MovieChat Forums > AnthonySocksss > Replies
AnthonySocksss's Replies
Turning 40 is a milestone, but not like it used to be. 40 year olds are generally healthier and younger looking than they were decades ago. They say 40 is the new 30. For a lot of people, 40s are their peak years (either professionally, romantically, or spiritually).
If it came out in the 80s it would’ve been better, as Julie Andrews was still young enough for the role. There were 8 books in the series so I don’t know why Disney never turned it into a movie franchise sooner, although probably something to do with losing the rights and the author being cranky.
An example of a good 80s sequel to a classic movie is Return to Oz from 1985.
New actresses for Dorothy but picks up where the last one left off.
Well unfortunately it wouldn’t work and would most likely bomb, just like Mary Poppins Returns did. Legacy sequels are usually trash, just like Texasville and The Two Jakes
Of course a dumbass like that would approve of a dumbass law
Wrong, the dark knight is a cheese fest.
The untouchables is purposefully tongue in cheek and stylized, which is what makes it work.
Because there’s such a thing as paternity tests
If 39 is old then 50 must be so ancient you’ll need a cane and walker?
you’ll waste it arguing with strangers on the internet, in the blink of an eye you’ll be on your death bed.
Also you’re no spring chicken either.
Nice projection. How long have you been living in your parent’s basement you incel? They should turn off your internet already.
Either that or your boyfriend doesn’t beat you enough, prequel fanboi. Go jerk off to your Analin skywalker poster faget.
Now fuck off, like I said before, cuntface LoL. 🤣🤡
Except Evan Almighty actually involved the same character from the original played by the same actor. Also Evan almighty was an
Unfunny garbage,
Soulless cash-in and shouldn’t have been made. Just like gladiator II. This isn’t helping your case.
You lose again.
What a dumb place to hold a clandestine meeting
You’ll be “fucking old” soon then
Lol this is too entertaining. “Wuchak” comes in on his high horse and finger wagging, despite being an illiterate asshole unable to realize his sock started the “ad-hominems” (aka insults) by calling me a “gimp”, and then PROCEEDS to use an ad-hominem attack in his very response. Your journey to being a dumb asshole is officially complete buddy! At that point it’s scorched earth where you get what you give. Do you go through life as an oblivious hypocrite all the time, or is this a recent development, I’m curious.
Can’t wait for your tepid response as I deconstruct your stupidity and continue to verbally annihilate you. Or better yet, don’t bother responding coward 🤡
What you’re describing isn’t sequels, they’re fucking spinoffs you tetard. There is nothing to make a sequel about with citizen Kane. Explain how a sequel to citizen Kane involving a butler would be in any way good? Would you call it citizen Kane II? Holly fuck. You are retarded. Explain how the Catholic Church is a sequel to the Bible. Were you born this fuckin g stupid?
You’re fetarded and don’t realize I’m quoting the video link I posted, which skewers the prequels. Yes, they will always be around because they’re steaming piles of shit. Now fuck off cunt 🤡
<url> https://youtu.be/xcdlo6xqgtw</url>
Star Wars: The Phantom Menace was the most disappointing thing since my son. I mean, how much more could you possibly fuck up the entire backstory to Star Wars? And while my son eventually hanged himself in the bathroom of the gas station, the unfortunate reality of the Star Wars prequels is that they'll be around. Forever. They will never go away. It can never be undone.
The issue is that they’re not continuing the story, there is no story to continue without jsut being a retread of the original. Not everything needs a sequel ffs. You want a sequel to the Bible too?
Revenge of the shit is absolutely a retcon. Apparently Chewie knew Yoda the whole time? Why don’t chewie say in episode IV “Hey I know Yoda”
<blockquote> So within the film continuity itself, 3 creates the plot hole which shows up in 6.</blockquote>
Isn’t that what I just said? The plot hole is in 3. Not 6.
The answer to your question is that the prequels were terribly written and make no sense. Remove them from the equation and there is no “plot hole”, or inconsistency.
if your idea of “expansion” is remaking the same movie over and over then it is in fact you that’s a limited bastard