MovieChat Forums > FilmBuff > Replies
FilmBuff's Replies
There you go again, sounding creepy. What does anyone's girlfriend have to do with their opinion about Rachel Zegler.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Apparently you find them attractive. It seems many men don't, maybe even most men. Neither of them appeals to me at all, and based on most of the posts here, I'm not alone in thinking this.
You aren't making any sense. What does Tam's partner, if he/she even has one, have to do with this? An unattractive actress was cast to play a character defined by her beauty, which continues a trend of unattractive actresses being given leading roles. It's not unreasonable to point this out. Or do you think only men who have beautiful girlfriends should be allowed to speak their opinions?
And it isn't as if access to abortions is gone, despite Roe v. Wade being overturned. The number of women getting abortions in the U.S. went up in the first three months of 2024 compared with before the Supreme Court's verdict.
So you'd prefer World War 3 to Russia taking back Ukraine?
I'd vote for her, but in 2036. Let's give Vance two terms first. Then Tulsi and Vivek can duke it out, and we can elect one of them.
So is Trump. So are most Americans. It's great if you aren't, and I can't fault you for that point of view, but it may not be tenable in a candidate for the presidency.
It's something of a puzzling irony, but even though it's clear that the majority of Americans support Trump, it's still social suicide to let that be known. The majority doesn't penalize those who openly support Harris, and tend to have a live and let live outlook, but the same can't be said of the left. People on the left will end friendships, cut ties with family, and boycott a business.
As for my left-leaning friends, they are bummed out and afraid of non-existent problems. They worry that blacks will be lynched, trans people euthanized, and women barred from having abortions. There's no use in even trying to explain the facts to them, as they take their position on faith the same way a Muslim or a Yankees fan takes theirs. Even if Trump has outstanding success and lowers inflation, creates jobs, ends wars, and balances the federal budget, in four years they'll proclaim that we must elect whatever candidate the Democrats run in order to save America.
What possible rationale can you have for that statement? The U.S. has zero business in Ukraine.
Zelensky needs to find himself a new sugar daddy. His days of laundering money for American billionaires is over.
You know as well as everyone else that the trial was a sham, and nothing more than the latest in an unceasing line of attempts to block his path to the White House that date back to 2016. It was lawfare, plain and simple.
Rather than go along with the charades being propagated by the state-run media-- Trump is a felon! Trump is a racist! Trump is a Russian agent! Trump is a fill-in-the-blank!-- think for yourself. Always be open to the truth, even, and I'd argue especially, when it flies in the face of your current beliefs.
If you are incapable of changing your mind on a subject then you don't have a valid reason for your belief in the first place. No belief should be beyond rejection if evidence comes along that challenges it.
You should see what I write about Jaws: The Revenge.
I guess my joke was too convincing. I was trying to describe the worst possible sequel to Godzilla Minus One!
Hopefully he can bring Ghidorah, Rodan, and Mothra into this one. It might make sense to introduce extraterrestrial life sooner than later, since that's a recurring theme. Maybe seemingly friendly aliens from space show up with Ghidorah as a way to stop Godzilla, but turn the tables once Godzilla has been eliminated, but of course, Godzilla comes back to save the day in the final reel, with help from his two flying friends.
I'm pretty sure RFK Jr. would like to know who killed his uncle. I'd also like to see what data on the assassination has been kept hidden for 60+ years.
It's very likely Trump will release the names of those known to have spent time on Epstein's island.
I blocked him long ago, but that reads like he's being sarcastic.
I doubt that very much. Why would she create a fake account devoted to trash-talking her, calling her a tranny and a hooker, and posting 100 times a day with insane drivel? When you look at her social media, it's very limited, and there is no indication whatsoever she's even pursuing acting. She seems like your run-of-the-mill 20-something, and Less Than Zero has for some reason become obsessed with her.
Never say never, but it strikes me as nearly impossible that they are the same person.
As to the original post, +1 without a doubt. The dude is a step away from shooting up a movie theater and someone who knows him needs to stage an intervention.
She's just toeing the party line. She probably doesn't stop to consider the negative effects of what she's doing.
You may not find it funny, but it definitely appealed to most at the time. For years after this ran people everywhere quoted this skit.
That's answered in the film, though in a nuanced way that goes over the head of many viewers. If you can't handle an art house film like this, stick to the Transformers movies.
What specifically are you worried about? Everything he's said so far has been positive, in my opinion.