MovieChat Forums > TheHungryHippo > Replies
TheHungryHippo's Replies
Doesn't matter who edited it, I provided 3 related things. Your definition doesn't say anything about who has to edit it. Now answer my question, which of the following is true?
A) BOTH LOTR and Pulp Fiction are trilogies
or
B) NEITHER LOTR or Pulp Fiction are trilogies
Can't weasel your way out of this one kid.
Actually I did edit it, I found the appropriate clips and arranged them in the correct order and split it into its 3 separate segments, despite the fact that was never in your definition to begin with.
Now again I want an answer: Are they BOTH trilogies or are NEITHER? It's one or the other kiddo.
Until you define what cultural impact is anything else you say is pointless. If you can't even define your argument then how am I supposed to respond? Sounds like you didn't think this through very well.
Sorry your definition says nothing about being released to the public. It just says three related things and I posted 3 related things.
Stop making stuff up and stop moving the goal post. Your definition said nothing about it having to be my edit. Was LOTR your edit??? Didn't think so. Although by your logic you just admitted LOTR isn't a trilogy so thank you.
You can't even define cultural impact so how am I supposed to answer your question??? You can't even find an objective, quantifiable definition, you're just making stuff up.
Nope it was posted in 3 parts as you requested. I have satisfied your definition. Now are both of them trilogies or neither. It's one or the other, which one?
I knew they would do this, after what Disney did with Star Wars it’s abundantly clear they care more about promoting feminist/SJW propaganda instead of telling a good story.
Apparently you are just too lazy to copy and paste. Also your definition didn’t say anything about being clickable
So it can only be a trilogy if I personally edit it? Thanks you just debunked LOTR as a trilogy
Considering you can’t even define cultural impact or explain how you determine it I don’t know how I’m supposed to answer that
Now answer my question are they both trilogies or neither?
No you said I had to post the three segments which I did. Your definition said nothing about being released to the public. Now answer the question are they both trilogies or neither?
I'm willing to allow you to back out of having to admit Pulp Fiction is a trilogy as long as you admit LOTR isn't.
Also I am not entertaining any more of your deflection until you answer the following:
Which is true?
A) BOTH LOTR and Pulp Fiction are trilogies
OR
B) NEITHER LOTR or Pulp Fiction are trilogies.
There are no other options now according to your own definition, which is it?
So now the question is this: Are BOTH LOTR and Pulp Fiction or trilogy or are NEITHER???
I'm not letting you off the hook so don't get your hopes up bitchboy.
Links work fine and your definition didn't say it had to be clickable.
Again OFOTCN ass raped LOTR at the Oscars which according to you meant the most, at least it did when you were trying to prop up LOTR. Hypocrite????
Until you demonstrate that IMDB equates to "cultural impact" you have nothing.
Naw naw naw, don't try to backpedal, your definition said nothing about being released theatrically. I just "posted" my Pulp Fiction Trilogy, in 3 different parts just as you requested and I think it's safe to say they are "3 related things"
There you go, I have satisfied your definition of a trilogy!