MovieChat Forums > nooneimportant > Replies
nooneimportant's Replies
I have doubts you’ve even seen it, groomer. Your pathetic attempt at flaming me out is proof you don’t have anything intelligent to contribute.
They made a film, and they made money from their film. Just like how Disney made 2 billion dollars from rehashing Star Wars: A New Hope
Gotta love your flawed logic: If a someone says “child sex abuse is bad” but they don’t do enough to combat the issue by your standards then they should just be quiet and stop saying “child sex abuse is bad”, all in the meanwhile you won’t even say “child sex abuse is bad”. If you’re not going to do anything to solve the problem then quit complaining that others aren’t doing enough, it’s sick.
So you do like the movie? Have you even seen it? You’re also deflecting, you said that you wanted them to tell the audience how they could help. You literally could tell people how they can help without throwing a bitch fit over the film, groomer. Even if the people behind the film did nothing to help the victims of child sex abuse by making the film they have already done far more than anything you or anyone else from your political party ever did.
The website directs the viewer to how they can make a difference. If it weren’t for the film then fewer people would have visited the website. You seem very triggered by this film, you need to calm down, take a deep breath and accept the fact that you are literally on the side of child traffickers and you are a disturbed individual.
So then why hasn’t the website been shut down? You know you people love shutting down platforms that dont’ allign with your radical ideology and since it’s so obvious it’s a scam you’d think someone would have done something about it. Nice try, groomer.
There was a line where it was stated he was English.
Thank you, this baseless assertion that John Mason is James Bond is really infuriating to anyone who even has the slightest idea who James Bond is as a character and who actually pays attention to the series.
You mean by giving the power to decide abortion laws back to the states which is what the constitution dictates per the 10th amendment? Nice try.
You mean preventing children from being allowed to consent to life altering surgeries that affect their hormone levels, puberty and even their own sex organs? It’s called protecting children, they cannot consent to changing their gender because they are children and their brains aren’t fully developed. It’s the same reason why they can’t consent to sexual intercourse or drink alcohol.
Nice strawman, groomer
It wasn’t even hinted at, this is totally made up and there is zero proof to back it up. James Bond and John Mason are two completely different characters. Mason was locked up when Bond was in outer space, Bond is Scottish, Mason is English, and they act nothing like each other.
Are Bond and Stu from Mrs. Doubtfire also the same character?
It’s not even a fan “theory”, it’s not even a “hypothesis”, it’s a random make up your own fan fiction assertion. The only thing Bond and Mason have in common is they were both played by Sean Connery.
I mean what next is Dr. Loomis from Halloween really Blofeld?
Regardless Die Another Day is far from the worst Bond film, in fact I ranked it 12th. It’s silly but it’s also fun and they did something new and creative with it by having Bond getting blacklisted. It’s a heck of a lot better than No Time To Die which IMO is the actual worst Bond film ever and it’s not even close.
Trust me little man, you aren’t that hard to figure out.
You can tell the audience to help or promote charitable organizations without smearing the film. You can walk and chew gum at the same time, groomer.
Face it, you people don’t like the movie because it was made by people you disagree with and because it puts a huge hole in your pro-child grooming fetish.
You’re deflecting and changing the subject. I never said anything about the quality of DAD. I said that he was abandoned in that film and he stayed loyal. Also DAD was nowhere near as bad as No Time To Die.
We paid our money to see the film, no one conned anyone.
And here you go: https://ourrescue.org/sound-of-freedom?gad=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwloynBhBbEiwAGY25dM_HJaxNVyVUI4bM4Nxn_EMX1X2XpUh8c8TPuIzou1uwKHrHfyqBrxoCdQMQAvD_BwE
They are taking donations to help stop child sex trafficking. I bet that’s more than you’ve ever done.
Also what do you know, they are even upfront about the stuff that was embellished for dramatic purposes. I don’t think anyone truly believes that Tim Ballard went on a Rogue Commando mission into the jungles of South America.
Except the tagline said it was BASED on a true story. You are strawmanning, the film never said it was 100% true. The stuff that happens to the children in the story does indeed happen to children in real life yet you people seem to want to discredit a film that informs people of the horrors of child sex trafficking and yes people from your side have said that the film is promoting QAnon conspiracy theories which means you think child sex trafficking is a QAnon Conspiracy Theory. There is no reason to be against this film unless you are a child molester.
Good for you, I’m glad you’re getting your virtue points out of your “UNICEF Ambassador work”, although for someone who claims to be spending so much time in 3rd world countries you sure are on here a lot. The film wasn’t a cash grab it was made to tell a story and bring awareness to what many children are experiencing in the world today. The fact that you people are triggered so badly by it is sick and disturbing.
You see women as pawns and sex objects, party of women my ass.
Also geez, you’d think the people working on the film would want people to go see it, I guess it’s just another “QAnon Conspiracy Theory”
So what have you done to combat child trafficking? I’m sure not much considering you think it’s a “QAnon Conspiracy Theory”. At least Tim Ballard has done something with his life.
Snake Surprise is better