MovieChat Forums > Skavau > Replies
Skavau's Replies
>But I was referring to when Obama was interviewed by Colbert and expounded about his fantasy of a third term in which he could direct a stand-in president from behind the scenes
This would be known generally, as a joke.
https://web.archive.org/web/20241103212701/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/us/politics/trump-pa-rally-election.html
So are you of the opinion almost every single contemporary medical researcher, virologist and doctor is comparable to Josef Mengele?
No. I don't hate any country. Or the Jewish diaspora, nor do I agree with the conspiracy theories about them dictating and controlling culture.
So zero ability to actually deal with the fact that you're praising an outright nazi apologist.
>Hitler was nominated for the Noble Peace Prize in 1939. He was very well liked apparently.
You mean 6 years after he had arrested and shut down and executed all political and social opposition to him within Nazi Germany?
No answer, as usual. Yes I'll trust the analysis of an actual doctor or researcher over a perennial conspiracy theorist.
"Things I don't like should be banned by the state"
Would this be the free speech you cheer so much for coming out again?
He's literally running apologetics for the nazis dude
It certainly gives them much more knowledge on the matter than "some guy".
I'd certainly take them more seriously than a guy who thinks vaccines cause autism, and that the COVID virus was engineered to avoid hurting Ashkenazi Jews and people of Chinese descent.
So at what point can you be called just an outright neo-nazi?
And how do you intend to enforce this? Employers may or may not blacklist or choose to not hire people based on their history, but you can't conscript it.
Did he? When did Obama say he should have ignored the 2016 result and remained in the White House (which is roughly comparable here)?
Ah back to your own stalking.
What point that was not made did I reply to? MovieLoader suggested that I thought everything made by the 'woke left' (as he says) is automatically good. This is simply never a claim I ever made.
My actual point (made 6 months ago) was that the left, or liberals, or progressives (choose your descriptor) dominate most forms of contemporary media and more broadly most post-war media when speaking in relative terms. The right, conservatives, reactionaries lag behind badly when it comes to highly-rated contemporary media output. This isn't the same as saying that all left/progressive-orientated media (or media made by those types) is inherently good, but that it's way more common and there are plenty of examples of it being considered good.
Can I say with equal veracity that you're pissed whenever you reply to me, or around me, as you do every day?
Because you're so utterly obsessed with me.
Open forum. And I'll take no lectures from you about stalking.
You continue to demonstrate your perpetual obsession with me online, and showcase your bizarre obsession and weird fanfiction you've made about people on here who you don't like.
You're in no position to accuse anyone of spending 24/7 anywhere given about half of your posts in the last year are about me.
>Just because an artist is "left wing" doesn't mean they always produce quality work. They are entirely capable of producing mediocre, derivative, yawn-inducing, agenda-driven, nauseating cheesy drivel.
I didn't say they did, but the right are even more non-existent in the entertainment field.
So you're just going to mimic Melton? Just going to spam the same shit over and over as if it's the funniest thing ever?