MovieChat Forums > VonFisch > Replies
VonFisch's Replies
I remember Barbara's parents visiting. I recall her father booming, "The girl should be the religion of her mother!" or something like that.
Sorry, I don't know what you mean by JEM.
A friend told me that Judy Blume did not consent until it was the right script or something like that. Otherwise, they would have made this movie a long time ago.
Do you remember Elise's occupation?
The egg scene was a flashback to when she was an actual high school student, not later undercover as an adult.
He never had the grassroots support and all his campaign financing has been from globalist corporate donors or extremely wealthy people that gave the limit and can't give anymore. The campaign is running out of money and it's a long way to the primaries and his numbers keep dropping.
LOL!
Thanks for the catch!
1. Spencer Tracy (1900-1967)
2. Gary Cooper (1901-1961)
3. Patsy Cline (1932-1963)
4. Buster Keaton (1895-1966)
5. Judy Garland (1922-1969)
6. Nat King Cole (1919 - 1965)
7. Otis Redding (1941-1967)
8. Brian Jones (1942-1969)
9. Marilyn Monroe (1926-1962)
10. Vivien Lee (1913-1967)
You sound emotionally stunted and your logic is absent.
It's a given that slavery is bad, it doesn't need a qualifier every time you teach something about it after initial definition. It's like saying, oh, by the way, Satan is evil. History also includes black people's lives after slavery. It's good they are teaching how they made it through, including the obstacles. I said this all before to Information Police last weekend.
No. I wore an N-95 at the height of the pandemic indoor public spaces. Only thing worth something against viruses.
I occasionally see people wearing masks while shopping. I don't know if all have a compromised immune system but they're either surgical or cloth masks.
Plant more trees.
Stop immigrating masses of the third world to first world countries in which they'll leave a larger footprint.
I think the pickle won that contest.
I would agree and also say it's her speaking voice also.
Same reason why to me Winona Ryder wouldn't be considered "sexy" either, because of the way she speaks in every role. She still sounds like the teenage girl in Heathers.
The "stakeholders" like Blackrock and Vanguard. Companies are beholden to them and not stock holders or customers.
I've seen the materials for CRT as well as many school board meetings of disturbed and outraged parents, many of which are minorities themselves, who have also seen the materials their child was learning at school or at home as well as the exercises.
It's almost like a method acting that CRT wants these kids to go through so it's more than learning this history but they must FEEL either guilt or as a victim now. Again, this is a toxic way of learning history that no child should have to endure. I'm glad many are ditching this.
It wasn't there when I learned and it's not needed now.
A chronological timeline in the manner I presented does not implicate guilt on one side you are supposing. It explains how things happened and the massacre was mentioned in the article you posted. To me, you would prefer an omission of that timeline but it wouldn't be telling the whole story how they used that event as an excuse for what they did.
If the question is what happened after slavery, then describing what some of the things the former slaves were able to do is certainly appropriate. It's a given understanding that their training all happened during enslavement. Some went into sharecropping, some that had been trained in certain trades were able to do so after slavery. What makes you think a child wouldn't understand that as I did?
There seems to be a difference in rationality here because there's really no other way to state what work they did that is their own after slavery.
I'd like to see what context this is being presented. Because sometimes the left wing hysteria is just that, an over reaction or trying to get people riled up.
For example, let's say, it is being presented, that some slaves were able to learn skilled trades and were able to take with them those skills to earn a living on their own. Like blacksmith or some such.
But the Left's reaction to this, if they weren't slaves, they wouldn't be learning these skills in the first place! How racist!
Whereas, I would see it as just stating a fact because somehow they evolved and many succeeded despite the burdens also after slavery.
Another article example, the Ocoee massacre. Someone stated it gives the impression that violence from the black people sparked it.
But what if it was presented as, during the violence, two white people were killed, which further enraged the posse to retaliate worse. I looked it up but have only scanned through but presenting a timeline of how events unfolded is being factual.
But the Left's reaction to this, you're blaming the black people for their massacre! Not true, and you can see by their actions what they did to the entire community does not fit any crime, and the killings were in a self defense against an onslaught. But in mentioning this, they are stating how things happened.
I do think the Left over-hypes to politically benefit themselves. But I'd like to see the context so there's no assumption.
The methods of CRT are very toxic as it imposes undeservedly negative feelings both sides and every child should be able to learn history while maintaining a positive self image and that of his classmates.
I did. I had found one of my papers from 3rd grade at my parents' house, with statements I had written about slavery and I think sharecropping, this was the 70's. So it was done without ill effects on my psyche but yet, no doubt that slavery and mistreatments were wrong.
6/10 because this rendition sounds like I should be sitting in a lounge with a martini and chatting with friends while she's singing in the background.
Karen Carpenter had an extraordinary velvety voice and very precise.
"I love her, man!"