MovieChat Forums > wags9452
wags9452 (25)
Posts
Finally just watched. There's only 1 plot hole
IT Part 1 and 2 supercut
for fans of the book
any hardcore fans out there?
View all posts >
Replies
The suits and masks seemed to be S.O.P. for anyone who was inverted or could possiblly come in contact with their doppelganger. Presumably most members of the red team were part of the original siege.
I think this whole segment would have been more successful from a film making standpoint without the armies. Keep the infiltration team small and stick with stealth. In theory, the only reason there is a large resistance amry is Sator is reacting to the blue teams attept to stop the events of the past.
"I would have appreciated an extra few minutes from the film to answer "why" to several unexplained 'reasons/motives' about people, places, and unrevealed 'origins/events' of the plot prior to the original loop paradox."
This is also something I would have liked. The first act seemed to move from set piece to set piece way too quickly. I would not want any more runtime but I feel like there was opportunity for better exposition dumps in the first and third acts.
I went and saw a screening of Inception last weekend and was amazed again at the amount of exposition that's pretty seamlessly integrated into that movie.
Also, I actually didn't notice the audio problems so many are complaining about. I'll consider myself fortunate.
I'm in Kansas City, MO. The local theater I go to has been open all summer with limited seating. On the whole we've been very lucky with covid here.
No I did not. It was exactly what I expected it to be. A showy action movie that perfectly exemplifies Nolans style. I dont think people with this criticism understand what it means.
If this is you, go watch Tree of Life. Its also a visually stunning movie from a well respected auteur.
I enjoyed it considerably more than Interstellar. Probably my least favorite as well, though close with Dark Knight Rises. After first viewing I think I'd rank Trnet 5th among his features.
I just got back from seeing it 2 hrs ago and I really don't think it was that confusing. The first act is intentionally obtuse and I found it rewarding once events started going backwards. It's very plot heavy and there's definitely no hand holding but that's what makes Chis Nolan great. I'll be seeing it again for sure though
What part of the sequence of events at the end of the movie leads you to believe that that much time was able to pass before Loki arrived. She clearly drives the truck into the back yard hastily.
She does not back down the driveway and drive off with his tools and gun to ditch everything and then what, walk back to the house to kill the girl. There is still heavy traffic as Loki drives to the Hospital indicating it not likely to be latter than 9pm.
Yes, its worth seeing for Joaquin's performance alone. Even more so if you're remotely interested in the character of the Joker. Personally I'm generally not a fan of comic book movies either.
And yes, it's a bit derivative but at least its inspirations are from great films and not the dreck that Hollywood churns out every other week. IMO its worth your time. You could certainly do a lot worse.
Statistically the white audience is still the majority in 2019 in the US. And you seem to have missed my point.
God I hope you're trolling. Movies aren't made for a specific (fill in the blank) audience. They're made for anyone that takes the time to watch them.
It's a wonder the Godfather ever won anything considering it was <i>"made just for a white, Italian, audience."</i> Not to mention Boyz N the Hood getting two nods since it was <i>"made just for a black audience."</i> And the coup de gras, Avatar, a movie <i>"made just for a blue audience."</i>
View all replies >