MovieChat Forums > PeppermintHippo > Replies
PeppermintHippo's Replies
What evidence? This is a “he said” vs a “she said” case. Cosby gave her party pills and she willingly took them knowing the consequences....until she regretted it later and cried rape. It’s not such a cut a dry case but I could see how Cosby thought he had the consent to have sex with her.
It’s not my job to provide evidence of a negative, I wasn’t there in the bedroom with Bill Cosby and [insert female accuser here] so how should I know? What is google gonna tell me? Probably some Liberal spinster lie but who knows.
That would be true if I thought the movie stunk but outright lied about it, but exaggerating isn’t really a crime now is it? What I’m doing is no different from the regulars who visit these boards and exaggerate how bad a particular movie is, either they are liars or they exaggerate a bit. Most likely the latter but I stand by my story that I’m a contrarian.
The 60+ women you mention are all liars, every last one of them. You know how I know this? It’s because they waited until after the first accusation came out and jumped on the “let’s get famous bandwagon”.
As for the original accusation, she admitted to willingly entering the house and accepted a drink from him which is consent where I come from. I understand that she regretted giving consent after the fact but Bill didn’t really commit any crime based on the weak evidence I’ve heard.
How many black people were in Solo? Was Two too much? Ohhhh Lordy
Jury’s often get it wrong though, just look at the OJ trial.
That’s a lot of hearsay and circumstantial evidence you provided. Where is the smoking gun? Is there footage of the sexual assaults taking place or maybe a hidden audio confession?
As for the amount of women coming forward I’m not impressed, we know that when women wait years before coming forward that it’s usually BS enlightbof the “me too” movement that’s swept the nation.
Okay so maybe I’m exaggerating a bit but it’s a solid 6/10. Nothing to write home about, but good enough to recommend. I’m no troll, more of a contrarian or provocateur I think.
Bump 😎
I like how people like yourself are so out of touch with reality lol.
Why did Solo lose money? This question is so easy to answer that I’m almost embarrassed to have to explain it to you.
The reason Solo was a box office bomb was because 4 Star Wars movies came out within 3 years of each other.....it was the unlucky 4th movie in which audience fatigue finally kicked in. It had nothing to do with the quality of the movie or Kathleen Kennedy....the stupidity of Star Wars fans continues to amuse me.
The Prequels were terrible, TFA was at worst a decent movie, Rogue One was dreadful, The Last Jedi was a hot mess......but Solo is the best Star Wars movie since Empire Strikes Back, in fact it blows away A New Hope and Return of the Jedi easily. Those are the facts!!!
Ron Howard > Brad Bird
This simply cannot be argued.
You smell bad, take a shower please. 🚿
I decide what movies to see by what my Grandpa tells me, I respect my elders.
Adults with brains would choose the two I mentioned. 😎
It’s the only Hellraiser movie that makes logical sense from start to finish, also Katheryn Winnick is a sex goddess so yup. 👍🏻
What was terrible about the story? Please be specific and provide detailed examples of how you would fix it.
I’m not sure you know what that word means lol.
Name me 3 Horror Movies you thought were good in the last 5 years...I need to know if you’re a troll or not....thanks 👍🏻
The internet said you’re lying, so it must be true.
Why can’t they have new icons and still make sequels to older ones? Your argument is one huge logical fallacy.
Hellraiser: Hellworld for example is the best of that franchise so no....these movies shouldn’t end prematurely.
Leprechaun in the Hood is the best of that franchise....again thank goodness they didn’t listen to you there.
“Legacy” is just a made up word that holds no bearing in reality. Most sequels are better than the original anyways.