MovieChat Forums > ketaset84 > Replies
ketaset84's Replies
Exactly! I literally felt better about life when those credits rolled
For real brother; was with u, but you can't argue with that. He's got you there! Maybe work a little harder to ruin this medium, progress to absolute futility. Etc etc etc.
Perfectly said, I completely agree. Chances are youll never get to see this reply (7 yrs later).... But goddamn was it refreshing finally coming across some fucking concise and realistic (an also elegantly written) review. Instead of the surrounding cesspool of one note bovine american/dullards spewing the same the same single sentence screed; ironically shining thru as the very one-note blatent souless charictor that is the very core of the films failure.
Forgive the grammatical nightmare above luckily they're probably never be read anyway but but it's nice seeing some arguments for consciousness every now and then can I see a lunacy .
Cheers!
Ps. But... You're obviously a pedophile and completely deranged etc etc etc. Blah blah. Bwhahaha! Lol. These fuckin lunatics
Feel the same way
Thank you!! An argument for conciousness seemed imperative when I saw post headline. Didn't know she got a Razzie nom, but well deserved. Between her actual material to work with and output, it took very little time to be come infuriated & annoyed beyond belief with character etc. Choking on rage from unrealistic stupidity is about as worst as one can get from a movie experience.
Haha finally some1
First thing I thought of was that Marla woman was how freaking old is she. She was 8 in 1971 she didn't look 58 but then again it seemed obvious fit HBO purposely did not get into too much detail with every testimony in person or else they wouldn't have an actual feature to present.
I agree with both of you if I had to make a choice McCoy is the most likely one, tho I will say, that aside from that Old Woman Jo's definitive Geronimo explanation that story had the 2nd most possibly convincing and if not alluring mysterious element that seemed intriguing. sorry for the grammatical nightmare above I should have chose a better time to reply back to this not using voice to text.
Did either of y'all find yourself asking a lot of questions that actually could have been mentioned throughout the whole documentary? But I suppose such a question can answer itself if I do read the second sentence that I mentioned here...
I would have been far happier if HBO did the hacky kind of thing reading it out into two or three episodes but at least revealed certain facts the viewer no doubt is asking throughout each person's testimony. It was as if they were purposefully lazy or with holding a lot of stuff just to help sell the initial product
hey u still offering acess to ur fanedit of enter the avoid? plz let me kno. Some1 sent me there fanedit yrs ago; I was greatful and assured them I would let them know what I thought, but soon after had a HD fail and lost all traces.
I wonder if you were that person. I want to say it was original thru the fanedit site.
The site was extremely more free & open @ the time, cuz Ive since revisited like 2 months ago and was shocked how its basically just a catolgue of Fanedits that have been made
(basic details, zero links or instructions to any, and also heavy warnings about not even slightly requesting any).
Kinda turned me off completely from further browsing the once great site/forum. So many "Forums" are becoming the opposite of what their purpose / greatness is.... Lame!!! Thanks for listening if nothing else. Cheers!
Hit the nail on the head. Thats exactly how I felt. Would have worked as 30+ (45 max) minute Short. At least in my opinion. cheers ya'll
ya Ive seen 3 dif trailers , all completely dif. Original one I saw; like urself I didnt catch any of the manson thing. ya the "I'm sharon tate" line obviously gave a forced correlation of Manson to the mind, but otherwise complete comedy fun theme going on.
The other was complete opposite and dark, focusing mostly on manson fam/tate murder. An the last was a even mix of the two. Christ are they trying to sell tickets I guess.
It sure is funny how a trailer can really be complete double edge sword for so many movies, at least in my own experience.... much like the picture that can make the pretty look ugly (an vice versa) etc.
Sry for grammatical nightmare, but saw ur comment and felt the same thing, ur not crazy!!!
Cheers
another day in paradise is the title, but touche for at least listing something dif outside the same 3 movies list over yrs above this comment. But no1's reading this anyway.