MovieChat Forums > nooneimportant > Replies
nooneimportant's Replies
All the movie says is that child trafficking is bad, or are you trying to assert that child trafficking is a Q Anon conspiracy theory? If so you are a sick person.
Q Anon didn’t even exist when the movie was made, the truth is you people are trying to tie it to Q Anon because you’re sad and bitter that people liked it despite not pandering to your talking points and agenda. There is no reason to be against this film unless you are for child trafficking. Have you even seen it? Or did you just watch the Fake News analysis of it?
Show me one example from the film that perpetuates a “Q Anon conspiracy theory”. I’ll wait.
Don’t need to, I live in a state that doesn’t defund the police. I’m concerned about people who live in libtard run cities who don’t get police protection and the politicians who get tax payer funded security are releasing thugs and far left terrorists all so they can win elections and continue to victimize innocent people. You people don’t care about those who obey the law and do the right thing, you only care about thugs, drug dealers, rapists and insurrectionists, and trust me as soon as it ceases to become politically disadvantageous to be on their side you will cast them aside and forget about them just like you’ll eventually do to Dylan Mulvanny, Lia Thomas, George Floyd, etc.
I clearly explained the reason for bringing up “woke”, you either didn’t read my post or my post was too advanced for your reading level.
None of this would even matter if far left politicians weren’t releasing and refusing to prosecute violent criminals. All law abiding citizens want is the ability to defend themselves against far left thugs and terrorists. You don’t care about anyone’s life, all you care about is politicizing it. You’re a sick person.
Ordinary citizens under your plan: Won’t have police protection, can’t own guns, and have to put up with violent criminals being released/not prosecuted. I guess we just have to sit there and allow far left terrorists to kill us.
Also you have to take a ton of leaps in logic to blame victims of gun robbery on gun violence, but I guess that’s what you have to do to justify your poorly thought out and extreme radical narrative.
I didn’t say the movie had anything to do with woke, I said that woke Hollywood hates it because it doesn’t pandered to their far left woke ideology. Work on your reading comprehension.
Criminals will already have them due to far left pro-criminal policies. The only way that law abiding citizens even stand a chance is by owning guns. And whenever you take some kind of gun training course it is hammered into all the students that you are supposed to lock your guns up and have security systems. You’re totally ignorant on the subject.
Now that I’ve seen Oppenheimer these are my new Christopher Nolan Film Rankings:
01) The Dark Knight Rises
02) Interstellar
03) The Dark Knight
04) Memento
05) The Prestige
06) Inception
07) Batman Begins
08) Oppenheimer
09) Insomnia
10) Tenet
11) Dunkirk
Of course that’s what the DemoKKKrats do. When things don’t go their way they tell their mob to go kill and terrorize innocent people. But what’s worse about it is they are smug enough to try to justify it and then get on their moral pedestal whenever a conservative even does 1/100th of what they do on a daily basis.
All you’re proving is how low the left is willing to sink.
Yep let’s give up our guns and only allow violent criminals to have them. Then if someone breaks into my house and tries to kill me I should just sit down and discuss the situation with them nicely and go see a therapist.
Also you cited one example, it’s pretty judgmental of you to label all gun owners that way based off of one example that I’m sure you’ve twisted the facts on. Nice try, kiddo.
The film has nothing to do with “Q nonsense”. You’re attacking it for the actors private life and ignoring the real issue which is the horrors of child trafficking. You’re turning your back on child victims for political reasons, it’s sick.
SOF has nothing to do with Q Anon, you people just want to make it about Q Anon because you’re too blinded by your ideology to admit that a film that woke Hollywood rejected is actually good and is killing it at the box office despite a very low budget. You people make me sick.
So that means you don’t agree with the message that child abuse is bad?
It literally takes seven seconds to debunk the lies the far left has told about this film, or actually far left lies in general.
Q Anon literally didn’t exist when this film was made and even if it did, what difference would it make? Would it detract from the films message that child abuse = bad? The fact that you people aren’t rallying around that message is disturbing.
The movie has nothing to do with Q Anon. No one is trying to play the victim except for the left, no one is politicizing child trafficking except the left. All the movie did was say: Child trafficking = bad.
It’s pretty disturbing that the far left death cult seems to think that child trafficking is a Q Anon conspiracy theory. Ironically your post by itself is riddled with conspiracy theories.
RIP
Naw it’s not.