MovieChat Forums > OvertonPendulum > Replies
OvertonPendulum's Replies
Not if there is war. Indians died mostly due to diseases. Before Europeans came, they killed and took land from eachother.
I have looked for Hispanic on the site and there is no result. It includes Hispanic just like the FBI table. You lose.
Then your book is wrong. There was no international law back then. The conquest ethic was present throughout the world. Whites did not invent the conquest ethic, they were just better at it because of technological superiority.
If it's not true show me the evidence they don't count Hispanics with Whites. FBI counts Hispanics with Whites and this is based off FBI.
Whites conquered land, not steal. You should learn the difference. Land cannot be stolen, only won or lost.
What is wrong? That they count Hispanics with Whites? Show me a Hispanic category then.
I have never broken any rules in debating with you. You just want to cheat by censoring views you don't like because you can't argue against my ideas.
No he wasn't. His speeches were written by Whites. (Including I have a dream speech)
What concession. You still haven't shown evidence I ever listed a White supremacist site. Either provide evidence or admit you lied.
Whites in America behaved better than it is realistically expected of them to behave.
No because they count Hispanics with Whites. They are under their share of the population. You totally shot yourself in the foot with this stat :D
He was a figure head. If he didn't exist they would have found another Black preacher. They needed a figure head.
Again avoiding to show evidence I linked a White supremacist site. Your concession is noted.
What wrongdoing? Freeing Blacks from slavery? Giving Blacks civil rights act? Giving Blacks affirmative action? Not Blaming Blacks for all the Black on White crime?
Those stats don't go against me. They are IN FAVOUR of me. They show Whites under proportionate relative to their share of the population.
Not true, I want races to be judged by the content of their character, which is what woke left doesn't want.
Show me unfairness to Blacks after the 1964 act. OK so you admit there is no unfairness to Blacks today.
Major character is logically implied. Show me major character that got race swapped from Black to White. I can show you many (Spiderman, Annie, James Gordon, Catwoman, Little Mermaid...)
LOL you never criticised Arabs. Be honest. Nor anybody lese beside Whites.
Counting Hispanics with White (and even then they're only just above 50% which is LESS than they're share of the population. Total fail from you.
Tell that to 20.000 White women Blacks rape and sexually assault every year.
My views on race are not immoral. I grant Blacks everything I demand for my people.
So you admit there is no unfairness to Blacks today?
LOL a minor character nobody noticed. Give me a major character.
I don't see you blaming Arabs for their slavery. You only complain about White sins. You're a hypocrite.
It's possible he was killed by people behind him that wanted him to become more powerful. In any case even if it's not true, doesn't prove he changed society. Whites changed society.
You're just running away from having to show evidence. If you really had evidence I sourced White supremacist site, you would be waving it around.
No, I returned back to America by pointing out slave owning facts which you simply ignored.
Problems that racial diversity brings tells anyone with a functioning brain races should live separately. Just look at the racial problems.
That's not what I was saying. I said calling thins racist is not an argument.
Show me how Blacks are not equal. Name me one unfairness to Blacks.
Nope Black to White swap doesn't happen. It could never happen today. All you could come up with is a case of 20 years ago with The Blade and a Hispanic swap with Affleck.
Whites are the only ones blamed for their historic behaviour and nobody else is, Whites are losing their countries, yet they're not victims??
It's not deflection, you were bragging about diversity and how I am bothered by this. I responded I live in Slovenia which is a valid argument.
You ignoring an argument and calling it deflection is not an argument.
I literally won every debate we've had, but you proclaim yourself the winner LOL.
It has never been debunked. Even if was really killed by an angry White guy doesn't prove he himself brought changes and that he wasn't a figurehead. Whites changed society in the 60s not Blacks. Only Whites could have since they had power.
So you can claim I linked a White supremacist site but you don't need to show evidence? LOL
You brought up America and slavery. I just responded with facts.
Your concession to my argument accepted.
They are majority of the population and have higher IQs than most other peoples. OF course they will have power. That doesn't change the fact they aren't allowed to openly advocate their interests while other races can. If minorities were truly oppressed instead of privileged they would want independence, not be following Whites
But they play a role. Whites are demoralized and this causes depression and drug use.
Which is a function of IQ
That is not true. The opposite is true today when woke news outlets give White people's inventions credit to Black people.
I never said Whites are better at acting than Blacks. You have to prove Blacks are better for your NBA analogy to work.
If Black on White race swapping was a ideological it would bother every leftie and every Black. You know it.