MovieChat Forums > Keelai > Replies
Keelai's Replies
Of course, it is. Women earn less than men for the same job, sexual harassment, discrimination for higher-paying jobs and traditional male jobs.
[url]http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/14/gender-discrimination-comes-in-many-forms-for-todays-working-women/[/url]
[url]https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/american_experiences/women.cfm[/url]
My typo. I should have wrote "access to economic resources". In plain English it means women not being allowed to work or job discrimination, etc.
I saw your article before I linked my information. According to your article's definition of rape, Bill Cosby didn't rape anyone.
NCVS defines rape: "Rape is forced sexual intercourse and includes both psychological coercion as well as physical force.
That definition is antiquated and was last updated in 1992:
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/FEMVIED.PDF
The present definition of rape is: nonconsensual sex. That would include being drugged or drunk, sex with a minor, someone who is passed out. Basically someone who hasn't consented because of their age or their mental state as well as physical force and coercion.
My guess is that the government is trying to keep the stats artificially low by using a rape definition that is narrow and very old.
Your article was also written in 2014 and refers to a 2011 survey. My link is a 2015 survey which addresses some of the issues stated in the article. I linked it in order that people could examine the methodology that was used.
Fox "news":
"...They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."
Factual Reporting: MIXED
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to word and story selection that favors the right and Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and spreading conspiracy theories that later must be retracted.
[url]https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/[/url]
A suggestion. You should find an accurate news source.
It had to be in the script since it was in the dialogue. Lucas still hired (fired one because he wouldn't listen to Lucas) and directed the three editors.
It's a collaborative effort (editors won an Oscar) but Lucas was still the main creative force.
That's not true. Luke was trained by Yoda long enough to become buff and there was still a little training with Ben.
Rey needed no training because she mind-melded with Kylo (which is stupid and has nothing to do with SW) and Luke didn't really teach her anything.
My problem with Disney SW is they want everything to be completed without any work: a romance between Rose and Finn with no attraction/courtship; Rey is a Jedi with no training; major Luke personality change with no backstory; New Order controls galaxy with no battle nor war, etc.
In the book, Heir to the Empire, Luke's in contact with Ben's ghost for years, but still feels unsure as he trains Leia. She has to make a strong effort to be good.
I actually know people who liked this film.
The only remaining parts left are Jake Skywalker molesting a sea cow and Mary Rey teaching herself to become an expert swordsperson by waving a lightsaber around for 15 minutes.
Maybe the way to re-edit would be add more comedy, a laugh track and commentary from the Mystery Science Theater 3000s cast.
I don't think you're aware that you pretty much criticized the entire movie and didn't name one good thing about it. "Other than that" is vague and "it was okay" sounds like settling for mediocrity.
I expect much more from a Star Wars movie.
You're welcome. Cancelled show "Lucifer" was just picked up by Netflix. I wish they'd do the same for "The Crossing".
The script for a New Hope was pretty good before filming.
I cant imagine what is good about Last Jedi that is worth editing. It's literally the worst film I have ever seen in my life.The script is abysmal.
There's an ending and worth watching. Rest of my message below.
They pretty much wrapped it up. No cliff hanger.
The producer tweeted:
"season 1 was written to be a complete story in and of itself... we're not saying you won't be wanting more when it ends, but we are saying you’ll be happy you watched the remaining eps... to see your theories tested..."
I agree. Last episode was really good, too.
A re-edit of this garbage won't help it. They need to scrap it and beg Hamill to return. My guess is that they'll be a complete reboot of the sequel trilogy if Episode 9 and all future SW movies bomb along with dismal merchandise sales.
I began to binge after I found out it was cancelled. So far I like it and have one episode to go.
It's confirmed. ABC has a habit of cancelling good sci-fi.
Putin is drafting the bill for his Manchurian puppet president.
Dailywire STILL has no credibility. They'd rather omit important information in order to sensationalize rather than report accurately.
The full story is about tracking the homeless. A woman won a competition that used complaints about human feces and urine phoned in to the city’s Department of Public Works to locate where the homeless were in order to provide services.
"“There’s not much choice other than the street when a homeless person needs a bathroom,” said Wong. “It’s pretty clear where the need is.”
As human waste complaints rose, the Department of Public Works launched a pilot program in the summer to deliver and collect portable toilets for the homeless every day. Complaints in the area have dropped, and the city is considering expanding the operation to other areas.
The maps prompted some tongue-in-cheek humor about human excrement. But they also started a conversation about the need for affordable housing in the increasingly expensive Bay Area, as well as for toilets, laundry facilities and showers for the homeless. She donated some of her winnings to a project that provides mobile toilets and showers to the homeless."
The COMPLETE story:
[url]https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-homeless-san-francisco-excrement/human-feces-map-finds-san-franciscos-homeless-idUSKBN0K90SO20141231[/url]
Dailywire has no credibility.
Then why was Trump recently pranked by Stuttering John Melendez formerly of the Howard Stern show?
Baba-Booey! Baba-Booey!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qhDrk3Sf2A
His buildings in NYC are among the worst polluters in the city. Why am I not surprised?
[url]http://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner-trump-buildings-polluters-new-york-1000010[/url]