whoanelly's Replies


Any idea, now, who that was? Thanks for posting this! I like them all. They each have things that I enjoy: 1996 cinema version starring Gwyneth Paltrow 1996 Meridian Television Kate Beckinsale version 1972 - BBC miniseries starring Doran Godwin. There’s also Clueless from 1995 starring Alicia Silverstone. It’s modernized and loosely based on Austen’s novel. If you can’t find them streaming, try your public library's DVD collection. I agree. I enjoyed it very much, although I would have enjoyed it with 2 or 3 fewer time jumps. I also own the 90s version— one of the few films I watch every year. I think the newest version is a nice addition to the canon. And like someone else pointed out in another thread, I believe classics should be re-adapted each generation. Totally! I was out in Dansko clogs yesterday and could barely keep my balance! No, she cooks lots of stuff. She made chili when the Essex crew came to stay in Barry (except for Pam, who had “cauliflower with a bit of onion” lol). Making omelets is her thing. There’s a cute little “behind-the-scenes” featurette about her omelet-making. It’s a special feature on the s1 dvd. (Back when s1 premiered on BBC you could watch the omelet featurette on youtube.) I love this program! I binge it a few times a year. I agree that Gavin and Stacey aren’t really the main couple; they’re more like devices for Smithy and Nessa. Both Smithy and Nessa have ott personalities. They’re extremely needy for attention, constantly exhibiting attention-seeking behavior. It’s such a hoot to watch! They had the best one in 2009, too. 12 Men of Christmas was their headliner that hear and easily beat out anything on Hallmark. Kristen Chenoweth, Josh Hopkins and Anna Chlumsky were all so fun. I think the tribute to Arthur would have taken place whether or not he attended. Maybe that’s the wardrobe she wears to the Vail Film Festival. Bozo_500 said: “(a significant reason why he was exposed anyway)“ Not imo. Thanks for the tip; just watched it via hulu. Thanks for that. I watched the trailer just now and at first, it made me want to watch the film, but by the time it ended, I felt as though I’d already seen everything. No need to watch the movie. To Die For is a fictional film based on the Greg Smart murder. The portrayal of the murder victim and his family in TDF is totally unlike Greg Smart and his family. Same here. In fact, I quit watching the moment Buckley died. It felt so tacked-on and was out of character with the rest of the film. Count me among the disappointed. What Nelson project? Sadly it doesn't look like anyone is inspired to pick up the novel series where this program left off. Women could, indeed, inherit property. Scatcherd wanted to leave his property to his heirs in the next generation. It was his way of making certain it passed to his own bloodline. If he had left it to his wife, she could have disposed of the property some other way, including donating it to the church if she had so wanted. Scatcherd made generous provision for his widow in his will. She would have lived in comfort and luxury for the remainder of her life.