MovieChat Forums > MovieChatUser497 > Replies
MovieChatUser497's Replies
Show me one comment that I have made that’s “nuts”. Why would anyone “push back” against exposing the evil of child trafficking? Being against it makes you an evil person.
Look I’m not here to defend the Republicans, most of them are either corrupt or total cowards but they are far better than the modern day DemoKKKrats who are literally the epitome of evil. They are worse than the Nazis, and the Klan combined together.
I showed you many sources confirming that your cult is triggered by the movie. They even went as low as to claim that it’s “soft core porn for child molesters”
How would you know that if you haven't seen it? I have seen it and it's clearly against child abuse. Only a far left retard would mistake it for "soft porn for child molesters". It's odd, the film isn't that hard to follow so your misinterpretation of it is quite baffling. Oh well, no one ever accused your cult of being smart, derp derp
Libtard logic:
- Taking a stand against child molestation = “soft porn for child molesters”
It's against adults having sex with children, how stupid are you? And I'm sure you don't want to see it because it makes a huge portion of your cult rightfully look bad.
The film doesn't sexualize anyone, it's against child trafficking. It absolutely is beneficial for people to be aware because now if people are aware maybe we as a society can do something to stop it. But again you don't want to stop it because it helps your cult. Your cult however loves sexualizing children, you are some pretty sick people. Show me one scene from the film that "sexualizes" children. If you can't then man the hell up and admit you're a liar.
You're deflecting, whether or not what I do in my own life to stop child trafficking meets your standards is a non sequitur, the discussion is about why your cult is so offended by this film and so far all you've done is refuse to answer the question and spew out far left talking points all to get away from admitting you support child molestation.
Actually no, child abuse is not depicted in the film, it's implied but nothing is actually shown, maybe you should know WTF you're talking about before making an ass of yourself. My comparison is not silly, you said that since a pedophile (who you have yet to show me an example of) attended the film that means the film is in support of child molestation so therefore if a Nazi went to see Schindler's List that would mean Schindler's list was in favor of Nazism. Quit deflecting, man up and answer the question you low life.
Of course you won't watch it, you love living in your privileged little liberal bubble you gutless snowflake. Child sex trafficking shouldn't be something we should have to debate, it should be a black and white issue that it's bad, but you people are defending it which is beyond disgusting. If you don't want to see the film, then don't but quit your lies and your smear campaign because it's making you look more evil than you already are.
That's libtard logic for you:
- Allowing children to mutilate their own genitals is OK
- Exposing the horrors of child abuse is wrong (somehow???)
You seem to be getting quite rattled and triggered. You need to calm down, take a deep breath and realize that you are defending pedophilia. I’m not saying it’s your fault, your death cult probably just brainwashed you into hating this movie without even seeing it (which you openly admitted)
None at all. The left's constant bitchy and moaning over this film is beyond disturbing. Child sex trafficking shouldn't be an issue we should have to debate, any decent person would love this film and be against child sex trafficking but here we are. As soon as it looks like the left can't sink any lower they keep surprising up.
So because "right wingers" are against child sex trafficking that means the libtards are for it? What are you trying to say?
And the reason that people love this film is because it's good. No other reason. It's also no one's business why they may go to see it "10 times" or whatever shit you're spewing.
The left hates this movie because it makes one of their main voting bases look bad. They can't win elections without pedophiles and child molesters.
Please show me your data that says Sound of Freedom is a pedophile magnet. So far all I've heard are baseless speculation and assumptions. Also how does a pedophile going to see it detract from the message? You can deflect all you want but at the end of the day the film is exposing the horrors of child sex trafficking and your cult are the ones who have a problem with it.
So because pedophiles go to see a movie about the horrors of child trafficking that means that the movie is condoning child sex trafficking? WTF kind of retard logic is that? If Nazis showed up to see Schindler's List would that mean that Schindler's List is in favor of nazism?
No that just means school vouchers. Giving funding to charter schools doesn't mean defunding public schools. You're either retarded or a liar.
She consented to not engaging in "unGodly" behavior, it's her own damn fault.
Another lie, Republicans just want to give children who may not have had the opportunity to attend Charter Schools that opportunity instead of forcing them to stay in public schools that may be out of control with fighting, gang activity, drugs, etc. There's also a teacher shortage, it's highly probable that a child may not even have a teacher, they'll just be hooked up to a computer all day long "learning at their own pace". You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
Nothing but deflections. And if my children were mature enough I would be comfortable taking them. A 14 year old should be able to handle this, a 5 year old probably not. No I'm not comfortable with public masturbation however I'm sure most in the DemoKKKrat cult are OK with it seeing how they are apparently OK with child sex trafficking.
Again I'm an atheist so I really don't care what constitutes "godly" and "ungodly", what I do care about is people abiding by the agreements that they consented to which this teacher clearly isn't.
So all private schools will give poor people free admission if they want it? I didn't realize that, maybe you could back up your claims
Never said that, don't strawman me again dipshit. And it's not for you to determine who can and can't "fend for themselves"
I'm still waiting for proof of this so called movement within conservatives to "defund" public schools. You however want to tell an underprivileged child that if they happen to live in a district that has a terrible school that they have to stay there. You want to keep underprivileged people down, you're a horrible person.
points for other people's sacrifices
LOL, you believe in the magical sky daddy you deluded idiot. Also DemoKKKrats worship the Bible just about as much as Republicans.
So your school would not hire people you don't agree with, sounds like you're just as intolerant as you claim the school you are attacking is.
Wow I count at least 8 lies in your last post, that has to be some kind of record.
What if the poor student doesn't qualify for a scholarship? Generally scholarships are given to people who can play sports, play an instrument, etc. You are against poor people, you want to trap them in failing schools.
No one is trying to "defund public schools", you're deflecting and you still didn't answer my question.
If the people who wrote the policy consider it to be "ungodly" then the teacher violated the agreement. She agreed to such a "vague" condition so it's her own damn fault.
"Killing", actually it was the left who incited 574 violent BLM riots during summer 2020, ordered a hit on the SCOTUS and "MAGA Republicans"
"Guns", the left loves guns, just not in the hands of law abiding citizens. They love it when criminals have guns and when their tax payer funded security loves guns
"Racism", race is everything to the left, the right literally wants to move past it but the left doesn't because they want to milk it for all it's worth. Also you people literally elected an incontinent, incoherent racist who palled up with a former Klansman to keep schools segregated because he didn't want his children attending "racial jungles"
"misogyny" actually that's also the left, again you elected an incontinent, incoherent, misogynist who raped his daughter in the shower, turning her into a slut. You also elected a VP who literally started her political career by putting out for political favors.
"hate migrants" again not true, just against illegal immigration which the left loves so much. Ukraine's borders are sacred, but not ours, we have to let drug cartels, child traffickers, etc. in as long as they don't come from Cuba. The left wants to keep Cuban refugees out because they are escaping communism and probably won't vote for their cult
"Selfish", statistically speaking Conservatives are far more charitable than DemoKKKrats. DemoKKKrats are only charitable with the tax payers money. They don't want to make sacrifices but are fine taking credit and virtue
https://radio.foxnews.com/2023/07/12/the-sound-of-freedom-triggers-the-left/
You were saying?
Here are some more:
https://www.outkick.com/medias-insane-attacks-on-sound-of-freedom-speak-volumes/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-lefts-problem-with-exposing-child-traffickers
They even were retarded enough to call it a Qanon film even though it was filmed before Qanon was even a thing.
You didn't answer my question, also it's pretty judgemental of you to make sure a blanket assumption about all "wealthy parents". Maybe there are parents who want to send their kids there but can't afford it? I thought you people had a monopoly of compassion for the poor? I guess not.
Well obviously their boss did and they consented to the standard so your poorly thought out premise/lies don't have a leg to stand on here.
Who knows? And I doubt you do either.
Here you go: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10929171/Tucker-Carlson-blasts-Joe-Biden-setting-FBI-woman-sold-Ashley-Bidens-diary.html
I thought the "party of women" would be more concerned about this? I guess that was all a lie.
Your issue is with school policy. According to you she was fired for something that she new was against school policy. Stop deflecting, dingleberry. “Wealthy parents want their private schools subsidized by tax payers”, first of all I have no idea how you can make such a broad, sweeping statement about all “wealthy parents”, secondly I would love to see your citation for that assertion.
Red POS standing by
A better movie would have been better.
While I hate seeing one of my favorite characters get totally annihilated I still gotta say it’s pretty hilarious watching Disney drown in their own shit.