MovieChat Forums > LetoAtreides > Replies
LetoAtreides's Replies
Yup. They screwed around and cancelled Trump's second term. Now he's back in force and will probably have his hands free to fix everything he couldn't in his disappointing first term. Democrats wouldn't have to worry about Trump today had they not cheated. Joke's on them.
She looks like she was born 50 years old. There isn't a single photo where she looks younger.
So 20 millions Americans cared about Biden vs Trump, but not at all about Harris vs Trump or Clinton vs Trump.
Old Joe was SOOOO awesome these 20 millions american couldn't resist voting in 2020.
Yeah Right...
https://www.delawareonline.com/gcdn/-mm-/b1a0707fa083879dc67c4841440e3015b4123a03/c=0-374-3745-2490/local/-/media/2017/06/26/Wilmington/Wilmington/636340820833333076-062617-BidenPool-SP729.JPG?
Explain this.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GbtTrFuWYBYiw-I?format=jpg
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pathetic
If the "better version" was just a younger version, then everybody would have recognized Elisabeth. She was a famous actress for her whole life, hence of the magazine covers and posters of her ranging from her 20s to 50s.
The accelerated aging or rotting of the finger, hand and leg Elizabeth suffers don't apply to Sue's body. So why would the young nurse carry on the damage of his older self?
It seemed like a device to make us realise the young male nurse is the pathetic old man inside the dinner. Which makes little sense. Why would his "better version" keep that huge birthmark on its hand? If it was body damage from staying longer than 7 days, then why would the young man have it while Sue doesn't get Elisabeth's damage bits?
It's not in the 80s, they use current cell phones. It's more like an alternate universe between now and the 80s.
https://i.postimg.cc/qR9vH0Ck/vlcsnap-2024-10-31-21h46m20s511.png
The biggest plot hole is how Elizabeth knows exactly where to stick the syringes and IV kits to inject or extract stuff without it being ever explicitly explained by the "official instructions".
The only way this could have worked as a movie is if the mother was gone for a whole day and then it was just the father trying to fix things while everybody is bothering him.
<spoiler>Kinda like that episode of Breaking Bad where they try to get rid of a body</spoiler>
Grotesquerie...never heard of it. Let's have a look...
https://ew.com/thmb/Z4qW3gt94xFC_uS2Ces1AnFKRks=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Grotesquerie-101624-02-2da08657da5344958cc05a407e241249.jpg
Nope.
Striptease and GI Jane were her desperate attempts to remain relevant in the late 90s. Her filmography is mostly bad movies except Ghost and A few Good Men.
If the size was so important, why did they cast an actress with small breasts?
I agree on the leads. Especially Mare...she's supposed to be young and attractive, but she already looks like an old lady. It doesn't work.
The tone is also all over the place, it goes from nearly being a comedy with the bunch of losers leaving the restaurant to cops being burned alive at a gas station.
When I saw it as a kid, I had no idea who Mickey Rourke was, he seemed like discount Bruce Willis.
He was planning to buy a pickup truck from an old guy after posting bail for his cousin. A lot of people who sell their used car prefer cash, especially older generations.
...and in female roles. As if we didn't know.
It nowhere near as brilliant as the first film, but it's a fascinating body horror/sci-fi movie with some of the best special effects and gore of the 80s.
The dog scene is still sad and disturbing 35 years later.
All the speculations on supposed plastic surgeries are based on blurry stills from her roles back when she was a teenager. Yeah right. She aged, that's all.
3 roles years apart. Same face and nose:
https://ew.com/thmb/X5uGp2qdKekJ5IR_TS__OB1F1qY=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/best-emma-stone-movies-022824-1b82b2a685bd42cc8ac408bce5d7466c.jpg