re saying your sources of this would be lies and deception, which is basically your point. Smh
You rank Dracula over The Conversation? I enjoy Dracula, especially the fever dream-ish atmosphere and visuals. It’s certainly a better adaptation than the ‘79 one with Frank Langella. The only flaw is the atrocious casting of Keanu Reeves.
I also don’t like Adam driver. Not only is he ugly as hell, but he’s super camp.
I prefer actors like Michael fassbender who at least have a bit of gravitas. But that was the least of this film’s problems, everything from the story, production/costume design, SFX, and script was atrocious.
A primary source is a statement from an actual “victim” corroborating what was said, not a game of Chinese telephone on twitter, you ape
what does unprotected sex have to do with anything?
“Netflix miniseries”
That’s just elongating a turd
The whole franchise is dumb
It’s too bad none of the versions adapted the book properly. They all completely changed some things and left out subplots from the book.
Usually people constantly whining about trans people are themselves closeted trans.
Salem’s Lot. The book is creepy as shit because you don’t realize it’s about vampires until about halfway through, and that Hubert Marston invited Nosferatu to the town.
Yeah he grew up poor, his father left them, his mom was a single working mother, and he was heavily bullied as a kid, to the point his babysitter used to fart in his face:
“ Eula-Beulah was prone to farts—the kind that are both loud and smelly. Sometimes when she was so afflicted, she would throw me on the couch, drop her wool-skirted butt on my face, and let loose. “Pow!” she’d cry in high glee. It was like being buried in marshgas fireworks. I remember the dark, the sense that I was suffocating, and I remember laughing. Because, while what was happening was sort of horrible, it was also sort of funny. In many ways, Eula-Beulah prepared me for literary criticism. After having a two-hundred-pound babysitter fart on your face and yell Pow!, The Village Voice holds few terrors.”
Also King used to bully other kids.
This is the main appeal of the movie for simpletons: they need the worn out trope of a child in peril, also they need women to be butch and masculine, and they need shinier special effects.
It didn’t innovate anything except special effects, but the first one had a better story and more likeable characters.
LoL
The burden of proof isn’t on me bro
He couldn’t even make a better movie than T1
so you’re saying the reason you don’t have any source to provide is that your source would be a lie, because your argument is lies and deception.
It’s very clear you didn’t even manage to graduate high school, ha dum dum.