MovieChat Forums > HorrorMetal > Replies
HorrorMetal's Replies
Apparently, his name is Munro Gabler.
[url]https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/54992/who-played-the-locksmith-in-the-first-men-in-black-film[/url]
The full joke goes something like this:
One day, a man is strolling through an open-air market place. He stops at one of the live animal stalls and buys a chicken thinking that he will take it home, wring its neck, clean it and make a nice chicken stew for dinner. On his way home he passes a theater that is showing a movie that he has been wanting to see and he decides to go in. But when the woman at the box office sees the chicken she tells him, "Sir, animals are not allowed in the theater. You'll have to come back some other time." Well, now, this guy really wants to see the movie (it's probably something starring Tommy Lee Jones) so he goes around the corner, stuffs the chicken down his pants then returns to the theater and buys his ticket. After he has taken a seat and the movie starts, the chicken starts to get restless, so the man unzips his pants to let the chicken get some air. The woman sitting next to him leans over to her husband and whispers, "Honey, the man next to me has his pants open!" Her husband tells her, "Just ignore him!" "But Honey! His thing is sticking out!" Again her husband says, "Ignore it! You've seen one before!" "But Honey!," she finally says, "This one's eating my popcorn!"
What I want to know is how the hell that enormous cockroach creature could fit inside human skin. That thing was at least fifteen feet long with that huge tail and so many legs, doesn't seem too plausible that it could squeeze into Edgar's form like that.
Yeah you're probably right. Good catch.
Most definitely. I think it's mostly due to the fact that he gradually looked more and more human as the movie progressed, which is something the sequels didn't follow up upon.
Gabby Gabby was the villain... I think.
I had all the same issues with the movie that you did. I still liked it, but it’s probably my least favorite of the series.
Well, slightly. Skyfall seemed to have a few more of the Bond tropes the series was known for, such as the proper gunbarrel sequence (even though it was at the end), theme song sharing the same title as the movie, and one liners. It also had Q, Moneypenny, a colorful villain with an elaborate backstory/motivation, etc. All of those things were missing from Casino Royale, despite that being the superior film overall.
Casino Royale by a hair, but I think Skyfall feels more like a traditional Bond film.
Haha, good one.
Agreed. I've always loved that song and it's one of my top favorite Bond main themes, right up there with Goldfinger, Live and Let Die, and View to a Kill.
I don't get it either. I always thought this was a fun movie and an adequate follow up to Goldeneye, though I don't find it quite as good as that one. I thought Jonathan Pryce made an interesting and believable villain, whose motivations and master plan made perfect sense for the time the movie came out. There were a lot of villainous media mogul type tycoons in the 90's and still are.
1. Sean Connery
2. Roger Moore
3. Pierce Brosnan
4. Daniel Craig
5. Timothy Dalton
6. George Lazenby
Yeah, good point.
Donald Pleasence, closely followed by Telly Savalas.
When I first watched this, the fact that the T-1000 killed that cop at the beginning made it blatantly clear that he was the villain.
It was a pretty stupid plot for sure, and the villains themselves were rather lame. They really dragged down what is otherwise a pretty good Bond movie. It's for that reason I always found the following film far superior. License to Kill actually had a great villain with a more believable and straightforward scheme.
1. Goldfinger
2. From Russia With Love
3. Dr. No
4. You Only Live Twice
5. The Spy Who Loved Me
I thought the first half was great. Seeing the time machine for first time in the series was neat and they recreated the scenes from the original very well. That couldn't have been easy. Was also cool seeing a T-1000 again. But once they time jump to 2017, the film really goes downhill. Aside from some decent action here and there, the scenes after they skip ahead are mostly boring and forgettable. And I hate how they made John Connor a villain, especially since Jason Clarke had potential to be the best adult version of the character. So basically I love the first half of the movie, but the second half was mostly mediocre in my opinion.
Exactly. Just more of the same.