MovieChat Forums > nooneimportant > Replies
nooneimportant's Replies
You still haven’t fully explained how it “exploits” the topic. You haven’t even seen the film so you have no basis in which to claim that. I have seen the film and it is very much against child abuse. You are politicizing it because you don’t like the politics of the people involved which is 100% irrelevant to the topic. You people care more about politics than the victims of child abuse. It’s absurdly disgusting.
You’ve made your position quite clear. You are against a film that is against child trafficking because you don’t like the political views of some of the cast and crew members. Politics is more important to you and than stopping child abuse.
I clearly explained what I meant and I never even implied that the the mayor changed him because he funded the film. I said it wouldn’t surprise me if that turned out to be true. Are you trolling me? If you are it’s not funny.
The left is disproportionately going after this guy because he funded the film (and from what I understand it was a relatively small contribution). Yeah if he hadn’t funded the film it still might have made the news buried underneath Trump having too many scoops of ice cream and you people would have never gone after him with such enthusiasm. Be honest, you aren’t going after him because you are so passionate about stopping child kidnapping, you are going after him because you want to smear the film. You’re politicizing a huge travesty and atrocity.
I think you know what I mean by “you people”. And I already answered your question.
Also learn how to read, I never said that the Democrat mayor ordered his arrest because he was one of thousands of people funding the film. I said it wouldn’t surprise me if he chose to follow up on the arrest because he was funding the film and we also don’t know all the facts yet. It certainly wouldn’t have been front page news had he been one of the far left funders of the racial pornography documentary Everything is going to be all white.
I guess this means you’re too scared to answer the question. If you weren’t you would have answered it by now. I guess this also means you can’t point to a single example from the film that has anything to do with Q Anon
Your point being? Did they know about this when they accepted his money? How does this detract from the films message? How does this make the film a bad film? Are you disagreeing with any theme the film promotes? Are you now conceding that child kidnapping isn’t a “Q Anon conspiracy theory” but instead a very real and serious threat? What about everyone else who worked on the film who have squeaky clean records? Does this mean you are willing to apply the same standard to Alec Baldwin, Roman Polanski, Kevin Spacey?
The arrest of Fabian Marta has absolutely nothing to do with the film. Again you people are trying to slander the film because of the actions/political views of the people behind it. None of that has anything to do with the quality or the message of the film. I may despise Roman Polanski and Kevin Spacey yet Rosemary’s Baby and Se7en are still 2 of my favorite films ever. The difference is I’m a lot more mature and adult than you are.
Also we still don’t know all the facts, I wouldn’t be surprised if this was nothing more than a far left smear job. We all know that the left is willing to use the justice system to advance their lies and false narratives.
Everything you said was completely backwards. I’m not sure if you are lying or just really ignorant. Far left policies sink people into poverty, the rich get richer, the poor and the middle class get poorer. Republican policies are designed to lift people up, Democrat policies are designed to knock the middle class down.
“He definitely thinks that his opinion is the only one that matters”
That also goes for the vast majority of your cult.
You said that it was gun owners fault that criminals have guns. That’s a lie. All they were trying to do was protect themselves from far left terrorists that your cult seems to love releasing from prison. Since they can’t have police protection due to defund the police owning a gun is the only option. Also you do realize that criminals can get guns from other sources rather than stealing them from lawful gun owners?
The left were the ones who flipped out over a film exposing the horrors of kidnapping. They were the ones who chose to politicize this issue and this film. That’s why.
It’s pretty interesting that all of a sudden to the left child trafficking isn’t a “Q Anon conspiracy theory”. Even if all of these allegations are true it still wouldn’t detract from the films message. The left is playing politics with child abuse, it’s disturbing
Not deflecting at all, just pointing out your lies and false equivalences.
Too scared to answer the question?
Other countries also don’t tell thugs and criminals that it’s ok to torch cities, kill cops and that society owes them something. Other countries also don’t release far left terrorists from prison for political reasons. False equivalence on your part.
You never answered my question: are you admitting that I’m right that child sex abuse isn’t a “Q Anon conspiracy theory”?
All I did was respond to those saying that this a “Q Anon film”when it literally has nothing to do with Q Anon. Child trafficking shouldn’t be divisive yet thanks to the left here we are.
Fewer cars = fewer criminals with cars
That means police can catch them quicker.
See how that works? You car nuts are about giving criminals cars and then crying about them having cars.
You’re in favor of child abuse so what are you complaining about?
Also does this mean you’re finally admitting that child abuse isnt a “Q Anon conspiracy theory”?
So you have nothing further to contribute to this discussion?
Not really, I’m just an impartial, unbiased observer. You however are a far left, Trump hating radical who needs to see a therapist and get your head out of the sand. Everything I said was 100% factual, you however are just parroting the lies that the far left fake news is pumping into your brain.