MovieChat Forums > SuperVillain > Replies
SuperVillain's Replies
It just sucks because of the way it's done. Both those characters get great chase scenes, but in their subsequent films, they are so quickly dispatched you don't really get enough of a reaction from a survivor that the killer is back. They react just like everyone else with a quick 2-3 second death scene.
I like how you get to see Kristin dismantle knowing Freddy is back in Nightmare on Elm Street 4 before she becomes one of his victims...hell Nancy gets to the end before she bites it in 3.
Michael using a car as a weapon kinda threw me off.. And yea everyone outrunning that car was ridiculous but Michael has many times before played with his food. He's got all Halloween night, plus the man in black plot armor would show up once shit got too hairy anyway. ;)
You know...I never realized that...that does make a difference for me..
Thanks :]
I'll admit I never understood why Tina was such a hated character in this franchise that just got more glum as it continued. I thought she was fun and lighthearted but she's also supposed to be portraying a high school student, so it makes sense that for such a vivacious free girl she would become reluctant and abrasive in the face of abrupt responsibility. Plus, she hadn't had the real Michael experience yet. Hell, she more than made up for it by giving her life. I actually hoped she would make it, because we got to see her go through an arc where she wasted no time in trying to rescue Jamie when she knew shit got real.
I HEAVILY dislike that this movie kills Rachel honestly, but Tina was a fun character I thought would end up just being a body bad, but she became a heroine...in a body bag.. and now that the second and third heroine died in the same movie and the bad guys got Jamie, this movie left me kinda drained with all efforts made in vain tbh.
The ending is just Michael breathing in that delicious, buttery box office goodness.
Great write up Gorch, haven't seen the film all the way through in a while but I thought she was asking "Was that the boogeyman?"
Thank you for taking my post more in jest than ridicule. :]
Early on in the film, when the patients are being processed before the transfer, the Dr. says that he's on Michael's side.. and I was immediately taken back by how blatant that was.. plus he just acting suspicious the whole time. Why would he allow some journalists to come fuck with some crazy serial killer? How did he survive the bus crash? Why is he allowed to join the lieutenant without divulging what happened on that bus first? (And gets to sit in the front seat?) Why does he keep doing whatever he wants no matter how many times the lieutenant tells him not to.. I thought they were trying to make it obvious and a tad comical that he'd betray them at some point.
It is insanely feminist! And hypermodernist. Pretty nihilist attitude towards men.
By the very end, all the women are alone and single! They don't need any man at all!
--You can't be serious... how is this movie at all feminist.. the script requires everyone to be stupid at the right parts.. and at the end the 3 women together didn't put down the man; Michael, anyway. Should we read into this that not even 3 women with guns can't stop a man?
"I was actually surprised by the new psychiatrist being nuts. I did NOT see that coming!"
Lool really? Were you just not paying him any attention up until that point?
Right? I wanted to see actual peanut butter on actual penis.
I believe his eye damage s from the the hanger Laurie stabbed him with.
Now if you actually typed up what complaints were trivial and why you thought they were trivial, we could have a real discussion instead of all this unnecessary melodrama.
I had to leave the reddit discussion thread because most people don't respond to the criticisms, they mostly downvote and make new posts about how people whine too much and how they couldn't understand how others didn't like it. We don't have to be at each other's throats, it's just a movie.
"See, nobody can be happy, anymore! This is what I'm talking about."
"Everyone is ungrateful; End of story!"
These are very dumb statements. Many people, including yourself, were happy about this film. This is a discussion thread, instead of shutting down people who disliked the film like a bratty child, why don't you discuss exactly what made them dislike it. Certain scenes affect others differently. Seeing the original Halloween at a time where a film like that was still frightening (age they saw it as well) and less cheesy, amidst its own flaws, might affect your viewing (dis)pleasure in a Halloween sequel.