MovieChat Forums > CriticalCatalyst > Replies
CriticalCatalyst's Replies
A cover up would not be necessary. The police would take the case before a Grand Jury. No jury in the country would indict Gus for the murder of a man (Malvo) who had caused so much mayhem. I mean Malvo killed thirty some people. This is very plausible and likely what would happen in real life.
Rachel had a baby
That’s the whole movie
Everything else was fluff
It did suck, and I really wanted to like it.
You’re not missing anything. They’ve gotten progressively dumber with each sequel. People walk out of the theatre dumber than when they walked in.
I thought it was strange that they arrested him at the scene. I would conduct a more thorough investigation and taken it through the Grand Jury and let them decide what to do.
I hear ya. Same thing with Tasers. They don’t knock people out in real life. As soon as the current stops you are fully functional...and pissed off.
You’re absolutely right they should. In big cities, however, local and federal agencies often avoid each other like the plague.
I know. I’d like to hear from someone who has read the book to see if more insight into this is given in the book.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who thought that. The inner dialogues are what made this book great.
“Cold waves lap Gotham Harbor, like they have all the time in the world.”
“It takes nearly a minute to fall from this height, and despite what you may have heard, you’re likely to stay conscious all the way down. Thoughts like that keep me warm at night.”
Not surprised at all. I give ZERO credence to professional critics opinions. If I want to look movie reviews up I always look at user reviews. Professional critics always have an agenda.
I would say no, it’s not necessary. But there is a lot of lore and references to the movies/ tv shows. The core story, however, stands on its own.
Jury’s still out for me. All the characters are weird and very few are actually likable. It just doesn’t feel like Fargo. Something’s missing.
I get what you’re saying, but man it’s fallen apart at least twice. You Dinn's got some credits stored away. Think he needs to splurge on a new ride.
What kind of dumb @ss question is that? He’s just a toddler, he doesn’t know any better. He just knows he likes the taste of frog.
What are you talking about?? Did you not take your Ritalin today?
The movie is a remake, plain and simple. Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot. I don’t care what Sam Raimi says, have you ever considered that maybe he said that to mess with viewers??
1. Why would Ash go back to the same cabin after everything that happened in the first film?
2. When he finds the tape recorder and the book he acts like it’s the first time he’s seen it.
3. If he knew what the book and the tape recorder contained (and if it’s a sequel, he would) then wouldn’t have touched either with a ten foot pole.
4. Does the bridge magically repair and destroy itself when it’s convenient for the story.
Well if that’s the case who blew Raynor’s head off? That was several episodes prior to Cindy’s first sighting? She was presumably still locked up at that point.
You know you may be right. Remember he touched the blood in the hotel room because he was curious? Maybe he pointed the gun at the floor and pulled the trigger because he was curious. He had probably never handled a firearm before.
But what about the gunshot?
I haven’t read the comics, but I was thinking the drowning/death loop for hundreds of years would make her insane. Maybe she’s dragged up by some fishermen or marine biologists and she becomes the villain in the next movie.
I just figured he maybe an appointment got cancelled and he showed up early.