Woke garbage

BS. You would care. If a movie about Whites and Native Americans portrayed NAs in a negative light especially if that part was historically inaccurate it would be a HUGE controversy and in fact that kind of movie would never be made. But it's OK to make a historically revisionist movie portraying Whites as bad. Double standards against White people.

Almost all hero franchises were invented by Whites. Whites are under no obligation to have minorities in their films no more than Chinese are under obligation to have Whites in their films. If minorities want to be represented, they should make their own movies which in fact they are. Jordan Peele's movies feature mostly Black casts and Whites aren't stopping him from doing that. But nobody complains about Jordan Peele because all Black casts are OK, but all White casts aren't. More double standards against White people.

LOL but you can't name it.

I listed real movements. Just because you are so ignorant and you haven't heard of them doesn't mean they don't' exist. Look at the culture/political divisions in America. They are mainly because of race. They said Trump would never become president. And even if racial separation never happens doesn't mean it's not the right thing to do.

Blacks go the right to vote after the civil war. Civil rights act was about prohibiting private business owners from keeping Blacks from their property. It's telling if a Slovenian knows more of American history than an American.

Yes you do have to. That's why I asked you. If you can't come up with an example of a Black fictional character that could be replaced by a White, that means there is a double standard since White characters get replaced by POC all the time (Annie, Spiderman, John Connor, James Gordon, Catwoman, Little Mermaid....)

You mean conquering the land the kind of Black West Africans engaged in when they genocided and took the land form the Pygmies and Bushmen. Or when Indians massacred and took land from each others? Oh, but it's a problem only when White people do it (never mind it was not a genocide and Indians died form diseases). Feelings are also hurt when Black characters get replaced by Whites so that means this shouldn't be a problem either.

Some Blacks fought, but their efforts would have been fruitless had powerful Whites in the media and academia not wanted change. This is what I mean when I say rights were given to Blacks by Whites. It is Whites who changed society in the 1960s, not Blacks.

I never posted any White supremacists sites. I posted a totally apolitical IQ site (which is the first result if you Google "Baltimore IQ). You just label it White supremacist because you don't like what IQ tests show.

No people besides Whites in the 19th century ever thought slavery was bad and made any efforts to end it. Whites were the first to end slavery than any other race. Arab countries ended slavery in the 1960s and Mauritania in the 1970s. When Whites were singing to the Beatles with flowers in their hair and talking about free love, Arabs and Africans were debating weather or not they should end slavery. But today only Whites get blamed for it.

MLK was a figure head. If truth about his Communism, sex orgies and plagiarism broke out when he was alive, he would have been done for. It was White elite institutions who changed society, not Blacks and MLK.

IT's not about Catowman. I'm talking about a PATTERN (Annie, Spiderman, John Connor, James Gordon, Catwoman, Little Mermaid...). An individual swap can also be for practical reasons, but the PATTERN is only explain by ideology since Hollywood is admittedly woke and believes in such things as "diversity", inersectionality and "inclusion". How I would do it? I would keep historical White characters White and Black characters Black.

LOL tell that to Israelis (who have a pro Jewish immigration policy), Japanese (who have the same), Liberians (you can't become citizen unless you're Black), Mexicans (have a law aimed at preserving it's ethnic composition). You never hear your liberals complaining about those. It's OK for all these countries to have a racial immigration policy, but not for a White country. Chinese would never allow immigration that could threaten them ever becoming a minority. So wouldn't the Indians. In White Western countries Whites are becoming a minority, Whites allow it and they are called racist. But never those non White countries who have basically no immigration whatsoever. A total double standard.

War on drugs was a consequence of elevated drug use in the 60s and 70s and the negative consequences to society they bring. Elevated drug use was a result of liberal social changes of that era. Had America stayed it was in the 1950s this would never become such a big problem. It was never proven drug war was designed to be aimed at Blacks, it's just that Blacks were more likely to use and deal drugs.

Nope you said "MOST MONEY", not "MORE MONEY". Your lying is noted. Also you never answered me how can America be White supremacist if POCs (Indians) make most money.

You never answered it. You might not care, but others do. It would be an outrage.