MovieChat Forums > Branson26 > Replies
Branson26's Replies
More votes for a successive election is expected. There was only one presidential election since 2000 where there was a decline in votes between successive elections.
Biden's votes clash with the last comparable election:
Obama had a 3.9% popular vote differential in 2012 for 332 electoral votes. Biden had 4.5% popular vote differential in 2020 for just 306 electoral votes. We expect Biden to have more electoral votes than Obama based on their popular vote differentials. It's far more likely that they boosted Biden's popular vote to facilitate the steal.
More garbage straw man by you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election
Your figures are wrong.
You're spouting garbage straw man. It's not that Trump got more votes from the previous election. It's that Biden did what no candidate in US history could do: I wonder what a fraud election looks like?
That's not true. Trump had 46.1% of the popular vote in 2016 vs. 46.8% in 2020.
He didn't maintain support? Trump gained 11M votes.
Biden was such an idiot he failed his own metric to be president, talk about failure:
"BIDEN: 220,000 Americans dead. If you hear nothing else I say tonight, hear this. Anyone who’s responsible for not taking control — in fact, not saying, I take no responsibility, initially — anyone who is responsible for that many deaths should not remain as President of the United States of America."
https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/october-22-2020-debate-transcript/
They all lost support. Trump gained support.
Applicable elections in this case are elections involving an incumbent. Biden is the only candidate in US history to somehow defeat an incumbent who maintained support.
No VP has ever refused to certify the results of the official electoral vote count? Why would precedent matter, when the 2020 election went against all other applicable elections in US history?
All presidents are. Next.
No one cares about the president? You need to take a break from the internet.
I've got some bad news: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F08%2F01%2Fbiden-campaign-prisoner-swap-00172408&psig=AOvVaw0ekaelpFpu0Bhfx6giIvZI&ust=1729647357592000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBQQjRxqFwoTCOCghNjsoIkDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE
That's not racist. This is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVD17hg4O7o
Nobody but MAGA cares about Harris working at McDonald's? Kamala and Democrats obviously care because they are the ones who actively publicized it. Why are libs so clueless?
Sounds like a personal problem for Pelosi? Your argument failed. Go whine to Pelosi for not protecting the Capital.
Why would Nancy Pelosi would take responsibility for Trump's supposed security failures?
Jason can crush a skull with hands; he is a weapon.
The problem is there is no connection to compare Jason's size. He doesn't even have the same outfit/mask which further confuses the issues.
There is every reason to think that will happen. Democrats simply have too much invested to allow Trump back into the White House.