OvertonPendulum's Replies


Compared to What. Name me an ethnic group that did not have slavery. Of course not. Whites were the first in the world to end slavery. They ended slavery both in America and in Africa as well as other colonies around the world. Just about everyone practiced slavery. Had Whites not bought existing slaves from Africans, those slaves would just remain slaves in Africa. In your dreams. There is cultural backlash. Elon is buying Twitter and right wingers are about to be allowed to speak. The fight isn't over yet. Even if the director himself doesn't believe in diversity and inclusion, that is still what is expected from a Hollywood major movie nowadays. He has to tow the line. It's ideological. Not always but generally they are. Unless you can show me that Hollywood doesn't believe in diversity and inclusion. Generalizations do count when talking about patterns. Unless you can show me my generalization is incorrect and Hollywood doesn't believe in diversity and inclusion. Both of these ideologies are evil and don't belong in Europe. In fact they don't belong in the world. No they don't because they fear of being called racist. I never mentioned Matt Reeves. I am taking about Hollywood's open ideology of "diversity" and "inclusion". This is no secret. Those that suck too much don't. Those that are average get more positive reviews because the critic fear being called racist. It wasn't a hit critically. Critics don't dare give a movie like Black Panther a negative review because they will perceived as being racist. No you didn't. N ope, wrong again. They admit it. Ok if you don't care I do care. Blacks are better players than Whites. Box office doesn't change the fact there isn't a single rich Black country in the world and that Black Panther was invented by a liberal White who feels sorry for Blacks. No you haven't explained how it is objective. Just because the race isn't essential doesn't mean the swap wasn't ideological. You can ignore it, but the viewers will see it. Nothing you can do about that. What point? Yes, you need liberal Whites to invent a fictional rich Black country so you can feel better about yourselves, because there isn't such a country in the entire world. Whites who hate Whites hold the power. Whites who don't hate Whites aren't allowed to advocate for White people. That is not real power. It's not objective and I've explained why. So it doesn't matter if Whites are replaced for ideological reasons. You're just conceded there is anti White bias. The viewers will decide if the link is valid or not. LOL no you are not the administrator regardless of how much you tell yourself that, loser. Yes, I am thank you. But I still can't think of how anyone can confuse America and the world. Unless he is seven years old. No you as a whole. That's not an augment. Most of the country is White. I never said anything. I've just disputed your implication they contributed a lot compared to others. We are being replaced for ideological reasons. If this was happening to any other race there would be much more outrage. Whites have less inner group preference than all other races. White liberals are the only group who on net prefer other racial groups to their own. https://twitter.com/ZachG932/status/1100501799260311553