MovieChat Forums > PeppermintHippo > Replies
PeppermintHippo's Replies
Do you always let the opinions of strangers influence you? Your parents must be real proud that they raised such a weak minded little boy.
I literally said nothing of what just blithered out of your face.
That’s where you’re 100% wrong, the character already existed the last time I checked and the prequels were apart of the saga, it wasn’t a remake so no....McGregor doesn’t get to change the character just because he was a miscast and can’t act like another person.
Look, it’s no different from a Biopic...if you’re portraying a real person or a character that already exists in the same saga/franchise/series then they sure as shit better honor who they’re portraying, period.
Your acting argument holds no water because it’s supposed to be the same character in parts 1-4, it’s so obvious that the two performances aren’t the same.
He looks nothing like Obi Wan, he doesn’t speak like Obi Wan, and he doesn’t act like Obi Wan. He’s literally the worst part of the prequels, but impressionable folks like yourself like to go along with the crowd I guess.
Says the guy who wants an obi wan Movie with “I can’t act” Ewan Mcgregor.
The Incredibles is animated though, isn’t it aimed at kids? Also I don’t like Craig T Nelson and it has no eye candy for me so no thanks.
Nah that movie is boring to me, I much prefer dinosaurs and Star Wars
The movie doesn’t need a sequel, it’s perfect the way it ended.
It’s so mediocre that you took time from your busy day to log onto this website and make your opinion known, just in case people didn’t know. 😂
Uneventful? Please provide phone numbers to everyone who used this word or else I know you’re lying.
This is the best Star Wars movie since Empire and that’s a fact.
The only person playing mind games is you with your tin foil hat, throwing all sorts of accusations at my feet, and delving into my psychology. You almost seem jealous of ‘Solo’ at this point, you’re a bitter contrarian to the bitter end eh?
You said that it was forgettable, your words, not mine. I’m just wondering why you are here. If I saw a movie that was forgettable I wouldn’t go to some barely known message board site and waste my time discussing it. That’s illogical behavior if you ask me, wouldn’t there be a better use of your time?
If it’s so forgettable then why are you discussing it on some random message board right now? Didn’t really think your argument through did ya? Hehe
Nothing like it? Lol
Metropolis is the grandfather of Science Fiction films, we owe everything to it, not Blade Runner. Also you must not be very familiar with Hong Kong cinema, it’s what influenced the look of Blade Runner and many aspects of the Matrix.
Heck, Total Recall is a greater influence on The Matrix than Blade Runner ever was.
Also it’s not true that tinkering didn’t take place before Blade Runner became a cult classic. Initial audiences hated the original cut of the movie so the studio added a bunch of Harrison Ford narration and tacked on a bizarre happy ending and poof...we got the theatrical cut. Scott realized that none of the cuts were good enough so he kept creating more to fix plot holes and gaps in logic.
Solo on the other hand is a movie ahead of its time and will be remembered in the next 100 years, Blade Runner is already on the verge of being forgotten.
Just watch any Ron Howard movie and it’s obvious that he’s a closeted conservative. Either that or it’s just a coincidence that he signs on to direct these right leaning films.
What ground did blade runner break? Were there a slew of similar movies following its release? If it was so special and great then why did the movie need 5 cuts? You seem to be living in a dream world Neo, the movie was okay at best but I do admit it has a cult following.
Solo is a pro Trump movie, so I don’t see how it would have a SJW or progressive agenda. Ron Howard is a huge Republican at heart.